Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
zainabia

Real names of abu jahl and abu lahab

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>can someone tell me what the names muawiyah, abu sufian, yazid, uthman, umar and ayesha mean? <<<<<<<<<<<<<

Muawiyah means a female dog that barks when it gets excited.

Yazeed means to over-do, above the limits.

The others i dont know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Salam,

was abu sufyan one of the companions ? sahabah?

Abu Lahab's wife -----> Umm Jamil (Abu Sufyan's sister).

This is a bit funny if this is true.  Because Wahabi's like to argue that Abu Bakr is a great great great grandfather of Imam Jafar (as)  ...through Imam Jafar's (as) great grandma  lol

If Abu Sufyan is one of the companions, the best person compared to us because he is from the best of generations,  his sister was the wife of the man who is cursed in the Quran ( abu lahab ).  That's a much closer relation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

bismillah

(salam)

Our Ahle-Sunnah brothers ask us if Maulla Ali (as) didn't like Sheikhain, then why he gave his sons the names after the names of sheikhain.

But I notice that name of Jamil is still common in Arabs.

And what about real name of Abu Jahl?

Was Salam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If Abu Sufyan is one of the companions, the best person compared to us because he is from the best of generations,  his sister was the wife of the man who is cursed in the Quran ( abu lahab ).  That's a much closer relation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam),

Once again, relation means nothing, it has no connection to one being pious or not.

There have been many relations which show this.

I have mentioned on this site a few of them, such as the wife of Yazid LA. She was the one who came with water in the prison of Damascus to give to the thirsty children.

This doesn't mean that Yazid was good or his wife was bad.

Wa'salaam

Asad Ali.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Asalaam Alaikum,

Relations mean nothing unless you hve the acts to back them up.

Like for example, we shias are ordered to respect the syeds.  Muhammad(saws) order.  Men are not allowed to marry syed women.

Most shias have become bent, they end up marrying syed women.  Hence, you kill descendents of pure Imams(sa).

I remember a marajah being very strict in this.

Alhamdullilah, Inshallah we all get stronger and appreciate what we know!

wasalaam

Ya Ali Madad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Asalaam Alaikum,

Relations mean nothing unless you hve the acts to back them up.

Like for example, we shias are ordered to respect the syeds.  Muhammad(saws) order.  Men are not allowed to marry syed women.

Most shias have become bent, they end up marrying syed women.  Hence, you kill descendents of pure Imams(sa).

I remember a marajah being very strict in this.

Alhamdullilah, Inshallah we all get stronger and appreciate what we know!

wasalaam

Ya Ali Madad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Salam alaikum wa rahmatullah wa barakatuhu,

Bro baatil ka kaatil

Once again, relation means nothing, it has no connection to one being pious or not.

Bro Hussain

Ramlah bint Abu Sufyan (Umm Habiba) was the wife of the Prophet  , so that's colse relation, too. Isn't it?

Exactly my point :)  , thanks bro baatil ka kaatil, and bro Hussain :)

The argument of possible family ( relative ) relations between Abu Bakr, Umar, or Uthman with Ali (as) and ahlul-bayt (as) is not a strong one.

Edited By Mujahid on 1033634115

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam),

Like for example, we shias are ordered to respect the syeds.  Muhammad(saws) order.  Men are not allowed to marry syed women.

Bro this is not true.

[i:post_uid0]Question:

Some of the progeny of the purified household (i. e. the descendants of the Prophet) do not marry their daughters except to sayyids. What is your opinion on this?

Answer:

* This is in no way Islamic, nor has any study of the life of the Imams of Ahlulbayt shown that it was their practice. In fact, their biographical studies show quite the opposite, for in Islam, there is no class-based differentiation or discrimination in marriage.

