Jump to content

Ebn Tie me yeah

Advanced Members
  • Content count

    363
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ebn Tie me yeah

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    Tawhid Kingdom

Previous Fields

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

1,237 profile views
  1. Eeeeeeyo, salam wahabi-dude. You're king died recently. I feel so bad for you :( :P

  2. Attempts Of Refutation The Book About Ibn Saba

    That may be accurately in the political sense. As far as the Hanafi fiqh is concerned it is far removed from the teachings of Aale Muhammad. But then again, the disciples of Abu Hanifa over-ruled the opinions of their teacher. Abu Yusuf became a satrap of the Abbasids, the Hanafi school then transformed itself to a sort of government rubber stamp. Kufa is not always 100% Shii'. There are the rich loyalist who would go to any extent in following the Ummayad caliphs and the Abbasids. Abu Hanifa is famous for being silent on Yazeed ibn Mawiya, that must explain many things. The only sincere Sunni school is that of the Madinan Imam Malik, for whom i have special regard. Imam Malik has been sincere to the teachings of Islam and stood up for Ahlul Bayt.
  3. Attempts Of Refutation The Book About Ibn Saba

    I do not agree with that. I am sure you are aware regarding the revolt by Imam Zayd ibn Ali (AS) against Banu Ummaya. Whatever Umar bin Abdul Aziz (RA) did was reversed by his successors including the disputed Fadak hamlet. I believe it is accurate to say that only during the time of Imam Hanbal that Ameer ul Mumineen (AS) was some-what rehabilitated as the new fourth "righteous caliph". Sunnism crystallized much later. I agree with you that Imamis tend to over-emphasize the "blame game" on Abu Bakr and Umar. I am doubtful whether the Sheikhyn really did what was reported in the narrations. My understanding is that the Ummayads introduced many innovations into Islam such as saying "Ameen" loudly, Qabd, etc. They tried to legitimize their claim by pointing fingers to Umar ibn Al-Khattab, They soon raised the two as super-heros of Islam purely to dismiss the claim made by the Alids. At the end of the day, if you remove that three individuals there will be nothing left of Islam (ie Sunnism)
  4. Attempts Of Refutation The Book About Ibn Saba

    @Panzerwafee Good reply i do agree with you. But you must see this way, there are thousands of narrations from Tabeen and Sahaba coming from massive collection ahadith of the Sunnis. I do not dispute that. However those thousands of narrations do not have any impact on the so-called Sunni sect. The Giant Sunni sect rests on four pillars namely Abu Huraira, Ayesha, Anas, Ibn Umar and you can consider Ibn Abbas bearing some impact (due to Abbasid influence). Abu Huraira, Anas bin Malik were solely promoted by the Banu Ummaya since day one due to their allegiance to that faction. Narrations from Ayesha were implanted by the Zubairi faction represented by Shihab Al-Zuhri. Ibn Umar is probably the only slightly neutral source although he is known to be loyal to Banu Ummaya. In a nutshell you can safely say that Sunnism is product of the joint venture between the Ummayad and Zubayri factions and one thing common to them is definitely Nasb. We all know that so-called four pillars were not really Sahabi in the truest sense. They were merely juvenile companions (if you may consider that), teenagers that were in the company of the Holy Prophet (SAWA) more than their own age.
  5. Attempts Of Refutation The Book About Ibn Saba

    So that explains why they call someone Ameer and do taraddi for that person who beheaded a close companion of the 1st Imam. Those individuals only came in because of the phrase "tabeen" and "Sahaba" were used. Ask any Sunni who would recognise lets say Amir bin Hamiq (RA), a great Badri companion. This whole thing about companion based Islam is the invention of Banu Ummaya, projecting their version of how Islam should have been to the past and then somehow trying to connect it with the present.
  6. Umar Burnt Narrations At His Time (Authentic)

    Mr Nader Zaweri has barely challenged the Nawasib on their Nasibi Forum with all that Rijali knowledge.
  7. Are Deobandis And Salafis Very Similar?

