Jump to content


- - - -


Photo
- - - - -

Zakir Naik


40 replies to this topic

#1 syed_shia

syed_shia

    Muslim

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,399 posts

Posted 29 October 2009 - 10:03 AM

salaam

I think we all heard of Zakir Naik and of his view on Yazeed which he made public on tv where he said (may Allah be please with him).

Now ive just listened to another of his lectures where he defends yazeed (la) but yet 'curses those who killed him'. Which obviously he accuses the shias of this.

Its just shockig to know how he can defend yazeed by saying its not good to curse, but yet curses the shias.

HE curses those who killed husayn (as) but he doesnt curse the one responsbible for this, as he says was the caliph of the time?

shocking to hear this.

i know its not the opinion of the whole ahle sunnah.

HE good in non muslim debates. but if he gets it wrong sooooo badly with islam itself, he is completely lost, and makes you question his whole lectures.

here it is


Ali

#2 syed_shia

syed_shia

    Muslim

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,399 posts

Posted 29 October 2009 - 10:11 AM

such as shame... a knowledge person with alot of hatred in himself.

Also shame he doesnt actually 'know' the shia belief.

Makes you think again and question the validity of him question the hindus and christians, are they from fair sources.

Dot like him anymore

ALi

#3 shoelace

shoelace

    Trust in words of GOD,Legend In Making.

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 866 posts
  • Location:my Queen's heart
  • Religion:Quranist and lover of Ahlulbayt
  • Interests:my horse,turban and my sword.

Posted 29 October 2009 - 10:15 AM

may be he is good in knowledge of tawhid when it comes to ahlul bayt and history of islaam he comes out as a noob...i dont like him either he is just a parrot who keeps on repeating same stuff which he has by hearted without understanding.

#4 Basim Ali

Basim Ali

    Unity - in all walks of life

  • Mods
  • 4,679 posts
  • Interests:Servitude of my Lord and the closest ones to Him

Posted 29 October 2009 - 11:43 AM

(salam),
I heard a lecture of his, on youtube, where he said, all mausoleums, should be demolished. (he delivered the speech in Urdu, so it's an Urdu idiom, 'mitti main mila daina' meaning ground to earth')
He was clearly criticizing Shia Muslims, for building mausoleums over Imams' graves. I also heard he said, he will not interfere in and talk about, sectarian differences, but he's doing a bad job keeping up with what he said.
Besides, Shias are not the only one to be blamed for this 'crime'.
Mausoleum of Imam Bukhari:
Posted Image

(wasalam)
Basim Ali Jafri

#5 imanbeautysoap

imanbeautysoap

    Member

  • Unregistered
  • PipPip
  • 268 posts

Posted 29 October 2009 - 12:15 PM

(bismillah) (salam)
1 of 3 choices does not mean hussein SA liked the choices,and crying???
what can that prove.

For them (sunnis) it still is not enough to say shia do this so they are bad. For them it should not matter if they dont know.

and if bush kills children is the mother wrong for calling bush a murderer? I suppose along the same rationnalle bush is innocent because he did not kill anyone we know of.
And lastly if shia are so rotten what does that make the other side he was fighting? Answer pure as snow! :wacko:
now i wonder which side he would be on?

Edited by imanbeautysoap, 29 October 2009 - 12:26 PM.


#6 syed_shia

syed_shia

    Muslim

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,399 posts

Posted 29 October 2009 - 04:41 PM

the thing is....

Adolf Hitler never killed a person with his own 2 hands.

As im aware so didnt saddam husayn (correct me if im wrong).

But if they were in charge, they ordered it to happen, they put people in charge to make sure it happens...

Its pathetic from zakir naik to justify yazeed (la), and to make him innocent of this, but is quick to curse 'those who did' and then hinting that it was the shias.

ridiculous.

So its fine for him to 'curse' but not when its the actually tyrant, yazeed.

