Jump to content

Mr. Anderson

Banned
  • Content count

    163
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

About Mr. Anderson

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Religion
    Shia Islam

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

1,223 profile views
  1. Sayed al-Sadr believes in Mahdi's Successor

    So according to you anybody can be a Caliph, the Caliph doesn't need to be a Hujja of Allah swt, like Sunnis claim that Abu Bakr and Omar are rightful Caliph because the Caliph of Allah swt doesn't need to be an Infallable and appointed by Allah swt. And the Successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh is written by name Ahmed pbuh and with his title Mahdi by the Prophet pbuhap 1400 years ago, and only an Infallable from Ahlulbayt pbut can become the Successor of an Infallable from Ahlulbayt pbut and can be given the title of Mahdi rightly guided. And Sayeed al-Sadr r.a. has made it clear in his saying that the Successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh is an Infallable and he is the highest chief of the nation, which is a position that only a Hujja of Allah swt can hold.
  2. Sayed al-Sadr believes in Mahdi's Successor

    Wa aleikom salam, Shahid al-Sadr r.a. is approving something very important, which millions of Shias don't accept. First he approves that the Twelth pbuh is not the last Hujja of Allah swt and there will be an infallable Imam after him and second he approves the Will of Rasulullah sawas on the night of his death where the Prophet sawas describes that infallable Successor of the Twelth pbuh and that his name is Ahmed pbuh. And the Shahid r.a. gave two options, and this was before he met Imam al-Mahdi pbuh and before he was sent to the Hawza by the Imam pbuh, and this was very close to the martyrdom of Sayeed al-Sadr when he got extra knowledge from Imam al-Mahdi pbuh which he revelaed to his companions, that the Messenger of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh which was already present in 1999 is from Basra, and this is what the Shias should be looking for. Sayeed al-Sadr r.a. gave two options - during the life of the Imam pbuh OR at the end of his year. Sayed Muhammad Saadiq AlSader: "And from here Imam Al Mahdi pbuh will appoint a Khaleefa(successor)during his life, or at the end of his year,so that he will become the highest chief for the nation of the world of justice after him,and the first ruler from the period of the prefered and righteous ones of Allah" Mawsoo'a of Sayed Al Sader p.645 Tareekh Ma Ba'ad Al Thuhoor So "during the life" of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh doesn't constrict to after the reappearence of the Imam pbuh because now, during his Major occultation is still part of during his life as the Imam pbuh is alive and well alhamdulillah. As to "after him" - yes the Imams sons of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh will rule after him, because Imam al-Mahdi pbuh is the Hujja of Allah swt at this present time, but this doesn't contradict the fact that the Imam after him which is Ahmed pbuh from Prophet's Will is sent before Imam al-Mahdi pbuh. Mufathel ibn Umar from Abi Abdullah a.s:"The companion of the affair has two occultations, one of them will be long,until some of them will say he died and some of them will say he is killed and some of them will say he left.Until nothing is left from his affar except a small part of his companions and nobody will know about his affair not even his children nor anybody else except the Master that will succeed his affair" AlGaiba LilToosi p.161 The Successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh who is an Imam after Imam al-Mahdi pbuh is the only one to know about the affair of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh during the Major Ghayba, so we have the Imam pbuh after Imam al-Mahdi pbuh present during the Long occultation. The Prophet Muhammad pbuhap said to Ali bin Abi Talib on the night of his death: "... Then if death approaches him, let him hand it over to his son, Muhammad the Entrusted of the Holy Family of Muhammad peace be upon them. So these are the twelve Imams. Then after him, there will be twelve Mahdis. So if death approaches him, let him hand it over to his son, the first of the close ones, he has three names, one like mine and my father’s: Abdullah (servant of Allah), Ahmad and the third name is The Mahdi (rightly guided). He is the first of the believers.” Sheikh Al-Toosi, Al-Ghayba p.150 So the Successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh is the first believer in Imam al-Mahdi pbuh, he is 1 of 313. So it is very clear that he is the first believer in Imam al-Mahdi pbuh, so he cannot appear at the end of the life of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh. Rather the Successor and Vicegerent of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh is sent to his people before him like Aaron pbuh was sent to the land of message of Moses pbuh before Moses pbuh. Vicegerent sent before the Hujja. Imam Ahmed al-Hasan pbuh has said: "(...This is Aaron, he was sent to Egypt before Moses, and by a clear Qu'ranic text: {And when your Lord called Moses, [saying]: Go to the wrongdoing people * The people of Pharaoh. Will they not fear Allah? * He said, "My Lord, indeed I fear that they will belie me * And that my chest will tighten and my tongue will not be fluent, so send to Aaron} [Surat Al-Shu'araa 26:10-13] These verses clarify that Moses requested from Allah to send to Aron, meaning, to inform Aron just like He (swt) informed him. And the call started by Aaron, and he prepared the people to receive Moses {[Allah] said, "No. Go both of you with Our signs; indeed, We are with you, listening.} [Surat Al-Shu'araa' 26:15] . This verse clarify that Allah answered the request of Moses (a.s), not only that, rather, Aaron was the one who remained undertaking the confrontation/encounter {So the magicians fell down in prostration. They said, "We have believed in the Lord of Aaron and Moses."} [Surat Taha 20:70]. Aaron came [in the previous verse] before Moses; because he was the one who faced them, and Aaron the Vicegerent of Moses was sent in the Land of the Message and it is Egypt, before Moses, rather he remained pronouncing and confronting, while Moses was present; because Moses asked for that. But Moses was the Proof upon him so Aaron would not pronounce except by the command of Moses { And that my chest will tighten and my tongue will not be fluent, so send to Aaron} Moses, what is he requesting? Who was the speaker? He requested that the speaker be Aaron, and Allah answered him, to the point where the magicians said they believed in Aaron before Moses, have you paid attention to that {So the magicians fell down in prostration. They said, "We have believed in the Lord of Aaron and Moses."}?..." Sayeed al-Sadr r.a. has also commented on this matter. "We did not find-from what we know-sufficient evidence about the return of all the 12 Imams, not in an opposite way or in an ambiguous way. Only a Nas(hadeeth/text) after the Prophet s.a.w.w to the Prince of the believers pbuh and his son AlHussain pbuh. And if it is not proven about all the 12 Imams, how can one use these reports?" Tareekh Ma Ba'ad AlThohoor page 641 Sayed Muhammad Muhammad Saadiq AlSadr إننا لم نجد – كماعرفنا ـ دليلاً كافياً على عودة الأئمة الإثنا عشر كلهم ، لا بشكل عكسي ولا بشكل مشوش ،وإنما نص فقط – بعد النبي (ص) – على امير المؤمنين (ع) وابنه الحسين (ع) . وإذا لم يثبت رجوع الأئمة الإثنا عشر جميعاً كيف يمكن حمل هذه الأخبار عليه And also how can Imam Hussain pbuh be the Successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh when Prophet Mohammed pbuhap has clearly stated that the Successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh is his Son and his name is Ahmed pbuh. The Prophet Muhammad pbuhap said to Ali bin Abi Talib on the night of his death: "... Then if death approaches him, let him hand it over to his son, Muhammad the Entrusted of the Holy Family of Muhammad peace be upon them. So these are the twelve Imams. Then after him, there will be twelve Mahdis. So if death approaches him, let him hand it over to his son, the first of the close ones, he has three names, one like mine and my father’s: Abdullah (servant of Allah), Ahmad and the third name is The Mahdi (rightly guided). He is the first of the believers.” Sheikh Al-Toosi, Al-Ghayba p.150 Also how can Imam Hussain pbuh be the Successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh when Ahlulbayt pbut have clearly stated that the Successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh will be from the progeny of Imam Hussain pbuh. It is obvious Imam Hussain pbuh is not a son of himself or from his own progeny, and it is obvious that Imam Ali pbuh is not a son of Imam Hussain pbuh. Imam Al Saadeq pbuh said:"After the Riser there will be 12 Mahdis from the son of Hussein" p.385/Burhan v.3 p.310/Bihar AlAnwar v.53 p.148 Abi Abdullah [pbuh] said: “from among us 12 Mahdies after the Qa’im [pbuh] from the progeny of Hussain [pbuh]” –Muntakhab Al-Anwar Al-Mude’ah, Sayyed Baha’a Al-Deen Al-Najafi p.353-354 Prophet Mohammed pbuhap is not a son of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh, rather Imam al-Mahdi pbuh is the son of the Prophet pbuhap, and the Prophet pbuhap can't be from the progeny of Imam Hussain pbuh.
  3. Sayed al-Sadr believes in Mahdi's Successor

    Not at all, you can't debunk the truth.
  4. Sayed Muhammad Saadiq AlSader: "And from here Imam Al Mahdi pbuh will appoint a Khaleefa(successor)during his life, or at the end of his year,so that he will become the highest chief for the nation of the world of justice after him,and the first ruler from the period of the prefered and righteous ones of Allah" Mawsoo'a of Sayed Al Sader p.645 Tareekh Ma Ba'ad Al Thuhoor As for the second aspect: What AlMajlesy mentioned is summarized to admitting the existence of infallible Imams pbut and righteous preferred ones in a society after the MAHDI pbuh that are existing. But the general rulership will be for the infallibles pbut."As for the preferred ones, they will be working in this world during a second degree and so the conflict of the narrations will be lifted. And I want to clear out from what was mentioned in this aspect is that the narrations about the preferred ones is clear in that they will continue to rule on a higher level whereby relinquishing this evidence is a false interpretation like the saying:"From Ahlulbayt there will be a man ruling" or the saying:"And if he reaches death let him hand -meaning the Imamate and successorship to his son the first of the Mahdis" or the saying:"O Allah prayers be upon the guardians of his promise and the Imams after him" and what is near to that in another supplication. p.641
  5. Who Is Ahmad Al Hassan?