    They are not the same but they do share many similar traits. They did insult our great Ibn Taimiyya :P Ahmad Raza Khan aka AlaHazrat is known to lump up them as wahabis and their founding fathers were some-what favourable to Sheikh Al Islam Syedna Ameer Ibn Abdul Wahhab (ra). read Husam Al-Haramayn, you will be amused :D
  8. Refuting Minhaj As-Sunnah (Vol.1) Download Pdf

    Personally i believe the biggest fatal error in their school is to include Ameer ul Mumineen (as) the forth rightly guided caliph. Ibn Hanbal wanted to buy time in order to keep his school afloat for atleast 1000 years or so
  9. New Qibla For Shia

    An emotional statement nothing more!
  10. Order Of The Qur'an

    Allama Tabatabai himself admitted that about the defects in the arrangement of the Quran. He did not delve much into the question I have raised. There are other Shii Mufasireen who actually raised important points: The fact is that the verse on completion has nothing to do with the prohibition on food, so how can it be placed in the centre? The other Shia mufasireen said that a Furo' cannot complete the religion.
  11. Order Of The Qur'an

    Al-Haidary has said many things, he even said Al-Kulayni compiled a book of fatawa ie Al-Kafi. Just because you find buyoot and followed by Bayt, it does not justify the fact that both of the parts of the verse were NOT revealed together. Infact if you understand Arabic, the purification part seems misplaced. It was certainly placed with some other agenda. If you doubt me, look at Surah 5:3 Prohibited to you are dead animals, blood, the flesh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah , and [those animals] killed by strangling or by a violent blow or by a head-long fall or by the goring of horns, and those from which a wild animal has eaten, except what you [are able to] slaughter [before its death], and those which are sacrificed on stone altars, and [prohibited is] that you seek decision through divining arrows. That is grave disobedience. This day those who disbelieve have despaired of [defeating] your religion; so fear them not, but fear Me. This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion. But whoever is forced by severe hunger with no inclination to sin - then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. I have not dissected the verse and removed this part shown below, now read it without it This day those who disbelieve have despaired of [defeating] your religion; so fear them not, but fear Me. This day I have perfected for you your religion and completed My favor upon you and have approved for you Islam as religion. Prohibited to you are dead animals, blood, the flesh of swine, and that which has been dedicated to other than Allah , and [those animals] killed by strangling or by a violent blow or by a head-long fall or by the goring of horns, and those from which a wild animal has eaten, except what you [are able to] slaughter [before its death], and those which are sacrificed on stone altars, and [prohibited is] that you seek decision through divining arrows. That is grave disobedience. But whoever is forced by severe hunger with no inclination to sin - then indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful. This will be sufficient for those with intellect!
  12. Imam Hasan

    Asalamualaikum, Imam Hassan Al-Mujtaba (as) was already martyred, his burial was done by his brother Imam Hussayn (as) in Jannat Al-Baqi
  13. Reasons Which Stop Me From Becoming A Shia

    Waris, Asalamualaikum, Brother, apparently people have bombarded you with information. Our religion does not depend on attacking the personalities whom you adore. As a Sufi I can appreciate your mindset. We have a huge corpus of supplication which you may want to look at. There is a particular reason why I am asking you to do so, we have the largest collection of supplication within Islam, no other school comes even close to us which includes the Sufis. We have a huge spiritual reserve. The book you may want to look into is called Mafatih Al-Jinan. Read the supplication and in particular Dua Kumayl. After reading the dua you will realise who was the real spiritual successor of the Prophet (sawa) and then ask yourself did your Imams (Abu Bakr & Umar) leave behind any supplication that can benefit you in the hereafter? As for the questions you asked, do you believe the Ahlul Bayt has been oppressed?
  14. Did Yazeed Order Imam Hussain (As) To Be Killed?

    The most inappropriate of things to be brought up in a Shii forum. There is no doubt Yazeed (LA) murdered Imam Hussayn (as). He (عليه السلام) said, ‘Three are the worst of creations, which afflicted the best of the creations,1. Abū Sufyān, he fought the Messenger of Allāh and hated him (صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم)2. Mu`āwiyah, he fought `Alī (عليه السلام) and hated him (عليه السلام)3. Yazīd b. Mu`āwiyah, may Allāh curse him, he fought al-Ḥusayn b. `Alī (عليه السلام) and hated him until he killed him (عليه السلام)This is taken from Al-Kafi Volume 8. Graded as Hasan, you see Nader Zaweri's page
  15. Revisitingthesalaf Refuted!

    So according to your sect, Ameer ul Mumineen (as) was power hungry and even if the Prophet (sawa) denied Ameer ul Mumineen (as), he would still try and only the "people" will stop it. What do you think of Imam Ali (as)? These "people" were only interested to deny the right to Ahlul Bayt but was silent when the Prophet's son Imam Hussayn (as) was murdered. Where was these people? Your Bukhari is a nasibi!
×