#7 Darth Vader

Darth Vader

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,277 posts
  • Interests:Tutbir and Nihari

Posted 29 October 2009 - 06:44 PM

Zakir Naik is not sunni, he is a Kharijite. His knowledge and antics are garbage. All he does is tell pagans that statues of clay can't help them. You think that takes "knowledge"? May Allah guide him, and if not, then may he end up in fire right beside his Imam Yazid la'een ibn la'een. I can't help but say, bay-shumaar on Zakir Naik, unless he can change his stars and repents.

#8 imanbeautysoap

imanbeautysoap

    Member

  • Unregistered
  • PipPip
  • 268 posts

Posted 29 October 2009 - 07:10 PM

the thing is....

Adolf Hitler never killed a person with his own 2 hands.

As im aware so didnt saddam husayn (correct me if im wrong).

But if they were in charge, they ordered it to happen, they put people in charge to make sure it happens...

Its pathetic from zakir naik to justify yazeed (la), and to make him innocent of this, but is quick to curse 'those who did' and then hinting that it was the shias.

ridiculous.

So its fine for him to 'curse' but not when its the actually tyrant, yazeed.

(bismillah) (salam)

It is like an old woman who tries to act coy and giggles too much. trying to recapture when she was innocent/ignorant but it just does not fit.

He may have rocked the crowds when he honestly was ignorant but now when he examines and persists he seems demented.

That video sums up everything that is wrong with breaking off into sects and not getting together to examine and help each other.

You may not overcome the speaker but the audience can be given the opportunity to discuss, and learn. Lies only gain that momentum after a long time.

It has been long enough, its a retarded situation that nobody is working for demolishing these lies.

the people who 'know' and dont do anything may as well fart in the bath giggle and pick dandelions :o
yeah i said it. time for change.

Edited by imanbeautysoap, 29 October 2009 - 07:13 PM.


#9 Gypsy

Gypsy

    Hal Min Nasirin Yansurna

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,509 posts
  • Interests:Exposing hypocrisy and double standards.

Posted 02 November 2009 - 07:00 PM

(salam)
You can search youtube for Sayyed Ammar nakshawani response to Zakir Naik. He has given an excellent speech on this matter.

#10 zanyrulez

zanyrulez

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 891 posts

Posted 03 November 2009 - 03:35 AM

Zakir Naik is a pathetic fool. He is back with his "International peace conference" this year. This means that his ugly face is pasted over all the billboards and buses in Mumbai. You just can't ignore it.
It is rumored that he spends crores of rupees on the conference. Most probably he is getting the money from Saudi.
  • Whizbee likes this

#11 Your-Best-Friend

Your-Best-Friend

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,763 posts
  • Location:NO-WHERE-LAND
  • Interests:Religious Books and Visiting Families & Friends

Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:23 AM

hey all, his current name is not ZAKIR NAIK, but NA-LAIK MALOON, so be careful next time when writing or pronouncing his name.....hahahehe

#12 SHAUZEB

SHAUZEB

    ãäÊÙÑ ÇãÇã ÚÕÑ ÚÌ

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPip
  • 483 posts
  • Location:B.C
  • Religion:Athnaashri
  • Interests:Creator, His Messengers, His Ahle Bait(as), All Saying Labbaik to Holy message.

Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:28 AM

hey all, his current name is not ZAKIR NAIK, but NA-LAIK MALOON, so be careful next time when writing or pronouncing his name.....hahahehe



:!!!: , well said

#13 Your-Best-Friend

Your-Best-Friend

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,763 posts
  • Location:NO-WHERE-LAND
  • Interests:Religious Books and Visiting Families & Friends

Posted 03 November 2009 - 04:42 AM


MAULANA ZAKI BAQRI answered NA-LAIK MALOON


Ref: Nazr-e-Qaim Trust : http://nqtrust.multi...journal/item/17



Salaamun Alaikum,



First thing I would like ask is that, is he ready to do munazarah with me in this subject as he loves to do it with Hindus and Christians?



