Jump to content
guest 34193

Banned Members

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

(bismillah)

(salam)

A quick announcement so that folks be clear on an important issue. As folks should already know (and common sense dictate anyhow) once a member has been banned, this is not an invitation for them to go ahead and create a new account under a new username. Some individuals however don't seem to get that point, and will repeatedly attempt to come back under new aliases. It often isn't too hard to spot the offender though, and for an admin to then ban them. However, it results in an annoying cycle of ban, re-register, ban again, and so on, much to our chagrin and to the detriment of the forum's quality (after all, there's a reason they were banned in the first place.)

As such, the rules have been amended to clarify what will happen to repeat offenders of banned account (originally left it a bit vague with something like will be banned immediately with further punishment or something). Now it reads:

If a member is issued with a suspension or ban, they are not allowed to register a new account to post whilst restrictions are in place. Suspensions and bans are given for a reason, and a member is expected to respect and abide by the decisions made by the Moderating team. If a member registers another account whilst suspended/banned, that account will be banned immediately, and posts from the new account deleted as well as the account itself.

So, if someone gets banned, and they come back posting again, they should realize that all the hard work they're doing in ruining our forum will get erased once they are caught, in sha Allah. The point of this and other policies is not for the admins and mods to act like autocrats, but to try to improve the overall quality and experience of the site for all of us (non-banned) members.

wa salaam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam)

In order to raise public awareness and be more transparent, ShiaChat moderating staff will, henceforth, now communicate the reasons when a user account is banned.

With this step, our intention is not to humiliate or launch an offensive attack against any individual but to keep the system open and unambiguous, with regards to the reasons which warranted a ban for a user. It may also serve as a warning to others.

Edited by Zareen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam)

ShiaChat user Abdul-Rahman Brent was banned on 11/07/09 for the following reasons

i) Insulting other members (multiple occasions)

ii) Creating multiple accounts while in suspension

iii) Insulting marja e taqlid

iv) Cursing the three caliphs (multiple occasions)

Edited by Zareen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honorable Army Doctor banned. Previously banned member thaqalain, aka Analytical aka Hawler aka Fatema_Sadaat aka Hawler1 aka Shansal aka Hassan_Fallah aka Montazer al-Zaidi aka Montadher Al Zaidi aka Montazer Al-Zaidi aka Monthadher Al-Zaidi (yeah, seems to have liked that name...) aka FA_Shanshal and I don't know how many other accounts.

Yes folks, now you can get a taste for what we get to deal with as mods and admins...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Banned member Naziri (aka Three Temples Kung Fu and a number of other accounts) banned under his latest accounts. enemy_of_the_oppressor (listing his religion as Islam Shia) and Isawiyyah (listing his religion as Judaism). Micah, do you think we're idiots that we wouldn't catch on when you're _that_ obvious?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

alial1234 and his other accounts (dove987, mkm454) banned. Multiple violations which were explained to him. And no folks, creating threads to complain about it and PMing/profile commenting mods to try to get it changed when you're under mod preview is _not_ a good way to get off of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

alial1234 and his other accounts (dove987, mkm454) banned. Multiple violations which were explained to him. And no folks, creating threads to complain about it and PMing/profile commenting mods to try to get it changed when you're under mod preview is _not_ a good way to get off of it.

add the latest (narayhaidari) to the banned list. just give it up bro.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

xfrodobagginsx banned. Christians and other non-Muslims and non-Shi`as are welcome on the site. What's not welcome is using it as your vehicle of proselytizing against our religion, denouncing the latter, denouncing Allah, and trying to convince Muslims to apostate and join your religion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Khamanei_Rahbar and The Ultimate (appeared to be the same person) banned. Continually posting links to a certain forum after being warned not to. We also don't take kindly to pretending to be something (hardcore WF supporter) when you're really the opposite trying to stir up trouble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Newbie and Moslem-Ibn-Aqeel. Both previously banned under other accounts. Rules are rules folks, banning means banning. Not create another account and go at it again.

the latter back as Ibn-Abbas. Re-banned as per site rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • First Tesla in Iran https://financialtribune.com/articles/economy-auto/66088/a-tesla-in-iran-first-driverless-car-experience   http://en.tehran.ir/default.aspx?tabid=77&ArticleId=7728  
    • Yes Brother, the words "haqq" as well as  "meezan" 
      اللَّهُ الَّذِي أَنزَلَ الْكِتَابَ بِالْحَقِّ وَالْمِيزَانَ وَمَا يُدْرِيكَ لَعَلَّ السَّاعَةَ قَرِيبٌ
      Allah it is Who revealed the Book with truth, and the balance, and what shall make you know that haply the hour be nigh? (42:17)


      لَقَدْ أَرْسَلْنَا رُسُلَنَا بِالْبَيِّنَاتِ وَأَنزَلْنَا مَعَهُمُ الْكِتَابَ وَالْمِيزَانَ لِيَقُومَ النَّاسُ بِالْقِسْطِ
      Certainly We sent Our apostles with clear arguments, and sent down with them the Book and the balance that men may conduct themselves with equity; (57:25)

      But the verses of Chapter 43 always remain in my sight.

      إِنَّا أَنزَلْنَاهُ قُرْآنًا عَرَبِيًّا لَّعَلَّكُمْ تَعْقِلُونَ وَإِنَّهُ فِي أُمِّ الْكِتَابِ لَدَيْنَا لَعَلِيٌّ حَكِيمٌ

      Surely We have made it an Arabic Quran that you may understand. And surely it is in the original of the Book with Us, truly elevated, full of wisdom. (43:3-4)

      Again, I dont want to do tafseer bir-raye, just recite these verses & takes the taste of phrase "La-Aliyyun Hakeem". 

      This is the level of Quran with Allah, I know one more "Aliyyun Hakeem"...  a person whose name is "Ali" and he is also a "Hakeem".

       
    • «ظَهَرَ ٱلْفَسَادُ فِي ٱلْبَرِّ وَٱلْبَحْرِ ¨ahara alfas¡du filbarri walba¦ri “Corruption has appeared in the land and the sea بِمَا كَسَبَتْ ايْدِي ٱلنَّاسِ.» bim¡ kasabat ayd¢ alnn¡si on account of what the hands of men have wrought.” فَاظْهِرِ ٱللَّهُمَّ لَنَا وَلِيَّكَ fa'a¨hir all¡humma lan¡ waliyyaka So, O Allah, (please) show us Your vicegerent,   http://www.duas.org/ahad.htm
    • Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5108651/American-mercenaries-torturing-Saudi-princes.html#ixzz4zFCVug9P 
        This may or may not be true. But I think it does make sense that the initial round-up of the billionaires was done by a foreign agency and not Saudis. The simple reason being that if Saudis had been involved someone would have tipped off the currents guests of the Carlton Ritz. IMHO.
    • We human beings are open systems, we need continuous interaction with environment to survive. The environment of space is not suitable for us, hence it seems impossible that we would evolve such organs which help us to survive up there. We are built to live on earth, that is the truth, we must remember that fact. And we should also remember the fact that everything has a fate, including this whole universe. So if we start planning to leave earth now, we would need to plan to leave the milky way galaxy afterwards.... 

        
×