Jump to content


Advanced Members
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


About SheikhAlHabib'fan

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Religion
    Ithnā Ash'eri Rāfīdhí Shi'a Islam
  • Mood
    Ready to debate Omaris, deviant Sufis, Anti-SheikhHabibis, Anti-SheikhAllahyaris and the Dajjali Jamat
  • Favorite Subjects

Previous Fields

  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

3,258 profile views
  1. "If we had only three like Sayed Mohammed Al Shirazi, we would have controlled the world. " - Sayed al Khoei (RA)

    Source: Leaders of Religious and Politcal Thoughts in Najaf al Ashraf, Dr. Sh. Mohammed Hussain Sagheer, p235


  2. Ya Aba Abdillah al-Hussain!

  3. any albanian shias

    Yes. Assalamu alaikum!
  4. Who are the Dajjaliya?

    In a long tradition in Bihar al-Anwar vol 30 pg 40, the Nabi Salla Allahu ‘alaihi wa Aalihi wassalam says, “…Whoever make an uprise and he is not one of the Infallible Imams from my household, they are dajjaliya…”

    There is another tradition in the book of al-Malahim wa al-Fitan of Ibn Tawus from Amir ul-Mumineen 'alaihisslam, which also, describes people who lead movements to topple governments as dajjals (and that particular narration, even explicitly mentions that they would be dajjals if they are syeds) and followers thereof.

    - by Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha)

    1. kirtc


      you mean people like usa, israel, ksa right? because your sheikh thinks this is specifically referring to WF.. here are some questions to you and him...  Has WF ever sought to topple a govt? are their actions not defensive and not offensive... And 2. Who told you WF is not acting under the banner of the Imam a.s?

    2. SheikhAlHabib'fan


      Answer to your first question:

      Firstly, don't say WF - Wilayatul Faqih because I don't know what are you referring to.

      There is Absolute Wilayatul Faqih (proposed by Khomeini)

      Absoulte Wilayatul Faqih applied in Shura (consultation/election) or Shuratul Fuqaha (proposed by Ayatollah Sayed Muhammad Shirazi)

      and Restricted/Limited Wilayatul Faqih (proposed by Ayatollah Sayed Abu Qasim Khoei).

      Secondly, I assume you are referring to Absolute Wilayatul Faqih proposed by Khomeini, thus I'll answer your question as follows:

      Yes, Absolute Wilayatul Faqih was the stabilization of a non-Islamic government. I advise you to look at the example of Iraq. What have the scholars of Najaf (students of Khoei, such as Sistani) done? They let another government form, even though it's oppressive. They have asked to let Shi'as to perform their Islamic Laws, but have not intervened because as our Imams (as) have told us: "All governments before the rise of Imam Al Mahdi (as) will be oppressive."

      If you want to know more on what my stance is, refer to this answer by Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha), white which scholars such as Sistani, Khorasani and their likes in Iraq, Najaf, would agree with:


    3. SheikhAlHabib'fan


      Answer to your second question:

      Firstly, because Imam Al Mahdi (as) has condemned such government, all governments before his rise to be more exact.

      Secondly, because there is no proof that the Wilayah of the Faqih is Absolute, rather, there is evidence that the Wilayah of the Faqih is Limited to issuing rulings and Fatwas. Therefore, not acting upon the commands of the Imam (as) would mean that it's against him (disobedience).

      Thirdly, because the Iranian Revolution has been created by the US, in order to serve Israel and their needs and manipulate Muslims, here are revealed classified and declassified CIA documents, to support my claim:






      and by Henry Makow, well known for exposing Zionist agendas:


      and many more...

      How did all this fake conflict and manipulation benefit Israel, you may ask? Take a read on these posts by Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha), on his Official English page:



      and how he has taken out of the game many well known  marjas, just because they opposed his Zionist agenda of Absolute Wilayatul Faqih:


      And finally, my strongest argument that Absolute Wilayatul Faqih, or the whole Iranian Revolution for that matter, has been a manipulation, is this narration of our Imams (as) which in great details explains and describes the Iranian Revolution and condemns it:


      @kirtc, it is my sincere advice that you think before accuse someone without evidence for being a Western Agent. I'm not here to attack you, rather, to share the truth.

      You can ask Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha) in his Facebook Page and Sheikh Yasser Al Habib (ha) in his website: http://alqatrah.net/en/answers_section.php?section=Laws

      and they'll most surely answer you.

      All best! And As salamu alaikum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuhu!

