Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
alideman

Was Muhammad Ali Jinnah Shia?

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

i've heard in a majalis that he is shia

just searched google and found more about it

Some historians link the name of Pakistan’s founder to Zuljanah. They say that Muhammad Ali Jinnah’s grandfather, a Parsi, did not have a son. His three sons had died in infancy. When he prayed looking at Zuljanah in a Muharram procession (a tradition called mannat) he got a son and named him Poonja Jinnah, the word Jinnah coming from Zuljanah. Historians say this inspired the Parsi family to convert to Islam and Poonja named his son Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?p...9-2-2006_pg7_14

The firstborn Jinnah was soon joined by six siblings, brothers Ahmad Ali, Bunde Ali, and Rahmat Ali, and sisters Maryam, Fatima and Shireen. Jinnah's family belonged to the Ismaili Khoja branch of Shia Islam, though Jinnah later converted to Twelver Shia Islam.[6] Their mother tongue was Gujarati, however, in time they also came to speak Kutchi, Sindhi and English.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad_Ali_Jinnah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

His father's name was Poonjah Jinnah. His grandfather had no children and newborns would die soon. So he took a spiritual vow and when Poonjah was born he fulfilled his vow by cleaning the skin of a Zul-jinnah (the horse used as shabeeh during azadari) with the child by rubbing him against it. He named him "Poonjah Jinnah" which translated to (Wiped/cleaned by rubbing the Jinnah, or Zuljinnah). Weird, to some, I know, but this was also quite long ago.

Now, Jinnah probably wasn't an examplary, practising Shia muslim if you look at it by a religious person's view. But he surely was a Shia at heart and a descendant of a Shia. :)

Edited by Abu Dujana

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He was a Ismaili Khoja who later converted to Twelver Shia.

Jinnah_funeral2.jpg

The funeral of Jinnah in 1948 Shia flag (Alem) with coffin is clearly visible

Our great Pakistani leader was a Shia himself :)

Edited by Mrs F

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quaide Azam can not be compared with them.

Jinnah admired Ataturk you know.

Besides, at least Ataturk didn't sell himself out to foreign powers like Pahlavi did.

If it weren't for Ataturk, all of Anatolia would've been Greek. Ever thought about that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam)

As per his biography Jinnah of Pakistan by Stanley Wolpert, he belonged to an Ismaili family, and converted to ithna ashari Shi'aism on his own. His nikaah was solmnised in the Shi'a way and wakeels of both the bride and the groom were Shi'a, one of them an eminent Shi'a scholar, and the other the Maharaja of Mehmoodabad.

His father Jeena Bhai Poonja was an Ismaili, and the story about the name Jinnah somehow being a reflection or abbreviation of Dhuljinah does not have any reliable narrators. The only 'source' from which I have heard it is Zameer Akhter Naqvi, who has the tendency of recounting ridiculously untrue legends related to Islam, especially Karbala.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Was Muhammad Ali Jinnah Shia?

if yes, is this an alam at his funeral?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...ah_funeral.jpeg

A relative of mine named Hassan Jaffer in Mombasa is soon going to publish a book on the history of the Khojas. In this he has photographic proof of the membership fees (lawaajum) that Muhammad Ali Jinnah used to pay to a Khoja Shia Ithna Ashari jamaat.

However before people start praising secularists like Jinna, Ataturk or God-forbid the Shah, I would encourage you to read the following story of the great mystic Shaykh Rajabali Khayyat (taken from The Elixir of Love - www.al-islam.org/elixiroflove/) :

Praising the Tyrannical Monarch

The reverend Shaykh would restrain his friends and disciples from collaborating with the ruling government (i.e., Pahlavi) particularly from praising and admiring them (the officials).

A disciple of the Shaykh quotes him as saying:

"I saw the soul of one of the pious people being tried in the Purgatory state, and all the indecent actions perpetrated by his contemporary despotic ruler were being ascribed to him. The man being tried protested:

'I have not done any of these crimes. He was replied: 'Did you not say in praise of him that he provided the country with such wonderful security?'

He answered: 'Yes.'

He was told then: 'You were satisfied with his actions; he made all these crimes to secure his kingdom'."

In Nahjul-Balagha, Imam Ali (a) is quoted as saying:

"Whoever is content with conducts of some other people, he is like the one who has collaborated with them in those actions; and whoever perpetrates a falsehood two sins are recorded for him: One for doing it, and the other for being content with it."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • Verdicts & final judgement of whom? Is there a possibility that those verdicts & judgements be wrong? Or you're specifically talking about the verdicts & judgements of "Rasikhoona fil ilm"?
    • if four witnesses accused of stealing, you declared innocence, were innocent, but the witnesses were your enemies, is that a fair judgement?. The judge would not know, as the witnesses looked just like you. This happens around the world daily. Your statement is incorrect, it would not be a fair judgement, it would appear to be one, similar to how western politicians use this same concept to invade nations. It is a fair judgement according to their criteria. But those on the receiving end find it abysmal. The reason why you prefer B&W situations, because your mind prefers order and thus it is too simplistic in nature to consider options as it requires critical thinking. This is general for a majority of human beings, as there are too many variables in all cases including the B&W ones. Hence, if one were to analyse religion, its majority is based around this B&W concept, as order is preferred over disordered, especially in regards to the whole, even if we have collateral damage.
    • W Salam لا یستوی اصحاب النار و اصحاب الجنة، اصحاب الجنة هم الفائزون فما ذا بعد الحق الا الضلال قد تبین الرشد من الغی For God, everything is black and white It is for us, ignorant human beings, that gray areas exist, temporarily of course. ان تتقوا الله یجعل لکم فرقانا If you maintain Taqwa, you have black and white distinction in this life; and if not, it will be on the day of judgment, the day of distinction. هذا یوم الفصل جمعناکم و الاولین  
    • Either place right over left or left over right both mean cross legged. However, in Pakistan and India while people sit on the ground, they fold their legs like in yoga people do, but this is not exactly like Yoga but more relaxed, I think, I have to ask this question from my Maraja as well. 
×