--Ayat. Fadlullah

"Issue 11. There is no problem in marriages between an arab woman with a non-arab man, and between a Hashemite woman and a non-Hashemite (man) and vice versa. And similarly, there is no problem in marriage between the noble families of a society, with the people from the lower stage on the ladder of society, such as those who swipe the streets from dirt*; because a muslim is en par with a muslim, and a mu'min is on equal level of a mu'minah and some mu'mins are the equals of other mu'mins, the way it has reached us through ahadith, but marriage with a fasiq (great sinner), especially wine drinkers and those who commit fornication - even though it may have been in the past - is makruh."

al-Imam al-Khomeini [r]

"Issue 1300. (It is) permissible for a free woman to marry a slave, for a hashemite woman to marry a non-hashemite man, and an arab to marry a non-arab, and vice versa."

al-Syed al-Khoi [r]

"Issue 221. A muslim is en par with a muslim and a mu'min is equal to a mu'minah according to Shari'ah, and marriage between an arab woman and non-arab man, and Hashemite woman and non-Hashemite man, and marriage between someone from noble families of a society with someone from the lower status is permissible."

Ayatullah Seestani Ayatullah Seestani[/i:post_uid0]

Please do not mix cultural innovations with Islamic Law.

Wa'salaam

Asad Ali.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The argument of possible family ( relative ) relations between Abu Bakr, Umar, or Uthman with Ali and ahlul-bayt ( whether it's true or not ), that that must of meant Ali (as) liked Umar, Abu Bakr, Uthman, is not a strong one.

Edited By Mujahid on 1033634629

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Asalaam Alaikum,

Imam Musa Kasim(sa) had 17 daughters, he never married off any of them?????????

The rule on marrying Syedzadis is a very strict one.  If a non-syed man marries a syed women then the women loses her syeda title.  hence, you have just killed an offspring of Imam Ali(sa).

I dont even know if your fatwas are true.  But as for Ayatullah Khomani(ra), he does not state syeds.  Besides, from his students I know that it is utterly forbidden.

you do have new shias sects which have no respect for these syeds.  Iqbalis and Dakoos.

I can put my life on it that I heard correctly from learned scholars that you are not allowed!

If you want to, then you'll find out!

Ya Ali Madad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam),

You really need to research on the subject.

I dont even know if [u:post_uid0]your[/u:post_uid0] fatwas are true.  But as for Ayatullah Khomani(ra), he does not state syeds.  Besides, from his students I know that it is utterly forbidden.

Firstly, these aren't my Fatwahs'. Secondly Imam Khomenis' daughter who is a Syed is married to a Non Syed.

I don't think his daughter who is a pious Muslimah would go against the so called [i:post_uid0]ruling[/i:post_uid0] of her father.

If a non-syed man marries a syed women then the women loses her syeda title.  hence, you have just killed an offspring of Imam Ali(sa)

Erm...

I can put my life on it that I heard correctly from learned scholars that you are not allowed!

Which Learned scholars? Be careful what you say.

From what i know, the only scholar to ever declare it Haram has been Ayatollah Mohsin Al Hakeem.

This was only in a province in Pakistan due to some conditions.

There are some scholars who consider it Makruh.

Allah knows best.

Wa'salaam

Asad Ali.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you go and talk to your Marajah.

As for his daughter marryinga non-syed.  I don't think he would allow it.

Taqlid, all our marajir usually have a common standing point.  they do not differ in their verdicts.  we are not sunnis who can choose what we want to follow.

In terms of fiqh, their are conditions.  as for marrying a syeda, I think most people have gone with their desires.

but the facts are obvious.  Just go and ask a proper pious man, he'll tell ya;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam),

Taqlid, all our marajir usually have a common standing point.  they do not differ in their verdicts.  we are not sunnis who can choose what we want to follow.

Not true.

Look at the Fatwah for mourning from the viewpoint of Imam Khomeni and Ayatollah Khameni, and then compare it to the Rulings of Syed Seestani and Ayatollah Khoi.

There are many things which they differ on. That is why we have [b:post_uid0]different Marjae'[/b:post_uid0].