    Sayyed Ali Kathim, Abu Righeef Also known as Abu Nuh From Imara, Iraq. One of the first believers in the call Authored books such as ‘The Path to the Yamani Call’ Biography of Biographies, volume 1 "At one time I did not have a strong connection with the matters surrounding Imam Mahdi (pbuh), however, some friends of mine did, particularly in the time of Sayyed al Sadr (may Allah bless his soul). Sayyed Sadr was the one who brought back the matter of the Mahdi (pbuh) alive taking all risks in the time of the tyrant Saddam (Allah curse him); this was at the end of the 90s. We had a feeling that this age was the age of the Imam's (pbuh) appearance. The situation was dire in the time of the tyrant (Allah curse him). The last few months of Saddam's reign were the hardest such that I would not discuss the issue of Imam Mahdi (pbuh) with even my close relatives and my wife. I would make false ID’s and move from one city to another to escape having to join the Saddam army. One day, in late 2002, a friend of mine came to me and said that people were saying Imam Mahdi (pbuh) had sent a messenger. He told me there were some houses in Imara which this messenger visited. “Let us go to one of these houses and maybe we could meet him,” he said. So we went there and some ansar started to make da’wah to me. Allah swt bears witness that they were educated men with high morals and standards. Unfortunately though, Allah swt did not grant me success to believe in the call as I did not respond positively to it in my first encounter with its proofs. I then started to observe this call with great caution as, naturally, at that time the cursed Saddam forces knew who identify of Ahmed al Hassan (pbuh) and wanted to find him by any means. So at that time, we non ansar, were worried about this call: if it was the truth then many of our friends and family relatives had joined whilst we remained on falsehood, but if it was false then we were worried that our friends and family members were going astray. We decided, to form a delegation from amongst ourselves. This delegation consisted of doctors, engineers, preachers, teachers and people from all walks of life. We gathered together, led by Hawzah students and clan leaders and headed towards Najaf. We did not leave a single door from the maraji’ included Sistani, Sarkhi, Hakeem, al Yaqoubi etc. The offices of these clerics told us to let Ahmed al Hassan bring forward a miracle if he was true. So we in our ignorance agreed that a miracle is what defines a hujja. Some leaders from our delegation went and saw the Imam (pbuh) and told him about the demand for a miracle. His response was “Inshallah if Allah wills it and Imam Mahdi wills it you will have your miracle but on three conditions: the first condition is that you have to choose a miracle from the miracles that Prophets and Messengers came with, the second is that when I do this miracle, media channels and satellites have to be there to witness this miracle for all the people, the third condition is that they produce a document authenticated by them which shows the time and place of the miracle that is to be performed.” We returned to the scholars and representatives of the maraji’ and told them Ahmed al Hassan has agreed, with the following conditions... They were enraged and asked us, “Why did you go to Ahmed al Hassan?!” We asked, “Why do you mean...‘why’? You told us to do so.” They kept saying, “No, go home, this man is crazy and he is deluded etc.” Snakes!!! They changed their word. The Imam (pbuh) had told those who met him from our delegation that when they went back to the offices of the maraji’, they would expel them, indeed he had been right. They called him a magician and they said he had connections with jinn and spirits. They also said that he (pbuh) was an agent for Saddam, Allah curse him. Of course I was surprised at these so called scholars and the way they lied and were unjust towards him (pbuh). When we went back some of us pledged allegiance to him. I, however, wanted to gain more certitude and knowledge in this great matter. I spent around three months investigating this call. I recall at that time that the Imam (pbuh) told them, “Let them ask him 100 questions and that if he answers 99 only then he is a liar and far is he from that. He told them about mubahala in the shrine of Abu al Fadl Al Abbas (pbuh) where he brings his wife (pbuh) and his children (pbut) in front of everyone. They refused to engage in that mubahala just like their ancestors in Najran. He (pbuh) told them let us do Qasam al Baraa but they refused to do so because they were afraid that if he (pbuh) makes a Qasam on them then they will only have two days to live. Until then I had not met the Imam (pbuh) but was already drawn to him. After months of research I still did not believe in the call; something was holding me back. When I knew that he told people to ask Allah about him, I was really moved by this especially when I saw how others would say ask person x about me and would never say ask Allah swt. So I stood before Allah swt and I said, “Oh Allah, verily the number of paths to You is equal to the whole of creation. Oh Allah, this man has directed me to you and has called Your testimony for him and You are the evidence of the perplexed ones. Oh Allah I know that You never cheat one who seeks guidance from You. O Allah, by the right of Fatima and her father pbut, everyone has claimed that his ideology is right, be they Wahhabis, Sunnis, Shi’ahs and even Bush (Allah curse him). O Allah by the right of Fatima and her father pbut guide me to the truth.” Then I saw in the Kingdom of Heavens in a vision, the messenger of Allah (pbuh) telling me “Support my son Ahmed al Hassan”, then I saw another vision where the prophet (pbuh) was laying down and I sat in front of him. He was wearing a white robe and a white turban wearing it in the same way as the ansar. He looked at me and said, “Do you know who are the worst of this ummah?” I said, “No.” He said, “Abdul Kareem Qasim and Abdul Salam Aref. This ummah is the most evil of Allah's creation as they rejected my son Ahmed Al Hassan (pbuh).” I woke up and immediately believed in him (pbuh). I decided to go to Najaf to meet him. This was my main goal. I looked and looked between Karbalaa’ and Najaf but failed to find him. I blamed myself and felt that there is no luck for me in meeting him (pbuh). I decided to meet some hawzah students who were next to the shrine of the Prince (pbuh). I asked them about his location, and whether he was from Iraq or another Arab state. They said, “This person is called Sheikh Ahmed from Iraq and he is from the people of Basra and everyone bears witness to his truthfulness and sincerity. However this man, unfortunately, we lost him because a jinn possessed him.” I was distressed but did not react; I left them and went to see another sheikh there who was the friend of a man that lived with the Imam (pbuh). This sheikh said to me, “He is called Sheikh Ahmed and he is from the followers of Shaheed al Sadr, Mohammed Sadq Al Sadr (r.a.); he did not believe in the Imam (pbuh). He also said some unpleasant things about the Imam (pbuh). However even he could not deny the Imam’s virtues. He said that the Imam (pbuh) would defend the poor discriminated students. He would try to comfort anyone, even those who did not like him. This sheikh also said that the Imam (pbuh) would always condemn Saddam and would try to expose his tyranny in front of the hawzah which trembled from Saddam. The courage of the Yamani (pbuh) led to suspicions that he was a Baathist from the intelligence services Hawzah students would try to stay away from the Imam (pbuh) in Saddam's last days because they did not want to by arrested by his men. The Imam (pbuh) would shout aloud in the Hawzah in front of the scholars, “Is there any one amongst you who has some jealousy for the Qur'an?”. I headed to Basra and in my heart I knew this man was victimised. I met a friend of mine who was not an ansari. In his house, some other friends of his knocked on the door and entered. Allah swt wanted to show me another sign. These men just came back from the house of Ahmed al Hassan's parents. They started talking to my friend and I would listen. The area they came from is called Midayna where the Imam was born. These men met with the Imam’s uncle who was not an ansari but bears witnesses to the sincerity, wisdom, and strangeness of this character. Whatever he foretold would happen. His uncle also said that our Nasab i.e. lineage is cut. ( Unknown descent as Imam Ali (pbuh) had said ) His uncle also said that Ahmed (pbuh) could even tell whether a cow was to give birth to a male or female. After this meeting, I went back to my city and then had to move to Baghdad. I was alone there without any ansar near me. I was in grief because I did not have the opportunity to meet the Imam (pbuh). Then one night, I had a vision where someone knocked my door. I opened the door and found a man standing there. He said to me, “I am Ahmed al Hassan and I have come to you. I welcomed him in and he started talking to me about many things.” I woke up and I was pleased and perplexed at the same time from the knowledge that he spoke about in the vision. I thanked Allah and was pleased that I had met him. I went to Najaf where I told some friends there about my vision. Sheikh Habib al Saedy, Allah protect him, confirmed to me that the man I saw was Ahmed al Hassan. I then headed towards karbalaa’ to meet an ansari brother. I knocked on his door and he came out and stood in front of the door because he did not want me to enter. I thought he had visitors or family. He went back in and said, “Give me a few minutes please.” He came out later on and told me, “Come in, the Imam (pbuh) is waiting for you.” (Then Sayid Ali starts crying from the pain of remembering this joyful moment and losing company of Ahmed al Hassan (pbuh)). I immediately knew the Imam (pbuh) and rushed to hug him (pbuh). I kept on crying and weeping from this moment.(Sayid Ali then becomes very emotional on mic and struggles to continue). He (pbuh) then calmed me down and started to ask me about the condition of the ansar. I felt from that first moment of seeing him that I had found my real father and caretaker. He was like a doctor who diagnosed our problems and then gave us the medication. He (pbuh) would travel to all the cities that had ansar. He (pbuh) would take care of our families more than we did for our own families. He would observe our actions and redirect us to that which pleases Allah swt even though we thought we are right in a particular matter. A believer was once suffering financially. He thought that he had a chance to join the army after Saddam's fall to make some money and was seeking permission from the Imam (pbuh). I said to him, “It's your choice brother I cannot force you to do anything.” That same day we saw the Imam (pbuh) after salat al ‘Asr. He said, “No, the brother cannot join the army it is not permissible.” So we told that brother that this was the Imam's response. That brother insisted that he should join the army and did so. He also spread rumours about us saying that we were Zionists and agents. He even started to drink wine and completely lost himself. Of course, his disobedience and apostasy made us more confident of the Imam's truth who warned that this would happen to him if he joined the army. Then one ansari brother told the Imam (pbuh) that a crow had flown. So the Imam (pbuh) looked at him and said, “What?”. He said, “A crow has flown.”So the Imam (pbuh) was displeased and said to him, “Who told you to call him a crow! It is enough that he bore witness one day that I am the messenger of Imam Mahdi (pbuh). So why are you happy?!?! Iblees has defeated you and you are the ones who lost!!! Do not backbite your brother, go look for him and see if he or his family need anything.”
  6. request a permission to use this topic