It seems he doesn't believe in the books of Sihahe Sittah which are the most authentic books in accordance with the Sunni believe.



Follwoing are some examples:



As per Holy Qur'an Chapter 2:44.'ATA'MUROONAN-NASA BIL-BIIRI WA TANSAUNA ANFUSAKUM WA ANTUM TATLOONAL-KITABA AFALA TA'QILOON '.

' What ! do you enjoin men to be good and neglect your awn souls while you read the Book; have you then no sense? '



Is naik having no sense that he adds word ' May Allah (S.W.T.) be pleased with him ' for that yazid who was making mockery of HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.) and revealation.Naik should refer to the books of scholars from all muslim sects who have many differences in other things but in the matter of yazid they stand united.There are unanimously accepted famous couplets of yazid.The cursed yazid was reciting these couplets while he was drunk.Just one of it is sufficient to know that Yazid was rejecting the revealation.' MA KHABARUN JAA'A WALA WAHYUN NAZAL ' i.e no news came and and nothing was revealed.



Is naik having no sense in claiming that karbala was a political war.Is naik not inviting the wrath of Allah (S.W.T.) by rejecting the saying of IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.).

IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) himself said that ' INNAMA KHARAJTU LITALABIL-ISLAHI FI UMMATI JADDI ' (Indeed I have taken a step

(I came out) for the Islah of my grandfather's (i.e HOLY PROPHET'S) Ummah).How can naik's version of Islam be accepted while he rejects the authentic saying of Truthful Imam and grandson of HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.)



Is naik having no sense that IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) was from amongst AHLULBAIT (A.S) who are purified by Allah (S.W.T.) and this is announced in 33:33.Sahih bukhari, sahih muslim and other source of traditions explain the great merits of AHLULBAIT (A.S.).Hence the enemy and killer of IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) will be none but impure and unjust as per QUR'AN.Then where does naik stand?



Is naik having no sense that he is adding the words ' may Allah(S.W.T.) be pleased with him ' after the name of cursed yazeed who killed the leader of youths of paradise as per unanimously accepted hadith of HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.) '' AL-HASANU WAL-HUSAINU SAYYIDA SHABABI AHLIL-JANNAH .' (The HASAN and the HUSAIN are the leader of youths of paradise).Does naik think that yazid was not unjust in killing AHLULBAIT (A.S.) and leader of youths of paradise.

Which verse of holy Qur'an justifies the oppressions done on the family of HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.) in karbala.On what basis can he call the ' supreme sacrifice ' to be a political war? naik quotes refrences to prove his point from other books in interfaith dialogue, hence naik is either hiding the truth about karbala if he has read or one can conclude that when it comes to discussion about Islam, AHLULBAIT (A.S.) and KARBALA, he is totally ignorant and he needs to come out of darkness about supreme sacrifice of karbala.



Is naik having no sense in praising the killer of IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.), who in a way killed HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.).

This is because both in sahihain and hundred of other books it is quoted from HOLY PRPHET (S.A.W.W.):' HUSAINU MINNI WA ANA MIN HUSAIN which means HHUSAIN is from ME and I am from HUSAIN'. This is not an ordinary saying explaining an ordinary relation of a grandfather and a grandson, because its the saying of that PROPHET (S.A.W.W.) for whom Allah (S.W.T.) has announced in Holy Qur'an ,Chapter 53:3 'WAMA YANTIQU ANIL-HAWA IN HUWA ILLA WAHYUN YUHA ' i.e He (HOLY PROPHET) doesn't speak out of desire, it is not but revealation that is revealed .' Hence Allah's PROPHET has announced that HE (S.A.W.W.) and IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) are related to each other through the supreme sacrifice which would the message of Islam.

So rejecting IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) is rejecting PROPHET MUHAMMED (S.A.W.W.) and killing IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) is killing the HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.).Hence as per this true hadith, yazid actually killed HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.).