The ruling maybe different but their interpretation regarding the matter is correct therefore there can be several rulings on one topic which can be correct.

Just go and ask a proper pious man, he'll tell ya;)

For your complete satisfaction i will E-Mail Ayatollah Khamenis' office and post the ruling once i get it here.

I therefore request Br Ya Zahra to get the ruling according to Syed Seestani.

Wa'salaam

Asad Ali.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, ask Agha Seestani, and Agha Khamani.  Was a very good idea.

By the way, when we emailed these people, and then asked the ayatullahs in person.  They gave 2 different responses on certain issues.

Do youthink someone else is mis-tranlating the fatwas.  If thats the way you have got your fatwas, then its no wonder that you have incorrect views.

the ulema of najaf all have a common standing point.  the british tried to say they contradicted each other, but they refuted the britih.

Hence, my words are finished!  you'll need to go in person.  words via internet are of no real meaning.  anyone can be a fraud ayatullah.

look at how sadam tried to use a dodgy fatwa under agha seestanis name?

i do suggest you go to your local mosque and ask.  if he's any good he'll tell you what is the verdict of your assumed marajar.

wasalaam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest YA ZAHRA   
Guest YA ZAHRA

Assalaamu Alaikum

In accordance with the Fatawi of Ayatollah Seestani, it is permissible for a sayyida female to marry a non-sayyid male, if he is a good momin and her equal in the eyes of Allah (swt).

The hadith of Rasolallah (saww) says there is no difference between the highest of Bani Hashim and the poorest of the foreigners but with faith.

wasalaam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam),

slave is saying that people can lie over the internet, therefore we cannot beleive any Fatwah of any scholar unless we ask him in person.

Slave, rethink your statement. No one would lie about such matters. If they did they would be knowledgable enough to know the consequences.

Wa'salaam

Asad Ali.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, Ya Zahra if what you say is true, then Salman Muhammadi(as) being called part of Ahlebait has no real meaning.

Ali(sa) and co being part of ahlebait has no meaning.

Mohammad(saws) saying that Ali(sa)'s parents being both hashimite has no real merits even though these 5 merits Rasool(saws) is giving Ali(sa) and stating that he has none of them.

Yep, Batil ka katil, one of the rules is that the authecity of the books is 100%.  The fatwa must be authentic.  The book must be authorised by the marjah.  

Else go and support that man made sadam fatwa about defending iraq.  He has falsely attributed to agha Seestani.

By the way, I simply repeat what other more knowledgable scholars have said.  

I just want to add, that there is no point in arguing.  We all want to be right, it's human nature.  Hence, i'll stay out of this argument even though I know I'm correct.  I have heard the marjahs:

Najaf:

Agha Basheer Najfi

Agha Seestani

indirectly from qum, via ulema that it is not permissible.  No example of any previous masoom giving a syeda to a non-syed.

Non-syeds should respect them.  Why did Habib ibne Mazail(as) want to go first, and felt so sad when syeda gave him salaams???

Learn to respect syeds, and go and ask these ulema first hand.

I'm simply gonna end this here.  Go and talk to Agha Seestani in person.  Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(salam)

hmm.. I've always heard that [b:post_uid0]Aisha means THE RED LADY[/b:post_uid0]

She was named Aisha because she had a red skin..and thats the reason Rasoolillah(saww) had also called her HUMAIRA (meaning the one who has red skin)...

ma salama

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam)

I see...

Well, as far as this bro. Slave is concerned , well actually I have also read this..that to know the authenticity of the Fatawa, A person should be informed by TWO reliable men, or he should meet the Ayatollah himself...

I dont know how is it possible for the people like us, to reach the Ayatollahs for each and every problem :s

ma salama

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest YA ZAHRA   
Guest YA ZAHRA

Firstly, Ya Zahra if what you say is true, then Salman Muhammadi(as) being called part of Ahlebait has no real meaning.

Ali(sa) and co being part of ahlebait has no meaning.