    @mrbasserby, Nasser Mohammed who claims Allah swt did not send any authority for Imam Mohammed son of al-Hassan a.s. was already exposed by Imam Ahmed al-Hasan a.s. Imam a.s. wrote 4 years ago: "On this page, I saw that someone posted a letter directed to me from a person named Nasser Muhammad who falsely claims to be the Mahdi, lying and with no legitimate proof. So he is like Musaylima and Sajjah and other liars in the time of the Messenger of Allah Muhammad pbuhap. And this liar, Nasser Muhammad, requests to make a mubahala with me, and in his statement, he wrote a mubahala in a format different than the legitimate format, due to his ignorance about the legitimate format of a mubahala. Anyhow, with his mubahala and with what he stipulated for himself, he made it easy for us to prove our truth to him and to others who are deluded about his honesty. And he made it easy for us to prove his falsehood and his lying to them.In his statement, Nasser Muhammad said,“And after we make our mubahala, if Allah doesn’t disfigure you into a pig within a second after the mubahala, then I am not the truthfully awaited Mahdi.”He also said, “And Allah has not sent down any authority for Muhammad al-Hassan al-Askari or for Ahmad al-Hassan the Iraqi, who calls himself the Yamani. And if Ahmad al-Hassan the Iraqi shows up for the mubahala on this website or on my website, the website of Imam Nasser al-Yamani, and after his presence and the end of the mubahala, if within the first second Ahmad al-Hassan does not transform into a pig then Nasser Muhammad al-Yamani becomes the insolent liar and not the Imam who is the awaited Mahdi.”And he also said, “And observe [the mubahala] between Nasser Muhammad al-Yamani and Ahmad al-Hassan al-Yamani, and see which of us is the insolent liar, but he will not, will not and will not show up.”So here I am, I am present for the mubahala after I received the statement of Nasser Muhammad.And by my presence, it is made clear he is a liar, as he repeated “will not” three times, and as some say that in the Arabic language, this means emphasis, meaning that the one saying it is saying that the action after the “will not” will never occur no matter how much time passes. So Nasser Muhammad said “will not, will not and will not show up,” and here I am, I showed up and made the mubahala with him and Nasser Muhammad is shown to be a liar.And this is my mubahala for the one called “Nasser Muhammad.” I am writing it myself and publishing it on my page and on his website like he requested, to prove that I am honest and that Nasser Muhammad is an insolent liar by his own conditions:(O Allah, Lord of the seven skies and Lord of the seven earths, Knower of the unseen and the witnessed, the Abundantly Merciful, the Intensely Merciful.If Ahmad al-Hassan has truly committed disbelief and claimed falsely, then send upon him a calamity from the sky or a painful torment.And if Nasser Muhammad has truly committed disbelief and claimed falsely, then send upon him a calamity from the sky or a painful torment.)And this is the mubahala in accordance with the Quranic text, the Almighty said, {Then whoever argues with you about it after [this] knowledge has come to you - say, “Come, let us call our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves, then make the mubahala and invoke the curse of Allah upon the liars.”} Surat Aal-e-Imran (The Family of Imran) 3:61And after I have written the mubahala by the legitimate format and published it, nothing happened to me but good. And here I am, after making the mubahala with this liar, enjoying the blessing of Allah and His favor, so now it is made clear to Nasser Muhammad and those whom he has deceived that I am the truth and that Nasser Muhammad is an insolent liar according to his own condition that he stipulated upon himself, as Nasser Muhammad said,“No one should make the mubahala with me except Ahmad al-Hassan al-Yamani who says that he is the messenger of Imam al-Mahdi. And Allah is the witness that he is the messenger of an expelled Satan. So if he steps forward for the mubahala and Allah does not transform him into a pig within the first second after the mubahala, then he proves that he is truthfully a messenger of Imam al-Mahdi Muhammad al-Hassan al-Askari, and he proves that he is in the crypt of Samarra and he proves that Nasser Muhammad al-Yamani is the insolent liar.”So here I am, I made the mubahala with Nasser Muhammad and with this I proved to Nasser Muhammad and to those whom he deceived that I am the truth and that my father Muhammad bin al-Hassan is the truth and is existent, and I proved that Nasser Muhammad is an insolent liar according to what he stipulated for himself. Therefore, his call is invalidated as a whole and in detail. And there is no excuse before Allah for whoever follows him or believes him after this day and after I proved with the absolute proof that he is an insolent liar and according to his own conditions. As for the liar Muhammad Nasser’s repetition of the lie of the Wahhabis and Ibn Taymiyya, that the Shia say that Imam Muhammad bin al-Hassan al-Askari pbuh exists in the crypt, it makes the people more insightful about his lying and deviation from the truth, as this is the era of the internet and any person can acquire any piece of information easily, and the books of the Shia are present and can be referred to in order to know that they do not say that Muhammad bin al-Hassan is in the crypt, and this is a lie repeated by the Wahhabis and by this liar Nasser Muhammad, may Allah embarrass him.And finally, I call Nasser Muhammad to repent and revert from his Satanic and false call, as his consequence will be worse than the consequence of the liars who claimed prophethood in the time of my grandfather the Messenger of Allah Muhammad pbuhap, and Allah will embarrass him in this world and the hereafter.The Almighty said, {And when a sign comes to them, they say, “Never will we believe until we are given like that which was given to the messengers of Allah .” Allah is most knowing of where He places His message. There will afflict those who committed crimes debasement before Allah and severe punishment for what they used to conspire.} Surat Al-Anam (The Cattle), 6:124. "
  7. A brief logic that will reject fake representative

    @StrugglingForTheLight, Prophet Mohammed pbuhap in his Will said that Imam Mohammed son of Hasan al-Askari pbuh is the 12th Imam and that these are the Twelve Imams pbut, and then he said that the Imamate continues with the 12 Mahdis and the First Mahdi is the son of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh. So how does this contradict with the narrations that Imam al-Mahdi pbuh is the 12th Imam and that these are the 12 Imams pbut? Imam Al-Mahdi pbuh is the Twelth and he is in higher rank than the 12 Mahdis pbut. Prophet's Will and the Narrations about 12 Mahdis after the Riser all proven to be authentic, the Will transmits from Imam Jafar al-Sadiq pbuh. Great Scholar like Sayeed al-Sadr r.a. did not see any contradictions or something going against reason in those narrations. Sayed Muhammad Saadiq AlSader:"And from here Imam Al Mahdi pbuh will appoint a Khaleefa(successor)during his life, or at the end of his year,so that he will become the highest chief for the nation of the world of justice after him,and the first ruler from the period of the prefered and righteous ones of Allah" Mawsoo'a of Sayed Al Sader p.645 Tareekh Ma Ba'ad Al Thuhoor Sheikh Korani who is considered to be one of those who are specialists according to Shia Twelvers about the signs of Imam Al Mahdi pbuh defends the Imamate of the 12 Mahdis pbut. Sheikh AlKorani points out the Tawaator of the narrations of the Mahdis in discussing the words of AlBayathi AlAmeli the author of the book Sirat AlMustaqeem who said that the narration of the will is khabar ahaad : And the meaning from his words may Allah have mercy on him[AlBayathi]:" Is that Shareef AlMurthatha may Allah have mercy on him defended about the narrations on the continuation of Takleef(religious accountability)and the general Imamate after Imam AlMahdi pbuh with his sons the Mahdyeen(Mahdis). And he said that this doesn't conflict with that the Imams pbut are 12 and not more because they are the origin and the ones who remain from their branches and their continuation. And he does not reject the words of AlMurthatha but excluding and taking responsibility at interpreting the hadeeth of the 12 Mahdis.As for his saying that its khabar ahaad/solitary reports, the reason is that he did not look at the multiple reports that we have mentioned and I have seen some of them mentioned in the sources of other than ours also! And he imagined may Allah have mercy on him that the Qyama is close to the nation of Imam AlMahdi pbuh, he didn't come with hadeeths from Ahlulbayt pbut and also his wrong interpretation from the non existence of the nation after their nation. So we do not agree that this is evidence of the short period of their nation pbut." Mujam Mawthoo'i liHadeeth Imam AlMahdi pbuh p.305
  8. Who Is Ahmad Al Hassan?