Is naik having no snse that he supports a killer while Allah (S.W.T.) says in HOLY QURAN Chapter 5:32 ' MAN QATALA NAFSAN BIGHAIRI NAFSIN AW FASADIN FIL-ARZ FAKAANNAMA QATALAN-NASA JAMEEAA ' which means ' And whoever slays a soul, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in the land, it is as though he slew all men. Now that muslims unanimously accept IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) to be RIGHTEOUS GRANDSON OF HOLY PROPHET, IMAM, TRUTHFUL, FROM AMONG AHLULBAIT, LEADER OF YOUTHS OF PARADISE', then all muslims have to accept that each and every move of IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) is authenticated by HOLY QURAN and TRUE AHADITH.Hence there is no choice left but to condemn yazid the killer of IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.).The crime of yazid as per the verse mentioned is very big in all sense , because if killing of one innocent man is like killing all men, then killing of leader of paradise is like killing all the people of paradaise.



TRUTH is that for naik there is not even one verse in QURAN nor one authentic hadith mentioning his name to guarantee paradise for him and his followers, but IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) is not only mentioned by name and is guaranteed paradise by TRUTHFUL PROPHET (S.A.W.W), but he will also be the leader of the youths of paradise.



TRUTH is that naik is not from among pure AHLULBAIT (A.S), hence naik can turn out to be impure and can always go wrong but IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) is pure and he didn't go wrong for a moment.



TRUTH is that naik is not absolutely righteous but IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) is absolutely righteous.Because naik is not the righteous grandson of HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.) nor the PROPHET said that He is from him, hence naik can always go astray but not IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.).



TRUTH is that naik is not directly taught and guided by HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.) hence he himself can be be misled and he can mislead others due to lack of knowledge, prejudice, evil self (nafsil-ammarah), evil deeds and whispering of satan.But IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) was directly taught and guided by HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.) , He is the guided one and guiding others towards paradise.



TRUTH is that naik has become devils advocate by saying 'may Allah (S.W.T.) be pleased with him ' for yazid.IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) the rightly guided IMAM didn't do bay'at of cursed yazid and sacrificed his, family member's and companions life but naik is trying to because yazid was



* Usurper as he was not an appointed caliph of Allah (S.W.T.)

* Drunkard ' SHARIBUL-KHUMUR '

* Murtad due to rejection of QURAN and revealation.

* Opreesor who oppressed HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.)'s family members, women, children and some companions of HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.).

* Killer of the great and pious companions of HOLY PROPHET (S.A.W.W.), righteous BANU HASHIM and IMAM HUSAIN (A.S.) the leader of youths of paradise.



H?usayn ibn ‘Ali ibn Abi T?alib (ÍÓíä Èä Úáí Èä Ã?? ØÇáÈ) (third of Shaban 626, at Medina - tenth of Muharram 680, at Karbala) was the grandson of the Islamic prophet Muhammad and the son of Ali, the first Shia Imam, and the fourth Sunni Rightly Guided Caliph, and Muhammad's daughter Fatima Zahra. Husayn ibn Ali is revered as the third Imam (Supreme Authority) by most Shi’a Muslims, and as the second Imam by the majority of Ismaili Shi'a Muslims.[1]



He was killed in the Battle of Karbala in 680.[2] The anniversary of his death is called Ashura and it is a day of mourning and religious observance for Shi'a Muslims. This day is well-known because of mourning for the martyrdom of Husayn ibn Ali the grandson of Muhammad, along with his family and close friends at the Battle of Karbala in the year 61 AH (680). Yazid I Ibn Muwa'via Ibn Abu Sufyan was in power then and wanted the Bay'ah (allegiance) of Husayn ibn Ali. Yazid was openly going against the teachings of Islam in public and changing the sunnah of Muhammad.[citation needed] Historians agree that if Husayn ibn Ali had not taken the stance that he did, the religion of Islam would not be what it is today.[citation needed]



After Hasan ibn Ali was born; Fatima al-Zahra bint Muhammad became pregnant with her second child. Fatima started noticing the signs that childbearing was near, but Muhammad had already foretold of Husayn ibn Ali’s birth.



