Jump to content
wonderer

Thoughts (2010-2016) [ARCHIVE]

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, IbnSina said:

You did not put laana after the name of muawiya(la), why?

Your problem is that you do not recognize who is here to debate and who is here to preach.

Not all people who wishes peace upon muawiya(la) are nasibis, but if you have been informed about the history and his character but still insist that he is pious then not only are you a fool but you are also one who holds hatred since you would see someone hateful like muawiya(la) as a pious person.

Understand that not everyone who opens a discussion are out to discuss, understand that not everyone who hears you will want to listen.

I don't and won't because the majority of sunni's revere him. I'll show you his crimes, but i am not going to give fodder for others to attack shia islam by. Instead of focusing on his crimes, they will emotionally rouse others and focus on me sending lanah. That would be tactically foolish. I will follow the guidance of the Imams a.s, and place the safety of their madhab first and foremost.

Yazid however, is fair game.

The issue is, even if someone has informed a sunni brother about the truth. They may not have been informed when their mind was ready to accept. It may not have been explained properly. There may be other factors obstructing them to accept reality. In any case, they are mistaken and ignorant to the truth, and if it is a conclusion more sinister, let Allah be the judge - at least when we are all online.

Abu Rumaysh loves the Ahlulbayt, and also their enemies. He does not love their enemies because he believes their enemies were the enemies we deem them to be. But because his history is not the same as ours, and even if we have the same histories in cases, his interpretation is not the same as ours.

Let's engage in an academic dialogue , and agree to disagree?

Edited by uponthesunnah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, uponthesunnah said:

I don't and won't because the majority of sunni's revere him. I'll show you his crimes, but i am not going to give fodder for others to attack shia islam by. Instead of focusing on his crimes, they will emotionally rouse others and focus on me sending lanah. That would be tactically foolish. I will follow the guidance of the Imams a.s, and place the safety of their madhab first and foremost.

I think that not only do you not send him laana in public but I think that you do not do it in private either.

I am not afraid to speak truth, I will speak it and I will be very frank and direct. If they hate me for it, they have hated me for speaking truth. If they kill me for it, they have killed me for speaking truth.

 

13 minutes ago, uponthesunnah said:

Yazid however, is fair game.

By your logic, yazid(la) should not be sent laana either because many sunnis in their ignorance send him blessings. Now your telling me two things or you have not thought this thru. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, IbnSina said:

I think that not only do you not send him laana in public but I think that you do not do it in private either.

I am not afraid to speak truth, I will speak it and I will be very frank and direct. If they hate me for it, they have hated me for speaking truth. If they kill me for it, they have killed me for speaking truth.

By your logic, yazid(la) should not be sent laana either because many sunnis in their ignorance send him blessings. Now your telling me two things or you have not thought this thru. 

It is better not to make assumptions brother. If you got my hint, and have read what i have written on Muawiyah, you would know one would not have to be explicit.

Either way, my issue was not in performing Lanah on muawiyah. I have no right to stop anyone from doing it on here. I just think it's unhelpful to debate someone about a revered symbol of theirs, and then curse the symbol at the same time. Yazid is different because there is far less ikhtilaaf on him. Muawiyah is a little trickier.

It was on calling sunni's who are not converted based on a debate on shiachat as nasibi's. 

We can't expect people to convert over a debate on SC brother, and label them when they don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, IbnSina said:

I think that not only do you not send him laana in public but I think that you do not do it in private either.

I am not afraid to speak truth, I will speak it and I will be very frank and direct. If they hate me for it, they have hated me for speaking truth. If they kill me for it, they have killed me for speaking truth.

 

By your logic, yazid(la) should not be sent laana either because many sunnis in their ignorance send him blessings. Now your telling me two things or you have not thought this thru. 

Brother, i don't want us to have grudges between us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, uponthesunnah said:

We can't expect people to convert over a debate on SC brother

Then what exactly is holding you back from sending laana again?? 

 

And no, I am not holding a grudge against you but I have been observing you for some time and you are walking on the sharp side of a blade, tilt a little bit to each side and you will lose your balance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, IbnSina said:

Then what exactly is holding you back from sending laana again?? 

 

And no, I am not holding a grudge against you but I have been observing you for some time and you are walking on the sharp side of a blade, tilt a little bit to each side and you will lose your balance.

I would rather the debate centred on Muawiyahs crimes, than get derailed and turn violent because i performed lanah on the person i was debating's revered figure.  You can openly perform Lanah, i won't stop you, but i know full well the consequences on our madhab by doing so.

My issue was not you sending lanah upon muawiyah - but it was on calling a sunni user a nasibi because he failed to convert on his position over a shia-chat debate. 

Edited by uponthesunnah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, E.L King said:

I heard they taste like shrimp. Is that true?

And what parts are suitable to be eaten? The entire body?

You eat the whole thing. These things are farm raised.

They do not taste like shrimp. The ones l had you could only taste the sweetened soy sauce and herbs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • Guest Boy
      I m 28yrs old .I started praying since last year. I was not knowing the importance of praying.My parents never told me to pray .They were only after my studies.I was busy in my life not knowing the real purpose if life  . I new nothing about what are the duties of muslim. Then Allah guided me at the age of 27 and i started going to masjid . Now i regret why was i so far away from my deen for so many years.Some questions kill me everyday ..Why didnt allahs guidance came early .? .I have to make up for so many prayers.i have asked Allah for forgiveness .Why i hav to still make up?. Is it too late age to get guided ?  Like i have done nothing no namaz no roza ..when my parents never told me about deen how am i responsible ? Now i ask Allah for forgiveness why i still have to make up for qada ?? If i make niyat of making qada after some years is it ok  or i hav to start praying qada ??When were u ppl guided to do these things ? I am feeling very bad..Whatever we learn from childhood imprints in heart ..i have learnt nothing..share ur views please
    • This is not possible because this is a breach of the basis of unity. When its decided that we are not going to discuss about our beliefs. Scholars can sit together and discuss all this but this can't be done in a public scenario.
    • Quran has not talked about the punishment of Apostaty in this world. But we have Sahih hadeeths from Imams. Quran doesn't tell everything explicitly.  When Imam Ali said that "all secrets and knowledge is condensed in Quran" then it means we can't access it but they can. So its better to be satisfied with the hadeetha and Marajes have done a lot of study to accept these hadeeth and Law. And you're not being killed for your belief but your action. Flee to any other Non Muslim country and you're free but if you harm Muslim society by your Apostasy then you are ought to be killed as you are a corrupter.
    • What this means is that we are no longer UNDER the Law, Meaning we don't have to accomplish the hundreds of Laws the Jews had to follow to be HOLY in the sight of God. The same laws which the Jewish people were unable to accomplish except for Jesus which never sinned. That is why God sent his Son to put the Law in our hearts through his new covenant. This does not give us a free passage to sin, It means that God dwells with us and punishes us as children when we disobey and sin.... It is even prophesied in the Hebrew books that God was going to give us this new Covenant. This is what Jesus was meaning when he said this is the NEW TESTAMENT(Covenant). Jeremiah 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: 32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they brake, although I was an husband unto them, saith the LORD: 33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. 34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.
×