    An Ansari wrote: The clothes of Imam Ahmed Al-Hasan, the Yamani of the family of Muhammad: The asceticism of Imam Ahmed Al-Hasan pbuh in taking care of the poor ones like his father the Prince of the believers Imam Ali son of Abi Taleb pbuh. Imam Ali pbuh once said: I have sewed up my garment until I became shy from the one who sewed it until it was said to me: Don't you want to throw it away? v.3 p.272 Mustadrak AlWasael In this very night in which our hearts have been broken and our tears are being shed with blood I stood up at your door hearing you mourning and I'm in affection towards your breaths. My hands are raised towards you, seeking means of approach while I'm silent but my soul speaks while supplicating to you...I stood near your door waiting for you to use me. I used to do the works of the night of the martyrdom of the Prince of the believers Imam Ali son of Abi Taleb pbuh and I reached the place in praying 14 rukaat for the sake of Allah, and reading dua Al-Jawshan Al-Kabeer, 10 parts, and just like that. And while I was reading, something happened and I heard a voice which reached my ears and shook my heart and the voice got repeated. And it is to take pictures of the cloak of Imam Ahmed AlHasan pbuh which is with me and those who are his companions know him and whoever visited him, and the voice wanted me to take pictures of the head covering(AlJifya) and to upload it for all to see, especially the orphans and the poor ones from the children of Allah. So I said that I must ask Allah about this voice and if it was from Allah or from my own self, so I said to my wife that,' I want you to ask Allah about a matter which occurred to me and it is about the voice which shook me, so open the Generous Quran and ask Allah, to see if it is from Allah or from my own self,' without telling her the details about what this voice was. So she opened the Generous Quran and I asked Allah, and the verse was positive and it meant that the voice was from Allah the Exalted and Most High. So I told them about this matter and I prayed the Night prayers and I prayed the morning prayers and took pictures of Imam Ahmed AlHasan's cloak pbuh and it is sewed up from the bottom and torn up from the top and has numerous holes and is also worn out. And I took pictures of the head covering and I showed in the picture that it has been torn and worn out and he used to wear it and visit everyone with it. O brothers and sisters, it was during the night of the martyrdom of the Prince of the believers pbuh Imam Ali and everyone knows Imam Ali pbuh and his sewed up clothes....and the wisdom is from Allah in regards to this which made me upload the pictures but today morning and the martyrdom of Imam Ali ibn Abi Taleb pbuh makes the hearts bleed and among us is Ali of this time: Imam Ahmed Al-Hasan, the Qaem of the family of Muhammad pbut. I request from you, O who believed in the Will of the Prophet Muhammad s.a.w.w and the Imams and Mahdis pbut, to provide what you can to the orphans of Allah, the poor ones, but in an organized manner to the houses of funds, that are tied to Imam Al-Mahdi pbuh specifically. And excuse me and free me from any deeds against you, you are the pure ones. But as for you O my Imam and my Qibla to Allah Imam Ahmed Al-Hasan pbuh, I ask from you to forgive me and the apologies from the generous ones are accepted...praise due to Allah the Lord of the Worlds and may Allah make us among those who prostrate truthfully.
  9. Sayed al-Sadr's approach about the Yamani

    Emergence will happen shortly before Imam al-Mahdi pbuh, same day as Sufyani, not appearence. قال الامام الباقر ع خروج السفياني واليماني والخرساني في سنة واحدة في شهر واحد في يوم واحد نظام كنظام الخرز يتبع بعضه بعضا فيكون الياس من كل وجه بحار الانوار ج 52/208 Imam Al-Baqer a.s said:"Khorooj" Emergence of Sufyani,Yamani,Al-Khurasani in one year,one month,and in one day,arranged like the beeds (in a string) one follows the other,and so then despair will be in every direction. Bihar Al-Anwar v.52 p.208 Difference between Thohoor and Khurooj: Meaning of Khurooj"emergence": When Yamani,Sufyani,Khorasani all prepare themselves so they can go to war or when war/battle begins it happens in one day or one month or one year. Meaning of Thohoor"appearance":When Yamani,Sufyani,Khurasani appear before Khurooj, they will take years in order to gather their troops and followers before heading to battle. Similarly, Prophet Muhammad s.a.w appeared with his call alone and then Imam Ali a.s. was the first to follow him and then he spent 13 years preaching until 313 companions were with him and THEN he made khurooj against the disbelievers. So it takes a long process before the Prophet s.a.w makes khurooj to go to war and battle. Ahmad Al-Hassan a.s has appeared but did not make khurooj yet against the enemies until Allah swt permits it. He will make khurooj when Imam Al-Mahdi a.s orders him and when the Halaqa"the complete round of the Mahdi victors" are present. Imam Jaafer son of Muammad a.s:"The Riser will not emerge until the round completes".So I said:"How much is that round?".He said:10,000 p.361 v.52 Bihar AlAnwar Gaibat Al Numani p.307-308 So the Yamani will take time to gather this amount of great believers because not all Shias will accept the Imam pbuh and there will be a severe trial with the Yamani. Anyhow,Ahmed AlHasan pbuh said: "The narration says that the Yamani is the man of the banner or commander of an army and says that if he emerges its obligatory to stand to him or fight with him, so is it conceivable for a person to fight with a commander and he did not pledge allegiance to him before and believe in him?" "Do you think that they will appear and prepare their armies and fight with many armies during 24 hours for example? Does the mind accept this understanding?" Virtuous servant volume 2 p.47 And this hadeeth proves the point that was made, the Yamani appears before the Sufyani but will make Khorooj(fight him)on the same day. Imam Al Sadeq a.s:"Before the Sufyani is an Egyptian and a Yamani" Bihar Al Anwar v.52 p.210
  10. 1. The hadeeth that the scholars of imitation use in Tafseer AlAskari is proven to be weak and not only that but its content does not prove that Taqleed is obligatory because the Imam says:"فللعوام ان يقلدوه" -fa lil awaam an yuqalidooh-[Wasael AlShia v.27 p.131] "for the common people is to imitate him". From these terms it does not prove the obligation of Taqleed, meaning that Taqleed is not Waajib or Fard upon the one with the religious accountability. If it was said "فعلى العوام ان يقلدوه" it will then be an obligation because of the word "ala-على" which means on/upon the common people is to imitate him. 2. The second point is that a hadeeth with a weak sanad(chain) cannot be worked by for the Aqaed(عقائد) ideologies of the Shia because you need a Mutawaator(frequently narrated hadeeth)and this hadeeth that the scholars(Maraji3)have used is proven to have a weak sanad. And a hadeeth with a weak sanad cannot be worked by for the Aqaed/ideologies of the Shia Imamya and this is like the ABCD's for any graduate of a Hawza. Scholarly commentaries who've weakened this hadeeth are the following: a.Mujam Rijal AlHadeeth Sayed AlKhoei said about it:"The tafseer that is referred to Imam AlAskari pbuh, it is from the narration of this man(Ali son of Muhammad son of Sayar)and his friend Yusef son of Muhammad son of Zyad and both of them are unknown/majhool in their state and their narration is not reliable from the Imam pbuh, his care pbuh for their status and the request from his fathers is for them to remain so that they can benefit from the knowledge in which Allah will honor them by it" ومنهم آية الله السيد الخوئي صاحب " معجم رجال الحديث " قال فيه: التفسير المنسوب إلى الإمام العسكري عليه السلام إنما هو برواية هذا الرجل (علي بن محمد بن سيار) وزميله يوسف بن محمد بن زياد، وكلاهما مجهولا الحال ولا يعتد برواية أنفسهما عن الإمام عليه السلام اهتمامه عليه السلام بشأنهما وطلبه من أبويهما إبقاءهما لافادتهما العلم الذي يشرفهما الله به Mujam Rijal AlHadeeth v.13/p.15 and AlKhoei also says the following about Taqleed: قول المحقق الخوئي حين ذكر التقليد قائلاً : ﴿ إن التكلم في مفهوم التقليد لا يكاد أن يترتب عليه ثمرة فقهية اللهم إلا في النذر . وذلك لعدم وروده في شيء من الروايات ﴾﴿ - كتاب الاجتهاد والتقليد - السيد الخوئي - شرح ص 81 ﴾ Sayed AlKhoei:"Speaking about the understanding of Taqleed almost cannot have a fruit of jurisprudence built upon it, by Allah except in Nuther, that is because not a thing of it is mentioned in the narrations" Kitab AlIjtihad and Taqleed-Sayed AlKhoei p.81 b.Hur AlAmely in Wasael said:"This hadeeth is not allowed for the Usoolis to rely on it for their Usool and not even in the Furoo because its one disconnected/Mursel report, doubtful in its Sanad and content and weak to them" Wasael AlShia-Hur AlAmely v.27 p.132 .لحر العاملي في الوسائل قائلاً : ﴿ أن هذا الحديث لا يجوز عند الأصوليين الاعتماد عليه في الأصول ولا في الفروع ، لأنه خبر واحد مرسل ، ظني السند والمتن ضعيفا عندهم ﴾﴿ - وسائل الشيعة - الحر العاملي - ج 27 - ص 132 c.Sayed AlKhomeini:"With its weak Sanad/chain....it is damaged from the way of its evidence because its issuance was to clarify about most of the Jews from their scholars in AlUsool for He said: And they do nothing but conjecture" Sayed Khomeini-Rasael v.2 p.139 كنه مع ضعف سنده ... انه مخدوش من حيث الدلالة لأن صدره في بيان تقليد عوام اليهود من علمائهم في الأصول حيث قال : وان هم الا يظنون ﴾﴿ الرسائل - السيد الخميني - ج 2 - ص 139﴾ and also said: Sayed Khomeini:"The narration, with its weak Sanad/chain and vague content cannot be used to argue with" Ijtihad and Taqleed-Sayed AlKhomeini p.97-98 وذلك في قوله : ﴿ فالرواية مع ضعفها سندا ، واغتشاشها متنا ، لا تصلح للحجية﴾﴿ - الاجتهاد والتقليد - السيد الخميني - ص 97 - 98﴾ . d.Sheikh AlAnsari:"It is not allowed for Taqleed in Usool, if there was for the one imitating a way to have knowledge about it; either generally or in detail. And whoever doesn't actually have an ability to do that, he is then not someone with a religious accountability and he is of the rank of the cattle in which they are not obligated." Faraed AlUsool-Sheikh AlAnsary v.1 p.582 ﴿ لا يجوز التقليد في الأصول إذا كان للمقلد طريق إلى العلم به ، إما على جملة أو تفصيل ، ومن ليس له قدرة على ذلك أصلاً فليس بمكلف ، وهو بمنزلة البهائم التي ليست مكلفة بحال﴾﴿ - فرائد الأصول - الشيخ الأنصاري - ج 1 - ص 582﴾ e. The second martyr said:The falsehood of Taqleed in Usool happened unanimously from his saying:" The necessity of disallowing Taqleed in Usool by agreement" Haqaeq AlImaan-Shaheed AlThaani p.171 وقال الشهيد الثاني ان بطلان التقليد في الأصول جاء بالاتفاق في قوله : ﴿ضرورة عدم جواز التقليد في الأصول بالاتفاق ﴾﴿- حقائق الإيمان - الشهيد الثاني - ص 171 f. "Allowing Taqleed in Usool is a reason for the death of religion and its removal from the hearts and spirits and giving an opportunity for the atheists and infidels to spew out the mention of disbelief and hypocrisy we seek refuge in Allah from their traps and their poisons" Imaan and Kuffer-Sheikh Jaafar AlSibhaani p.92 ﴿إن تجويز التقليد في الأصول، سبب لإماتة الدين، وزواله عن القلوب والأرواح ، وفسح المجال للملاحدة والزنادقة لبث بذر الكفر والنفاق، أعاذنا الله من مكائدهم ودسائسهم﴾﴿الإيمان والكفر - الشيخ جعفر السبحاني - ص 92 ﴾
  11. Sayed al-Sadr's approach about the Yamani