On Sha'ban 3, 4 H.E., Muhammad was given news of the birth of Husayn ibn Ali. Muhammad hurried to the house of Fatimah al-Zahra his daughter and Ali ibn Abi Talib. Saffiyah bint ‘Abd al-Muttalib, Asma bint Umais, and Umm Salama were present when Husayn ibn Ali was born.



When Muhammad asked Safiyah bint 'Abd al-Muttalib to bring him the newborn child, she said:

"We have not cleaned him yet." When Muhammad heard this, he said: "You clean him? Surely Allah the Exalted has cleaned and purified him."



Asma bint Umais took the newborn child to him wrapped in a piece of cloth. Muhammad took him in his arms and recited the call to prayer (Adhan) into his right ear, and read the shorter version (Iqama) in his left ear. He then placed the infant in his lap and wept.



"May my father and mother be your sacrifice", Asma bint Umais asked Muhammad, "Why are you crying?"



"Because of my son", he replied.



"He is a newborn infant", she said.



"O Asma", he said, "After me, the transgressing party will kill him. May Allah never grant them my intercession."



Then he said: "Asma, do not tell Fatima about this, for she has just given birth to him."[3]



After Husayn ibn Ali was born, Archangel Gabriel descended to Muhammad and revealed to him to give the newborn child the name Al-Husayn. Al-Husayn is the Arabic version of the old Hebrew name Shabir, which was the name of Harun’s second son. When Gabriel descended to Muhammad, scores of angels accompanied him to congratulate and console Muhammad for Husayn ibn Ali's birth and expected death.



Seven days after the birth Muhammad shaved Husayn ibn Ali’s head and gave the gold equivalent of the weight of his hair as charity for him.

1. ^ "al-Husayn ibn 'Ali". Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Retrieved on 2007-10-12.



2. ^ Gordon, 2005, pp. 144-146



3. ^ Muhammad Ibn Ismail Bukhari and Muhammad Muhsin Khan (1996). The English Translation of Sahih Al Bukhari With the Arabic Text. Al-Saadawi Publications. ISBN 1881963594



Sayings of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) about Husayn ibn Ali in Sunni books



"Al-Hasan and al-Husayn are the chiefs of the youth of Paradise and Fatimah is the chief of their women."



1. Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, p660, on the authority of Abu Sa'id and Hudhayfa

2. Sunan Ibn Majah, Introduction 8

3. al-Tabarani, on the authorities of: Umar, Ali, Jabir, Abu Hurayrah, Usamah Ibn Zaid, al-Baraa, Ibn 'Adi, and Ibn Masud.

4. al-Kubra, by al-Nasa'i

5. Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v1, pp 62,82, v3, pp 3,64, v5, p391

6. Fada'il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Hanbal, v2, p771, Tradition #1360

7. al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v3, pp 166,167

8. Hilyatul Awliyaa, by Abu Nu'aym, v5, p71

9. Majma' al-Zawa'id, by al-Haythami, v9, p187

10. Tuhfatul Ashraf, by Lumzi, v3, p31

11. Ibn Habban, as mentioned in al-Mawarid, pp 551,553

12. al-Sawa'iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar Haythami, Ch. 11, section 3, p290

13. Mishkat al-Masabih, by Khatib al-Tabrizi, English Version, Tradition #6154



Prophet Muhammad PBUH said, "The member of my home (family members specified in other narrations as Fatima, Ali, Hasan, and Husayn) is from me and I am from Them."



1. Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v4, p172

2. Fadha'il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Hanbal, v2, p772, Tradition #1361

3. al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v3, p 177

4. Amali, by Abu Nu'aym al-Isbahani, p 64

5. al-Kuna wal Asmaa, by al-Dulabi, v1, p88

6. al-Tabarani, v3, p21

7. Adab by al-Bukhari, also al-Tirmidhi and Ibn Majah, as quoted in:

8. al-Sawa'iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar Haythami, Ch. 11, section 3, p291

9. Mishkat al-Masabih, by Khatib al-Tabrizi, English Version, Tradition #6160



Prophet Muhammad PBUH looked toward Ali, Fatimah, Hasan, and Husayn, and then said, "I am in war with those who will fight you, and in peace with those who are peaceful to you."