Mohammad(saws) saying that Ali(sa)'s parents being both hashimite has no real merits even though these 5 merits Rasool(saws) is giving Ali(sa) and stating that he has none of them.

Well these are the fatawi of Ayatollah Seestani. Could u explain the above statments you have made, as im slightly confused as to how u reach the conclusions you have reached from the fatwa concerning marriage to non-sayyids.

Wasalaam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

(salam)

those fatwas from Agha Seestani(ra) you have are blatant lies.  We went for Chelum to Karbal and Najaf.  We asked both Basheer Najafi(ra) and Agha Seestani(ra).  They both said:

NO!  NO!

What part do you not understand?

What you have in your hands is from someone who thinks he's agha.....

Name me any Imam(sa) who gave his daughter to a normal person?

Imam Musa Kasim(sa) never let his 17 daughters marry.  Why?

We had Bahlool(as) and Hisham(as).  Wake up, a new sect in shias has emerged, saying:

Syeds are normal, nothing special and such rubbish!

Their Marajah is a fake, and has been declared corrupt by the 23 Shia council of Iran.  Likewise with Iraq!

I can't be asked to re-write what I have.  Go and ask Abdullah ibne Saba, and he'll tell you to marry whatever you want.

not my fault you are after syedas.  but just remember, you marrying a syeda won't make u one!  secondly, you'll be against all approved marajahs.  thridly, you'll be a murderer of our Imams(sa) descendents!

Hence, you'll be cursed by us, Allah and the aimma!

Ya Ali Madad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recent Posts on ShiaChat!

    • easier. If you have the ability to cast a vote then I doubt you have to wake up, use the latrine outside, in the dark, or walk a few miles to get dirty water. Or work in sweat shops. https://ourworldindata.org/extreme-poverty/ Look up child prodigies, then you will notice a pattern in their households. Their parents had a method of direction, that allowed proper growth and those who had terrible homes, somewhere along the lines, they directed themselves using YT. it is all about the correct form of inspiration no matter the age.
    • assalaoalikum  which book or website contains questions and answer ,asked and given by Maula ALI (as)? post link for website
    • On the last one, why dont we have marriage help centers up in the west? If people can get married before university, even though a lot of corruotion happens even in high school, imagine how many would get married sooner?
    • Surah An-Nisa, Verse 80: مَّن يُطِعِ الرَّسُولَ فَقَدْ أَطَاعَ اللَّهَ وَمَن تَوَلَّىٰ فَمَا أَرْسَلْنَاكَ عَلَيْهِمْ حَفِيظًا Whoever obeys the Apostle, he indeed obeys Allah, and whoever turns back, so We have not sent you as a keeper over them. (English - Shakir) Obeying & Serving Prophet & the Ahlul Bayt (peace & blessings of Allah be upon them) is an obligation on us. Allah has made them our Vali. So obeying & serving them on the command of Allah means obeying & serving Allah. One should however be careful that he should not become "Abd At-taghut" ( servant of taghut) as mentioned in the following verse: Surah Al-Maeda, Verse 60: قُلْ هَلْ أُنَبِّئُكُم بِشَرٍّ مِّن ذَٰلِكَ مَثُوبَةً عِندَ اللَّهِ مَن لَّعَنَهُ اللَّهُ وَغَضِبَ عَلَيْهِ وَجَعَلَ مِنْهُمُ الْقِرَدَةَ وَالْخَنَازِيرَ وَعَبَدَ الطَّاغُوتَ أُولَٰئِكَ شَرٌّ مَّكَانًا وَأَضَلُّ عَن سَوَاءِ السَّبِيلِ Say: Shall I inform you of (him who is) worse than this in retribution from Allah? (Worse is he) whom Allah has cursed and brought His wrath upon, and of whom He made apes and swine, and he who served the Shaitan; these are worse in place and more erring from the straight path. (English - Shakir)  
    • Well, l am getting into my '2nd childhood'.
×