    @amirhosein_88, wa aleikom salam yes my fault, page is 137, not 1. Firstly, you say that its a mistake and fallacy, who from the scholars said that AlJazari made a mistake or is it just you saying that? Secondly, in the book Usool Sitat Ashar, the Prophet s.a.w.w said:Faith is Yaman and I am a Yamani. This is in page 247 . الإيمان يمان وأنا يماني So did the Prophet make a mistake by calling himself a Yamani? Sayeed al-Sadr r.a. made a mistake saying "Yamani" is allegorical meaning and Yamani is from Iraq , Sheikh Sagheer made a mistake that Yamani comes from nowhere else but Iraq ? So everybody made a mistake, but your claim that Yamani means from Yemen is the truth ?
  12. The man with three names

    Wa Aleikom Salam, the saying of Sayed Mohammad Al Sadr (ra) in his book Tarikh Ghaibat Al Sughra page 641: He says regarding the religious account of Al Simari: Thus this narration is not sufficient, not even for confirmation of an Islamic legal ruling. And likewise, Al Mirza Al Noori, which Allama Al Majlisi has also conveyed in his book Bihar Al Anwar volume 53 page 318, 43.30 He says: It is one report with a disconnected chain of narrators that is not scientifically obligatory [to follow] and as a result, it does not oppose these events. He is referring to the events that indicate that Imam Al Mahdi has physically met with people [during the occultation], and sent people [as messengers] as he did with Sheikh Al Mufeed, depicting him as the medium between himself and the Shia. “So I said, ‘O Master, indeed Our scholars have narrated some traditions about the Companion of the Matter (PBUH), that he said when he was commanded to enter into the Major Occultation, “whoever claims to have seen me during my Major Occultation is a liar.” In spite of that so many have seen him, even from among you?’ So, he said, ‘You have told the truth, but he (PBUH) said that during that time because there was a large number of enemies from his family as well as from others from the pharaohs (tyrants/oppressors) of Bani Al-Abbas, so much so that the Shia used to prevent one another from speaking about or mentioning the Imam. As for the current time period, a lot of time has passed and the enemy has despaired; our territories are out of their control and we are safe from their oppression and through the blessing of the Imam (PBUH) none of the enemies can reach us.’ You can do so but you will easily be proven to be a deciever, because the real Ahmed al-Hasan pbuh already claimed the Will in 1999, so whoever does this after him is a false claimant, because the rightful claimant is the first who claims a divine text. Nobody claimed to be Prophet Mohammed pbuh before him, nobody claimed to be any of the Imams pbut before them, nobody claimed to be Imam al-Mahdi pbuh before Imam al-Mahdi pbuh himself claimed it, so we know that if somebody know claims their position he is a false claimant, because the true claimants already were the first ones who claimed their Divine position. Also the Imam a.s. has used Knowledge and Miracles as proof to back up his claim, interpreting the Quran and its verses, knowing the decisive and allegorical, answering any question that he has been asked. You can see in this topic at the last page, many testimonies of people meeting the Imam pbuh, even those who don't believe in him who testify about his truthfulness, also one of his deputies Sheikh Nathem alUqaili from the Office in Najaf, who testifies and tells his story how he believed , how he met the Imam pbuh, and the Sheikh until this day hasn't stopped his communication with the Imam pbuh. Al-Imam Al-Baqir "There is no banner better than that of the banner of Yamani, it is the banner of faith and dedication, because he calls to your possessor, so if the Yamani comes out, selling weapons to people or any Muslim becomes prohibited, and if the Yamani appears, stand up to him, because he's banner is the banner of faith, and its prohibited for any Muslim to turn away from him, and who ever turns away from him, then he's from the people of hell, because he calls to the truth and to the right path). Al-Ghaybah - Mohammad Ibn Ibrahim A' Noâmani p. 264. When a person accepts the Imam pbuh he will know and be told what to do. The narration about going to him even if you have to crawl on ice is when the Rise happens, when now Shias have to work towards making the Rise happen sooner. You can write to the Imam pbuh any question you would like and he will respond inshaAllah. There is an Office of the Imam pbuh with Deputies appointed by him pbuh that anyone can meet. The Imam a.s. is hiding from his enemies who want to kill him, like Prophet Mohammed pbuhap was hiding from his enemies, Jesus pbuh hiding for a number of years before he returned to preach his Call. Prophet Muhammed SAWAS hiding, so why cannot Ahmed AlHasan a.s hide from those who try to kill him? Abu Jaafar pbuh said: No one answered Rasool Allah s.a.w.w before Ali Ibn Abi Taleb and Khadeeja pbut. The Messenger of Allah s.a.w.w remained in Mecca for three years hiding, being afraid and vigil, afraid from his community and people. Kamal AlDeen from Sheikh Al Saduq v.9 p.328 Note: This fear is not of death and dunya, rather a fear of failing the religion of Allah,the spread the religion of Allah Far be it from the Prophet Muhammed PBUH&HF to be afraid of dunya. قال أبو جعفر عليه السلام: ما أجاب رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله أحد قبل علي بن أبي طالب وخديجة عليهما السلام ولقد مكث رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله بمكة ثلاث سنين مختفيا خائفا يترقب، ويخاف قومه والناس and in Quran: And he became inside the city fearful and anticipating [exposure], when suddenly the one who sought his help the previous day cried out to him [once again]. Moses said to him, "Indeed, you are an evident, [persistent] deviator." 28:18 This is Moses pbuh The Imam a.s. doesn't claim to be direct son. This has never been claimed. Prophet Mohammed sawas in his Will it is written Ahmed to be the son of Imam al-Mahdi a.s. , but he is not direct son, rather like Imam al-Mahdi a.s. is the son of the Prophet pbuhap. The Hujja a.s. was married many years ago and he has a long lineage from his marriages and here are the proofs and witnesses. Narrated by Sheikh AlNumani the student of the Thiqa of Islam AlKulainy in the Book of AlGaiba and Sheikh AlToosi in his book AlGaiba with two reliable Sanads from AlMufathel son of Umar he said: I heard Aba Abdullah pbuh saying:"The companion of the affair has two occultations, one of them will be long until some of them say that he died and some of them will say he is still and some of them will say he left until nothing remains on his affair from his companions except a small part of his companions and no one will know about his place from his children and other than that except the Mawla that will succeed his affair."Gaibat AlToosi p.160-161 h.120 Imam Jaafer(a.s)says to O Aba Muhammad the narrator of the hadeeth"As if I see the Riser in the mosque of AlSahla with his family and children.I said:Would that be his house?He said:Yes." Bihar AlAnwar v.52 p.38 Zaid son of AlHareth said and Sa'ad son of Malek:O Messenger of Allah we heard you yesterday mentioning AlHussain son of Ali and his father the Prince of the believers so he pbuhap said:"He will appear from the tribes of my son of AlHussain and lineage , an Imam who is called the Imam Muhammad son of AlHasan son of Ali, and a tribe will appear from his lineage that there count will not be reckoned and on their hands are the Muthari swords and the David armors and the Adnanite clothings and they will rise with giving victory to AlHussain as if they were with us and as if I can see them approaching the streets of AlKufa" Hidayat AlKubra AlHussain son of Hamdan AlKhasbi p.53 Ahlulbayt pbut testify to that Imam al-Mahdi pbuh has children, family and a lineage, and Aba Abdullah pbuh has testified that in the Major Occultation nobody will know the location of the Imam pbuh, even those from his children, except his Successor..... And also: Sayed Ibn Tawoos said about the place of Jazeera AlKhatra(the green island) which is proof that Imam AlMahdi has children:"And I found a narration which has a connected chain that AlMahdi prayers of Allah be upon him has a group of children, who are custodians with the descriptions of the righteous ones on the shores of the seas of the countries" Jamal AlIsboo p.310 by Sayed Ibn Tawoos Sheikh Mirza AlNoori: Sheikh AlKafa'mi reported in his Misbah(book) that his wife(Imam AlMahdi pbuh) is one of the daughters of Abi Lahab. Najam AlThaaqib v.2 p.71 Sheikh Nathem AlUqaily: It is unimportant for us right now to specify the lineage for the wife of Imam AlMahdi pbuh. What is important is that he is married in his occultation, as what Sheikh AlKafami mentioned. And it is not hidden that this matter is not subject to Ijtihad and opinion so that it can be said that Sheikh AlKafami spoke from the unseen. Rather, this matter cannot be proven except by the reports and Sheikh AlKafami must have observed what was not tramitted to us or what he hasn't observed. This is because he is a pious scholar, who is trustworthy. The likes of Sheikh AlKafami cannot mention by text the existence of a wife for Imam AlMahdi pbuh without evidence, especially that he mentioned(that Imam AlMahdi has a wife) without a sign that its a possibility or a saying which is most likely; rather, he mentioned it along with the wives of the rest of the Imams pbut. And concerning the count of the children of Imam AlMahdi pbuh, Sheikh AlKafami said:"The knowledge about that is with Allah". Misbah AlKafami p.692 And he did not deny the existence of the offspring of Imam AlMahdi pbuh in his occultation. Rather, he returned their count to Allah the Exalted and he also did not report about his family. A book from Misbah AlKafa'ami proves that Imam AlMahdi pbuh is married to a wife who is a daughter from Abi Shaib Sayed Muneer Khabaz one of the well known Shia clerics among the Twelvers confirms that Imam AlMahdi is married and has a lineage - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hK2BtgFE0s0 This is the family tree of Imam Ahmed al-Hasan pbuh to which 4 Iraqi clans have testified that it traces back to Imam al-Mahdi pbuh. And it says the following: " 1. Khizarwi Mohammed (tribal leader), I support the lineage of Mohsin ibn Saleh ibn Hussain ibn Salman and his truthfulness and honesty. And that the lineage traces back to Imam Mahdi (as), Mohammed ibn al-Hasan al-Askari a.s.2. Sheikh Shaya Ismail, I am Sheikh Shaya Ismail from the family of Faisal from the tribe of the progeny of Abu Muhammad. I confirm the lineage of Mohsin ibn Saleh ibn Hussain ibn Salman which traces back to Imam al-Mahdi pbuh.3. alMusawi al Hamami (son of a Marja) , this is the lineage of Mohsin ibn Saleh ibn Hussain ibn Salman which traces back to Imam al-Mahdi a.s.4. Mohsin Saleh Hussain (Leader of tribe Ale Mahdi (progeny of Mahdi). I am Mohsin ibn Saleh ibn Hussain ibn Salman and this is my family tree which traces back to Imam al-Mahdi a.s., Mohammed ibn al-Hasan.5. Sayed Saleh Aziz al Sufi, I witness and swear by Allah the Most High that Sayeed Mohsin ibn Saleh ibn Hussain ibn Salman who has his lineage coming from Imam al-Mahdi a.s. and he had signed approving his pure lineage. This is exactly the case. People are presented the Dawa, that Imam Ahmed al-Hasan a.s. is written in Prophet's Will 1400 years ago and he is the first to claim it. A false claimant cannot claim it. Also the Imam a.s. has produced infallable knowledge and miracles. The Imam a.s. has produced his proofs which a person can comperhend with his brain, he can see the miracles that are produced, he can read the knowledge. But there are people who still have doubt after all the proofs, so then they can ask Allah swt about the matter and also make dua to be shown the truth in a dream, because Shaytan l.a. cannot take the form of the Prophet pbuhap or an Infallable from Ahlulbayt pbut. This claim is not correct. There are different recitations of the Quran. Watch this video for proof inshaAllah Also read the words of the Imam pbuh about the recitation of the Quran inshaAllah The recitation of {with every matter} [instead of {from every matter}], in Surat Al-Qadr [Chapter 97 of the Holy Qur'an]Like I have previously clarified, some of the stubborn ones have tried to slander the Divine Call despite of the clarity of its evidences and proofs, they would use weak arguments that only reveal the wickedness of their clay and the greatness of their audacity against the Family of Muhammad (a.s). One of those arguments they use is: Sayyed Ahmed Al-Hassan (a.s) recites Surat Al-Qadr as such: {The Angels and The Spirit come down in it by the permission of their Lord with every matter}- therefore he is upon falsehood - and far away he is from that! - because he recites with a recitation different than the one present in the Qur'an copy, the version of Fahd which is present among the people today ([what is mentioned in the Qur'an's copy today is {The Angels and The Spirit come down in it by the permission of their Lord from every matter}]. With such reasoning/arguments, those Shia of the Marja's and the ones who claim to have knowledge want to put out the light of Allah.When I asked him about this matter, he (a.s) said:(They say that Ahmed Al-Hassan recites [by saying] {with every matter} [instead of {from every matter}], and this opposes the current written copy [of the Qur'an], and whatever opposes the current written copy is false, correct? Therefore, according to their reasoning, all their Usuli Scholars/Jurisprudents are upon falsehood, because they say greater things than that, just refer to their books of jurisprudence, and I am not going to say research; because they are full with accepting/approving of the [different] recitations, and this one says this recitation is more probable, and the other one says that recitation is more probable. Rather refer to the books of Fatwa [27] regarding the recitation, from the book of prayer which they have, you will find that they say that the Surahs (the chapters) of the Qur'an are 112 and not 114, and they say that there are extra two Bimillah [28]. Therefore, they are contradicting themselves; because they opposed the current written copy. That was firstly.