1. Sahih al-Tirmidhi, v5, p699

2. Sunan Ibn Majah, v1, p52

3. Fadha'il al-Sahaba, by Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, v2, p767, Tradition #1350

4. al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, v3, p149

5. Majma' al-Zawa'id, by al-Haythami, v9, p169

6. al-Kabir, by al-Tabarani, v3, p30, also in al-Awsat

7. Jami' al-Saghir, by al-Ibani, v2, p17

8. Tarikh, by al-Khateeb al-Baghdadi, v7, p137

9. Sawaiq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, p144

10. Talkhis, by al-Dhahabi, v3, p149

11. Dhakha'ir al-Uqba, by al-Muhib al-Tabari, p25

12. Mishkat al-Masabih, by Khatib al-Tabrizi, English Version, Tradition #6145



Prophet Muhammad said, "He who loves al-Hasan and al-Husayn, has loved me, and he who makes them angry has made me angry."

1. Sunan Ibn Majah,

2. al-Mustadrak, by al-Hakim, from Abu Hurairah

3. Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, as quoted in:

4. al-Sawa'iq al-Muhriqah, by Ibn Hajar Haythami, Ch. 11, section 3, p292



Ref: Nazr-e-Qaim Trust


  • SHAUZEB likes this

#14 Hassan2jz

Hassan2jz

    Bodybuilders Dungeon

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,305 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia
  • Interests:Islam and Politics, Being massive, Looking good, Expensive cars, Keeping it halal.

Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:21 AM

(salam),

Besides, Shias are not the only one to be blamed for this 'crime'.
Mausoleum of Imam Bukhari:


WaSalaam.

Majority of Sunnis hold this belief, it is only the Wahabis who promote razing of graves, needless to say, they can be ignored.

Hassan.

#15 Marbles

Marbles

    Bohemian

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 21,009 posts
  • Location:Hungary
  • Religion:Mussalman
  • Interests:Pickwick Papers

Posted 03 November 2009 - 05:23 AM

Why are we wasting more SC space on that idiot Naik? He is a chicane, a skulldugger. I feel like puking on his filthy beard whenever I see him yapping ad nauseam.
  • sayedzeeshan likes this

#16 Panzerwaffe

Panzerwaffe

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,171 posts
  • Location:USA ( my heart is in KUFA )

Posted 09 November 2009 - 11:44 PM

he is a wahabi fool who is blind in his hatred of shias

#17 Tawazun

Tawazun

    Member

  • Banned
  • 94 posts

Posted 10 November 2009 - 06:55 AM

I dont see whats the point of watching lectures and debates of Sunni speakers like Zakir naik, Ahmed Deedat, Shabir ally etc, their videos are meant to educate mainstream muslims and not Mukhalifeen ( non Sunnis )

ofcourse They respect yazeed and Muawiyah, they are sunnis !! what do you expect from them ? to declare their wilyaha of Ali !?

As a Shia twelver you should stick to your own shia speakers like Ammar nakshawani and hassanain rajabali,

Edited by Tawazun, 10 November 2009 - 06:57 AM.


#18 Hassan2jz

Hassan2jz

    Bodybuilders Dungeon

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,305 posts
  • Location:Sydney, Australia
  • Interests:Islam and Politics, Being massive, Looking good, Expensive cars, Keeping it halal.

Posted 10 November 2009 - 07:43 AM

I dont see whats the point of watching lectures and debates of Sunni speakers like Zakir naik, Ahmed Deedat, Shabir ally etc, their videos are meant to educate mainstream muslims and not Mukhalifeen ( non Sunnis )

ofcourse They respect yazeed and Muawiyah, they are sunnis !! what do you expect from them ? to declare their wilyaha of Ali !?