  5. Mysticism

    Nope. Refer to my above post where I disprove the doctrine of: http://www.shiachat.com/forum/topic/235052019-mysticism/?do=findComment&comment=3075463
  6. Mysticism

    The Irfan (mysticism) Ahlulbayt (as) teached is different from what Sufi Orders or Tariqats teach. Check out these links: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WQakze06P3Q http://www.alqatrah.net/en/an125 We recommend leaving the worldy attractions aside and focus on Allah and religious affairs, however, many Sufi beliefs are deviant. Example, Wahdatul Wujood contradicts our teachings. We believe that Allah is separated from His creation and His creation is not a manifestation of Him, contrary from what Sufi Orders believe. Narrated from Imam Al Sadiq (as): "God is absolutely independent of all His creatures and all His creatures have absolutely nothing in common with Him. And to whatsoever the expression ‘thing’ is applicable is a creature except God and God is the Creator of everything, blessed is He, naught is as His likeness and He is the All-Hearing and All-Seeing”. (al-Kafi, vol. 1, p. 82) And..... <span>A group of our companions from Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Khalid al-Barqi from his father from an-Nadhr b. Suwayd from Yahya al-Halbi from Ibn Miskan from Zurara b. A`yan. He said: I heard Abu `Abdillah (as) saying: Verily Allah is devoid (khilw) of His creation and His creation is devoid of Him. Everything upon which there befalls a name, save for Allah, is a creature and Allah is the Creator of every thing. Blessed (be He) Who there is nothing like Him and He is the Hearing, the Seeing\ Many Shi'a scholars have condemned such beliefs, especially Shirazis and their likes. Even our Imams (as) have condemned Sufis: It has also been reported that Al-Hussain bin Abul Khattab said: “One day, I was with Abul Hassan al-Hadi (peace be upon him) in the mosque of the Prophet (peace be upon him and his pure family) when some of his companions, among whom was Abu Hashim al-Ja’fari, came to him. Abu Hashim was an eloquent man and had a high position near Imam al-Hadi (peace be upon him). “While we were standing, a group of Sufis came into the mosque. They sat in a corner of the mosque and began saying ‘La Ilaha Illallah’ (i.e. there is no God but Allah). Imam al-Hadi (peace be upon him) turned towards his companions and said to them: ‘Do not pay attention to these deceivers for they are allies of the Devils and destroyers of the bases of religion. ‘They become ascetic to relieve their bodies and watch to hunt cattle…they do not practice rites except to deceive people, and do not decrease food except to…cheat the fool…their worships are but dancing and clapping, and their praises are but singing. No one follows them except the stupid, and no one believes in them except the fool. Whoever went to visit any of them alive or dead as if he went to visit Satan and idolaters, and whoever supported any of them, as if he supported, Mu’awiya, Yazid, and Abu Sufyan…’ “Then one of the companions said, ‘Even if he acknowledges your rights?’ Imam al-Hadi (peace be upon him) scolded him and SHOUTED: ‘Do not say that! He, who acknowledges our rights, does not disobey us. Do you not know that they are the worst group of Sufis?! Though all Sufis are dissentient to us and their way is contrary to ours. They are but Christians and magi of this nation. They do their best to put out the light of Allah with their mouths, and Allah will not consent save to perfect His light, though the unbelievers are averse…’” (Hadiqatul Shi’ah, by al-Ardabili, p. 602). When Imam al-Sadiq (peace be upon him) was asked about Sufis, he answered: “they are our enemies, whoever is inclined towards them then he's one of them and will be resurrected with them. There will be people who claim they love us but they are inclined towards them and they try to be like them, call themselves with their name, and say what they say, whoever is inclined towards them he's not from us and we are innocent from him and whoever rejects them and refutes them he's like someone who performed Jihad against the disbelievers with the messenger of Allah (peace be upon him and his pure family)” (Safinatul Bihar, by al-Muhadith al-Qummi, vol. 2, p. 57). “Their wealthy pillage the provision of their poor. Their young precede their old, and every ignorant to them is an authority, and every assignee to them is poor. They do not differentiate between the sincere and the doubtful, nor do they know the sheep from wolves. Their scholars are the most evil of God’s creation on the face of earth, because they incline towards Philosophy and Sufism. By Allah! They are of the enemies and people of distortion. They exaggerate in their love for our opponents and they misguide our Shi’a and Followers.” (Safinatul Bihar, By al-Muhadith al-Qummi, vol. 2, p. 58).
  7. Who is a Sunni

    @Mohammed72 Did Ibn Abbas (ra) commit shirk for recommending someone to say Ya Muhammad (sawa)?
  8. Accusations against Sh.Habib and Sh.Allahyari

    Ya Allah, when will these people try to use rationality. Sheikh Yasser Al Habib (ha) answers the same argument you used in this video: Brother, what I don't understand from you is how can you not believe in Sahih Ahadeeth?
  9. Accusations against Sh.Habib and Sh.Allahyari

    @Yahya313 What's your religious education? I sincerely cannot believe what you just wrote, has come from a Shi'a. If you love good, then you should hate evil. If you praise good, then you should insult evil. It's not possible for someone to agree upon two contradictions. You have to enjoy good and forbid evil. What's your point for claiming that the Ahadeeth isn't Sahih? No, Sheikh Yasser Al Habib didn't teach it to me. What's missing in the chain, or how does it contradict the Holy Qur'an? The prophet (sawa) was sent to spread mercy and destroy tyranny, praise mercy and demonize tyranny. Haven't you read the Noble Qur'an? So then, why do you call me for demonizing the enemies (tyrants) of Ahlulbayt (as)? Surely those who disbelieve and die while they are disbelievers, these it is on whom is the curse of Allah and the angels and men all; (2:161) (As for) these, their reward is that upon them is the curse of Allah and the angels and of men, all together. (3:87) Surely those who conceal the clear proofs and the guidance that We revealed after We made it clear in the Book for men, these it is whom Allah shall curse, and those who curse shall curse them (too). (2:159) But whoever disputes with you in this matter after what has come to you of knowledge, then say: Come let us call our sons and your sons and our women and your women and our near people and your near people, then let us be earnest in prayer, and pray for the curse of Allah on the liars. (3:61)
  10. Why I became Muslim (Sunni)