______________________________[27] Al-Alamma Al-Hulliyy said: (Surat Al-Duha (chapter 93) and Surat Al-Sharh (chapter 94) are one Surah, they are not separated from one another in the same Raka'. Also according to our scholars, Surat Al-Fil (chapter 105 ) and Surat Quraysh (chapter 106) are one Surah.. ) - Tathkirat Al-Fuqahaa,' Case 233. And Sayyed Al-Khoei said: ( Surat Al-Fil (chapter 105 ) and Surat Quraysh (chapter 106) are one Surah, and also Surat Al-Duha (chapter 93) and Surat Al-Sharh (chapter 94) are one Surah, so do not separate them from one another, rather, they must be gathered together...) Minhaj Al-Saliheen, Case 605. And also other jurisprudents/scholars.[28] Al-Muhaqiq Al-Hulleyy said: (The third: It was narrated that (Surat Al-Duha (chapter 93) and Surat Al-Sharh (chapter 94) are one Surah, and also Surat Al-Fil (chapter 105 ) and Surat Quraysh (chapter 106) are one Surah, so it is not permissible to recite one of them without the other in every Rak'a, and there is no Bismillah between them..) Shara'i Al-Islam Volume 1 Page 66. Also Ibn Fahd said: (The second: The third: It was narrated that (Surat Al-Duha (chapter 93) and Surat Al-Sharh (chapter 94) are one Surah, and also Surat Al-Fil (chapter 105 ) and Surat Quraysh (chapter 106) are one Surah. So is the Bismillah repeated between them? It was said: No.) Al-Mahthab Al-Bar'i Volume 1 Page 365.The commentator in Al-Mu'tabar said: (If they were two Surahs then there must be a Bismillah, but if they are one Surah then the Bismillah should not be repeated....)Secondly: You have the book "Kifayat Al-Usul" and the commentary of Al-Mishkini on it; because they study this copy in the Hawza of Al-Najaf and they work by its commentaries. There are sayings [in that book] about the authenticity of the apparent of the Qur'an, have you come across this recently? Have you read the words of the writer of the book and the commentary of Al-Mishkini about the matter of the distortion of the Qur'an? Read it and you shall find that the writer of the book says that the distortion of the Qur'an is more probable, and Al-Mishkini confirms the distortion of the Qur'an by Al-'itibar and Al-Akhbar. Al-Akhbar is known, and what is meant by Al-'itibar is the flaw in eloquence or the cutting of speech or the flaw in grammar...etc.The scholars and the great Usuli jurisprudents of those ones say that there is distortion [in the Qur'an] and they declare that. As for us, we only said to them consider the recitation/reading of Ahlul Bayt (a.s) as the other seven recitations/readings which you accept. So what is the problem?!By Allah, I have once said to a Wahhabi: Consider the recitation/reading of Ahlul Bayt like the other seven recitations/readings which you read/recite by, so he became silent and did not respond to me and accepted my words. So what about those [Shia]? Even though that Wahhabi man used to say Ahlul Bayt say that the Qur'an is distorted and he would argue, but those ones have gotten blinded with envy that they almost do not comprehend a speech)And I have asked him about the seven recitations/readings and the seven letters, and that one of those who debated with the Ansar - one of the Sheikhs of the Marja's and their spokesmen - used as a proof the response of the Imams to what the common people say about the seven letters, and as such he would be saying that the seven recitations/readings are false. So he (a.s) said:( This [person] is not differentiating between what the people say about the Seven readings/recitations, and what they say about that the Qur'an came down upon seven letters. Sunnis say, according to their traditions, that the Qur'an has come down upon seven letters [29], meaning they say: it is permissible to say"Al-Aziz Al-Hakeem (The Mighty The Wise)" instead of "Al-Azeez Al-Raheem (The Mighty The Merciful), and so on. And Ahlul Bayt (a.s) denied that and they said: Verily, the Qur'an is one and it came down from One. And this has nothing to do with the Seven readings/recitations.______________________________[29] Refer to Sahih Al-Bukhari Volume 3 Page 91. Sahih Muslim Volume 2 Page 202. Musnad Ahmad Volume 1 Page 24. And many other sources.The seven readings/recitations came later after their saying about the seven letters, and the reason behind the seven readings/recitations is: after Uthman gathered the people on one version of the Qur'an – meaning one written text – and not one reading; because it did not have dots or Hamzas or [Fathas and Kasras], so they read the text in many ways according to what each reader thinks, so the readings/recitations became many. And it was during the Ummayyad Dynasty when the Umayyad authority united the people upon the reading/recitation of the reciters who are [considered to be] reliable with the people and with the authorities. And they refused that the Mushaf (the copy of the Qur'an) be copied or read - with the dots or the Hamzas or [Fathas and Kasras] - [using] the other readings/recitations, so they accepted seven, and refused the others. And you have the history of Qur'an, argue with them using the books and what is present with them and what has been written in the books about the history of the Qur'an.And the seven recitations/readings were all present in the times of the Imams (a.s), and the Qura'n would be written with all of the recitations/readings and the people would recite by them. So the saying of the Imam (a.s), recite like the people recite, means: with the recitation that the people recite with and they are seven recitations or more, and not one. And until this very day of ours, the one who has knowledge of the seven recitations recites by them all, such as the famous Egyptian reciter Abdul Bassit, for he recites with the seven recitations and if he reaches a word that has two or three different recitations, he recites that part of the verse more than once and each time he recites it in a different recitation)Then he (a.s) asked one of the Ansar to give a lecture regarding this matter, in which he would reply to this ignorant [person] and refute his argument which is based on that whoever says anything which opposes the current printed copy [of the Qur'an] - and I mean the version of Fahd - would be upon falsehood because he would be saying that there is distortion [in the Qur'an]. And he (a.s) said to him:( In the lecture clarify that all of the scholars of the Shia say that Surat Al-Duha and Surat Al-Sharh are one Surah and that it is not permissible to recite with [only] one of them in the prayer [30]. And bring forth their opinion, and also bring forth the traditions of Ahlul Bayt (a.s) regarding this matter[31]. And also the connection between Surat Al-Duha and Surat Al-Sharh, for it is clear that Surat Al-Sharh is not a Surah, rather, it completes Surat Al-Duha. Meaning, Allah is the end of Surat Al-Duha says: {And as for the favor of your Lord, do announce it/proclaim it} [Chapter Al-Duha (93) verse 11]. So what is this favor ? And why announce it/proclaim it? {Have We not expanded for you your breast, And taken off from you your burden...}[Chapter Al-Sharh (94)]. And Also Surat Al-Fil and Surat Quraysh are one Surah. And if you like, just mention to them the saying of their scholars in order that they don't be confused, for the people almost do not hear, so perhaps they would hear a little. Notify them, inform them, at least let be information and knowledge with the people for perhaps they would pay attention one day to the deception of those ones, and rescue themselves).______________________________[30] Refer to footnotes number 27 and 28, to see that it is not permissible, and it is agreed upon by all the late [scholars/jurisprudents].[31] Zayd ibn Shahham narrated: (Abu Abdullah (a.s) prayed Fajr with us, so he recited Surat Al-Duha and Surat Al-Sharh as one Surat in the same Raka')- Al-Tahtheeb Volume 2 Page 72 Hadith number 266. And Mufaddal narrated that Imam Al-Sadiq (a.s) said: (Do not gather between two Surahs in one Rak'a, except for Surat Al-Duha and Al-Sharh, and Surat Al-Fil and Quraysh)- Mojma' Al-Bayan 10:544, Al-Mo'tabar 2:188 It is up to Allah swt to decide if he prolongs the life of such people or makes them an example for the others. Allah swt made an example with those who are rather famous and known within the Shias and have a following of Shias so that their followers stop and repent doing the same . Also there is a difference between slander and making a Mubahila which is a Dua to Allah swt to curse the liar, which is what one of those who were cursed by Allah swt did, and also another well known Shia scholar who slandered the Imam pbuh from the platform of Basra . So there is a difference, of an unknown somebody slandering an Infallable from his home on an internet forum , and a well known Shia scholar who went up on the platform of Basra . Allah swt does as he wills. Give a proof of a Shia scholar who went publicaly and made a Mubahala ? Also are those two cases not enough for a Shia of the Twelth pbuh to believe in the Messenger pbuh sent by the Twelth ? Miracles are one of the proofs of an Infallable , however they are not decisive proofs. The decisive proof is that an Infallable Hujja and Imam has to be textualised, there are much more narrations that say the Imam has to be textualised and the text is Prophet's Will. Imam al-Baqir pbuh has said that Yamani calls to the truth and right path, only an Infallable can distinguish right from wrong , whoever turns from Yamani is from the people of hellfire, only if you dont accept the Wilaya of an Infallable you are from the people of hellfire, Yamani is best banner, so he is the 1st companion of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh. Imam Ali pbuh has said that 1 of 313 is from Basra. Also in Prophet's Will the Successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh - Ahmed pbuh is named as the first believer in him. So Yamani is an Infallable Imam - the Successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh and an Infallable from Ahlulbayt pbut produces miracles. If you read the following narrations InshaAllah you won't find it comical anymore. Aba Abdullah pbuh said:"Our Qaim if he rises, Allah will extend for our Shias their hearing and their sight until between themselves and the Qaim, he will need to speak to them; so they will hear and see him while he is at his place" Kafi v.8 p.241 So what is between the Qaim and the Shias which makes the distance closer, assisting the capability to hear and see the Qaim while he is at his place. We know that there are Shias all around the world, so how can he do that? And there is also a hadeeth which says that at the end of times, the Shia in the west will see his brother in the east. A miracle or is that time different than the time of Imam AlSaadeq pbuh?A time where there is Skype,facebook,MSN and other things that Imam AlSaadeq pbuh knows it will happen during the time of the appearance of the Yamani? "The believer in the time of the Qaim while he is in the East will see his brother that is in the West and the one in the West will see his brother in the East" So is this a miracle or technology that will occur at the end times? It's sad that people think that the Yamani will not emerge at a time of technology and he can't use these means of communication that are prevalent in the time of his rise. Its sad because its ignorant to think there is no technology at the end of times and we are living these times right now which follow so many other signs of the end times that even the Christians,Jews and many Muslims have admitted. إن المؤمن في زمان القائم وهو بالمشرق ليرى أخاه الذي في المغرب، وكذا الذي في المغرب يرى أخاه الذي في المشرق. v.52 p.391 Bihar AlAnwar The Hujja a.s. cannot be on Facebook because he is in his Major Occultation , however he has sent his Successor Ahmed pbuh as Messenger to the Muslims , like Moses pbuh sent his Successor Aaron pbuh to his nation first when he was away so they couldn't both do the same thing. And Ahmed pbuh is also a Qaim/Riser. And this narration is also for Imam Ahmed al-Hasan pbuh because The Riser here from this narration cannot be Imam Al Mahdi a.s. because its mentioned in the Holy will of the Prophet s.a.w that there will be 12 Mahdis and this Riser has to be Ahmed who comes after Imam Al Mahdi a.s. So having said that after the first Mahdi and the Riser Ahmed there will come 11 Mahdis pbut. Muhammad son of AlMathna son of AlQasem AlHadrami(1) from Jaafar son of Muhammad son of Shuraih AlHadrami(2) from Thuraih Al Maharabi(3) from Abi Abdullah pbuh he said:"And then after the Riser(Qa'em)11 Mahdis from the son of AlHussain" Imam Al Baaqer a.s"From the riser are two names,one is hidden and the other is revealed. As for the one that is hidden it is Ahmad and the one that is revealed it is Muhammad" Kamal Al Deen p.653 v.2 door 57
  13. The man with three names

    So you compare somebody who claimed to be Imam al-Mahdi pbuh after Imam al-Mahdi pbuh was already born 1000 years ago and claimed his rightful position, with Ahmed pbuh who claims a Divine Text and he is the first person to claim that he is Ahmed pbuh from Prophet's will and Imam Jafar pbuh has said that a false claimant cannot claim a Divine text, is this even logical ? In Prophet's Will it says that the son and successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh is Ahmed, a Mahdi, so if he is a Successor of Imam al-Mahdi pbuh he is also an Imam. How can a Successor of an Imam not be an Imam ? About the Simari narration, who was the 4th deputy in the Minor Occultation: the saying of Sayed Mohammad Al Sadr (ra) in his book Tarikh Ghaibat Al Sughra page 641: He says regarding the religious account of Al Simari: Thus this narration is not sufficient, not even for confirmation of an Islamic legal ruling. And likewise, Al Mirza Al Noori, which Allama Al Majlisi has also conveyed in his book Bihar Al Anwar volume 53 page 318, 43.30 He says: It is one report with a disconnected chain of narrators that is not scientifically obligatory [to follow] and as a result, it does not oppose these events. He is referring to the events that indicate that Imam Al Mahdi has physically met with people [during the occultation], and sent people [as messengers] as he did with Sheikh Al Mufeed, depicting him as the medium between himself and the Shia. “So I said, ‘O Master, indeed Our scholars have narrated some traditions about the Companion of the Matter (PBUH), that he said when he was commanded to enter into the Major Occultation, “whoever claims to have seen me during my Major Occultation is a liar.” In spite of that so many have seen him, even from among you?’ So, he said, ‘You have told the truth, but he (PBUH) said that during that time because there was a large number of enemies from his family as well as from others from the pharaohs (tyrants/oppressors) of Bani Al-Abbas, so much so that the Shia used to prevent one another from speaking about or mentioning the Imam. As for the current time period, a lot of time has passed and the enemy has despaired; our territories are out of their control and we are safe from their oppression and through the blessing of the Imam (PBUH) none of the enemies can reach us.’ Ghaibah Al-Namani, P. 187, Tafsir Al-Ayashy, V. 2, P. 56, Bihar Al-Anwar, V. 52, P. 341, Muajim Ahadith Al-Imam Al-Mahdi, V. 5, P. 2
  14. Who Is Ahmad Al Hassan?

    Sheikh Badr from the Ansar of Imam Al Mahdi pbuh narrates to us some stories with the yamani Ahmed PBUH. He is one of the ansars who met the Imam a.s. many times.He says:‘’ I narrate to you the testimony of one of the representatives of the clerics about Ahmed Al Hassan a.s.The Sayyed pbuh sent me one day to one of the representatives living in Najaf, for the purpose of giving him dawa. His name is Sheikh Mohammed Ameen Suoody. This representative was one of those who knew the Sayyed pbuh. So the Sayyed pbuh sent me to him. After giving him dawa, the Sheikh refused the claim of Ahmed Al Hassan a.s. and did not believe in it.After I finished giving him dawa, I asked him about the manners of the Sayyed pbuh. He said that the students of the hawza used to call Ahmed ‘’ Al Basry’’, the truthful one and the trustee. He also said that when the Sayyed a.s. used to speak, he would only do so by referring to Quranic verses and narration from Al Mohammed pbut. As to those who are bemused as to how this Sheikh did not believe in the Imam a.s. The Sheikh responded to me and to this question saying ‘’ Why wasn’t I the one sent from Imam Al Mahdi a.s. why was it Ahmed Al Basry??!!!. From the strange and unordinary events that took place with this dawa is the following storyOne day I went to give dawa to the Sheikhs that resided inside the Shrine of the Prince pbuh. So I gave dawa to one of them, and I told him that Imam Al Mahdi a.s. has sent his messenger ‘’ Ahmed Al Hassan a.s.’’. when I finished doing so, a man sitting next to the head of the shrine of Aba Torab a.s. He said to me, what is it that which you speak of? So I told him. So he said to me and are you a believer in him? I said to him ‘’ If Allah swt accepts me then Yes.’’ So he was silent.I left the Haydari shrine heading towards Al Toosi street when I saw the same man that I spoke to earlier. I was surprised to this as I left him whilst he was reading duaa. So he called me from a distance and in his hands was a Kafan( cover/ shroud used to cover dead people). And he said to me when you give dawa to anyone about this matter, don’t bring forth all the proofs, but bring forth one proof and expand in it and then give the questioner more. So I said to him, ‘’ And do you have knowledge of this matter?’’ So he said to me I know everything, so I said to him ‘’ What is your name O master’’ he said to me ‘’ My name is Faydullah’’. I said to him ‘’ Who are you o master’’ So he said me ‘’ We are those who carried the shrouds on the shoulders ‘’. So he left and I did not see him again.At that same day, I went back home, and Allah swt gave me success in reading the Calf. When I began with the dedication which is page 11 from the book, ‘’ It said ‘’ To those who carried their shrouds and marched towards Allah swt’’. So I remembered the saying of that holy man. After a period of time, I had the honour of meeting the Sayyed pbuh and told him of everything that took place with me. He simply said to me ‘’ Inshallah Kheir’’. And from the strange stories is Imam Al Mahdi a.s. telling someone of the holy call of the Sayyed pbuh before decades. One day, a few ansars went to visit Imam Al Hussein a.s. by foot. They would not rest except by an Istikhara. And the Istikhara was good on one of the houses that was on the way. The owner of the house welcomed the Ansar. He was an old man. After he showed his hospitality to the Ansar, they went on to bring him the news of the messenger of the Imam a.s. So the man answered them ‘’ His name is Ahmed Al Hassan and he is from Basra. ? So they said to him ‘’ Yes’’. He said to them, ‘’ I know since 40 years. So they Ansars were very curious and sought to find out how when they visited this man again later on. I was amongst Sheikhs and Sayyeds from the Ansars which included Sayed Hassan Al Hamami, Sheikh Hazim Al Haqani, Sayyed Talib Al Safi, Sheikh Mohammed Al Hereshawi, and Sheikh Humood Al Kinani and Sheikh Hasan Al Kinani. The man welcomed us again. We told him to tell us about his amazing story. He delayed it until his relatives came by as they themselves were witnesses to this. So he said‘’ When I was young, I used to serve the visitors of Imam Al Hussein a.s. There was a man who used to help me and he became my friend. One day, the man called me by my mother’s name but not the same name that I knew of her. So I asked my mother about this name so she said to me ‘’ Yes, this is my real name, but my parents changed it years later. And only a few people know of this matter’’. Afterwards, I met the same man, and I asked him about his name. He told me ‘’ My name is like your name. I am called Mahdi, and they call me Abu Salih, so call me as they call you. So he started to narrate to me some stories filled with miracles. One day, he invited me to go and visit Imam Al Hussein a.s. by foot. I took permission from my father, and he granted me that. The man and I left before Maghrib Athan and arrived right at the Athan. I did not realise it on the way, but I saw that the earth was folded for us.I was very curious and wanted to know who this man was. I aksed him again ‘’ Who are you O master’’?. He said to me ‘’ I will tell you, but if you tell anyone of this, then you will not see me again except in the kingdom of heavens. I agreed. He said to me ‘’ I am Imam Al Mahdi son of Al Hassan Al Askary a.s. So I cried and went down to kiss his hands and asked him about his time of appearance. He replied saying ‘’ Allah swt will send you a messenger from me. His name is Ahmed and he is from Basra. I said to him ‘’ O master there are many in Basra with that name’’. he said ‘’ He is called Ahmed Al Hassan pbuh and he said to me, do not turn back from giving him victory. He will have immigration, so follow him even if you have to crawl on the ground. And from my happiness, I went to my family and told them of the news because I could not bear the weight of what he told me. I also told my relatives, so they ripped my clothes to take blessing from me and kissed my eye. And after the man finished from talking, he told the relatives present in the gathering to bear witness and so they did.So the man believed immediately in the Imam a.s. His sons contributed to changing the path that leads to the shrine.
  15. Sayed al-Sadr's approach about the Yamani

    Wa Aleikom salam, The great Shia scholar Sheikh AlMajlesy r.a. said the following: He said that because Imaan(faith)started from Mecca which is Tuhama from the region of Yemen and so it was called: The Yamani Kaaba Mustadrak Safeenat AlBihar Sheikh Ali AlNumazi v.10 p.602 and Bihar AlAnwar v.22 p.1 So we have the words of great Schia scholars like Sheikh Al-Majlesy r.a. and Sayed al-Sadr r.a. and also Sheikh Sagheer.
×