As a Shia twelver you should stick to your own shia speakers like Ammar nakshawani and hassanain rajabali,


Muawiyah yes, Yazeed no, the only people that respect Yazeed are Wahabbis (and even then they are a minority, with the mainstream Wahabbi view being, he is neither liked, or disliked.)
  • wayfarer. likes this

#19 Tawazun

Tawazun

    Member

  • Banned
  • 94 posts

Posted 11 November 2009 - 10:58 AM

Muawiyah yes, Yazeed no, the only people that respect Yazeed are Wahabbis (and even then they are a minority, with the mainstream Wahabbi view being, he is neither liked, or disliked.)


Not only Salafis but mainstream Muslims respect Yazeed too, I personally know a Sudanese friend who's name is Yazeed

#20 shdnpk

shdnpk
  • Basic Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 11 November 2009 - 01:34 PM

Salam

Friends You have read and seen about his speech about Yazid yet he condemned those how were invlove in the Shadat of ahle bayet and i think so that he also curse those people how were involved but he did not take any name. Isn't it enough

HussaiN

#21 Tawazun

Tawazun

    Member

  • Banned
  • 94 posts

Posted 11 November 2009 - 01:37 PM

Salam

Friends You have read and seen about his speech about Yazid yet he condemned those how were invlove in the Shadat of ahle bayet and i think so that he also curse those people how were involved but he did not take any name. Isn't it enough

HussaiN


Enough what ? to label me as nasibi, guess what ? I'm nasibi, in fact the majority of Muslims are !! surprise surprise !!

#22 ahlussunnah

ahlussunnah

    almost banned

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPip
  • 205 posts
  • Location:India

Posted 11 November 2009 - 01:59 PM

all those who disagree with them are Nasibis, no matter how much one claim to love Ahlul Bayt.

#23 Aabiss_Shakari

Aabiss_Shakari

    http://www.abubakr.org

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,379 posts
  • Location:Shia Chat
  • Religion:True Shia Twelver Islam

Posted 12 November 2009 - 07:41 PM

(salam) He is such a fool. While defending Yazeed (Maloon) he has gone to such an extent to deny history. History is full of crimes of Yazeed (Mal'oon) but this pathetic idiot is trying to defend him (maloon).
  • askar_r likes this

#24 Aabiss_Shakari

Aabiss_Shakari

    http://www.abubakr.org

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,379 posts
  • Location:Shia Chat
  • Religion:True Shia Twelver Islam

Posted 12 November 2009 - 08:00 PM

(salam)

Ya Sunnis i am ready to admit that Shias martyred Imam Hussain (as) but can you reply me this simple question that How many hadiths were taken by your hadith scholars from 9 sons of Imam Hussain (as)? Please mention number of hadiths reported from each of those imams. I am not asking about hadiths reported from Ali (as), Hassan (as) or Hussain (as). I am asking those reported by the imams after them.

Jaahil Zakir Naik i challenge you. You are just an idiot. Just tell me How it is possible that a nation who betrayed Imam Hussain (as) remained with his descendant Imams and the imams remained training them and teaching them while the nation which did not betrayed Imam Hussain (as) did not take hadiths from them. Factually you son of Muawvia (LA) your forefathers martyred Imam Hussain (as) and now burning in deepest hell. They will keep burning forever.
  • saba fatima naqvi likes this

#25 Lord Botta

Lord Botta

    Member

  • Unregistered
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,642 posts
  • Religion:Ahlul Sunnah wal Jama'a

Posted 12 November 2009 - 10:03 PM

How many hadiths were taken by your hadith scholars from 9 sons of Imam Hussain (as)? Please mention number of hadiths reported from each of those imams. I am not asking about hadiths reported from Ali (as), Hassan (as) or Hussain (as). I am asking those reported by the imams after them.


Do you know how many hadiths are narrated by Al-Hussain in the Four Books?



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users