    Brother, he's concerned because his Abu Bakar committed shirk lol. Run @Mohammed72 run, because you're running out of replies. I have a question, why do followers of people who doubted Islam (such as Omar) keep repeating the same Stone Age arguments which have been answered so many times? @Mansur Bakhtiari what do you think of this guy, using the Ya Ali argument lol.
  11. Why I became Muslim (Sunni)

    @Mohammed72 Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha) has asked the followers of Abu Bakar and other idol worshippers to have debate series. He (ha) has challenged your scholars again and again, however, they keep hiding. I have a question, are you willing to debate Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha) and defend your religion?
  12. Why I became Muslim (Sunni)

    @Mohammed72 Listen to this Hadeeth narrated in your sources portraying Abu Bakr as a Mushrik.
  13. Accusations against Sh.Habib and Sh.Allahyari

    Firstly, I'm not a Shirazi follower, Shirazi (ha) also believes in WF applied in Shura. Shirazis are not against what you said, again this shows your ignorance. Because there is no proof for Absolute Wilayatul Faqih, and Ayatollah Sayed Ali Sistani (ha) doesn't believe in Absolute Wilayatul Faqih either, are you going to respond the same way to Ayatollah Sayed Ali Sistani (ha) as well? Grand Ayatollah Khorasani (ha)? Ayatollah Sayed Khoei (ra)? And other scholars from Najaf? I advise you watch this video: Your complaining is not counted as a religious argument, our Imams (as) have forbidden uprising during the occultation of Imam Mahdi. Whether you will follow them is up to you, I have shown you Sahih Ahadeeth on PM. What other understanding does this Sahih Ahadeeth have? Please inform me, I'm interested on you knowledge. (READ CAREFULLY) our religion in not a revolutionary one, during oppression, we need to perform taqqiyah and wait for the awaited one. Your analogy is illogical and you have kept and still keep arguing through using assumptions. And finally, STOP CHANGING THE TOPIC!
  14. Accusations against Sh.Habib and Sh.Allahyari

    For most "Muslims", Abu Bakr was the first Khalif after the prophet (sawa). According to your logical fallacy, they're on Haqq. You say that nobody cares when you cannot deny the truth lol. CHALLENGE, if most of you believe that Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha) and Sheikh Yasser Al Habib (ha) are exposed, "...bring you proof, if you are truthful... (Al Baqarah, 2:111)". You cannot base your beliefs on speculations, that's not what our prophet (sawa) and Imams (as) have teached.
  15. Why I became Muslim (Sunni)

    @Mohammed72 Your "arguments" are very weak and Sheikh Yasser Al Habib (ha) and Sheikh Hassan Allahyari (ha) have answered you points so many times loool, and I was going to respond until I saw @Qa'im had refuted you. I'm an ex-follower of Omar and have become a Muslim (when I converted to Shi'a Islam), however even your Sahih Ahadeeth say that the Omar ibnul Khattab was not a Muslim: Allah says in the Holy Qur'an: "The believers are only those who believe in Allah and His Messenger then they doubt not..." (Al Hujarat 49:15) However in Al Tabaqat Al Kubra by Ibn Saad, it's narrated that Omar said: "I have never doubted (in Islam) as much as I did in the battle of Hudaibiyah." How can you still follow a person who has these incidents? If he doubted in the battle of Hudaibiyah, what confidence can you have to say that he didn't doubt after the prophet (sawa) died, or when he (Omar) became the second Tyrant? Why not follow the Ahlulbayt (as) who are purified (thus cannot doubt) by Allah in Surah 33:33? You are confident on following Omar who was fallible and sinned, but not Ahlulbayt (as) when they're infallible. Furthermore the prophet had insulted Aisha in your Sahih Ahadeeth, refer to Sahih al-Bukhari Hadith: 4.336 Narrated Abdullah: The Prophet stood up and delivered a sermon, and pointed to the house of Aisha, and said: “Fitna (trouble/sedition) is right here,” saying three times, “from where the side of the Satan’s head comes out.” As well as when according to your Sahih Ahadeeth he smiled and laughed when someone insulted Abu Bakr as narrated in Nathr Al Durr by Al Aabi, vol 1, pg 150. Therefore insulting Abu Bakr makes the prophet (sawa) happy lol. Here you have your Tyrants exposed. What caught my attention was when you @Mohammed72 said we (Shi'a) commit shirk (I seek refuge in Allah) when say Ya Ali Madad, watch this video: