An off topic, but relevant information:
If you're looking for the discussions on the tahrif of al-Qur'an, bro Dar'ul has splitted this topic so you can find it in the Quran, Hadeeth & Du'a section, with the title of Tahreef & Qira'aat
Were The Classical Scholars Muqassirs?
Started by
Haydar Husayn
, Jun 12 2012 09:20 AM
277 replies to this topic
#277
Posted 24 June 2012 - 08:21 AM
Kaniz e Zahra, on 23 June 2012 - 03:10 PM, said:
With all due respect to ay.khoei,Allah's view is more authentic than any fallible human being,even if they are scholars but His promise can't be violated.
The Meaning of Tahrif
The Meaning of Tahrif (interpolation or tampering)
This word is used with common denotations, some of which are acceptably applicable to the Qur’an; and the others are either inapplicable or disputed. The details are as below.
(...)
The third meaning of Tahrif is an omission or an addition of a word or two, at the same time leaving the essence of the Qur’an untouched.
It is the type of interpolation which surely occurred in the first century of Islam, and in the days of the companions of the Prophet (‘s). The fact that Uthman burnt up all other copies of the Qur’an, and ordered his emissaries to do away with all the copies other than the codex prepared by himself, is an ample proof that there existed some difference between his copy and the others, else he would not have asked for their destruction.
In fact, some of the scholars have recorded those differences, like Abdullah b. Abi Dawud as‑Sajistani who wrote a book titled: Kitabul Masahif. It could be inferred that some interpolation had occurred, either on the part of Uthman or on the part of the scribes who prepared their copies. But we will soon establish that the copy of Uthman was actually the one already known to the Muslims. It was the one which was handed over from the Prophet (‘s) and widely used. The Tahrif by way of addition or omission had occurred in those copies which ceased to exist after the era of Uthman. As for the existing Qur’an, it is totally free from any omission or addition.
In short, those who rightly believe that those extra codices of the Qur’an were not authenticated by tawattur,that is to say that their authenticity was not established by wide currency and acceptance among Muslims, for them it is also right to believe that this sort of tampering had occurred in the beginning, but it ceased to exist after the time of Uthman. This leads us to believe that only that Qur’an remained authentic which was supported by a continuous chain joined with the Prophet (‘s).
Notes:
[2]al-Wafi, p.274
http://www.al-islam.org/tahrif_quran/
#278
Posted 24 June 2012 - 09:47 AM
LoveforTruth, on 24 June 2012 - 08:21 AM, said:
The Meaning of Tahrif
This word is used with common denotations, some of which are acceptably applicable to the Qur’an; and the others are either inapplicable or disputed. The details are as below.
(...)
The third meaning of Tahrif is an omission or an addition of a word or two, at the same time leaving the essence of the Qur’an untouched.
It is the type of interpolation which surely occurred in the first century of Islam, and in the days of the companions of the Prophet (‘s). The fact that Uthman burnt up all other copies of the Qur’an, and ordered his emissaries to do away with all the copies other than the codex prepared by himself, is an ample proof that there existed some difference between his copy and the others, else he would not have asked for their destruction.
In fact, some of the scholars have recorded those differences, like Abdullah b. Abi Dawud as‑Sajistani who wrote a book titled: Kitabul Masahif. It could be inferred that some interpolation had occurred, either on the part of Uthman or on the part of the scribes who prepared their copies. But we will soon establish that the copy of Uthman was actually the one already known to the Muslims. It was the one which was handed over from the Prophet (‘s) and widely used. The Tahrif by way of addition or omission had occurred in those copies which ceased to exist after the era of Uthman. As for the existing Qur’an, it is totally free from any omission or addition.
In short, those who rightly believe that those extra codices of the Qur’an were not authenticated by tawattur,that is to say that their authenticity was not established by wide currency and acceptance among Muslims, for them it is also right to believe that this sort of tampering had occurred in the beginning, but it ceased to exist after the time of Uthman. This leads us to believe that only that Qur’an remained authentic which was supported by a continuous chain joined with the Prophet (‘s).
Notes:
[2]al-Wafi, p.274
http://www.al-islam.org/tahrif_quran/
The Meaning of Tahrif (interpolation or tampering)
This word is used with common denotations, some of which are acceptably applicable to the Qur’an; and the others are either inapplicable or disputed. The details are as below.
(...)
The third meaning of Tahrif is an omission or an addition of a word or two, at the same time leaving the essence of the Qur’an untouched.
It is the type of interpolation which surely occurred in the first century of Islam, and in the days of the companions of the Prophet (‘s). The fact that Uthman burnt up all other copies of the Qur’an, and ordered his emissaries to do away with all the copies other than the codex prepared by himself, is an ample proof that there existed some difference between his copy and the others, else he would not have asked for their destruction.
In fact, some of the scholars have recorded those differences, like Abdullah b. Abi Dawud as‑Sajistani who wrote a book titled: Kitabul Masahif. It could be inferred that some interpolation had occurred, either on the part of Uthman or on the part of the scribes who prepared their copies. But we will soon establish that the copy of Uthman was actually the one already known to the Muslims. It was the one which was handed over from the Prophet (‘s) and widely used. The Tahrif by way of addition or omission had occurred in those copies which ceased to exist after the era of Uthman. As for the existing Qur’an, it is totally free from any omission or addition.
In short, those who rightly believe that those extra codices of the Qur’an were not authenticated by tawattur,that is to say that their authenticity was not established by wide currency and acceptance among Muslims, for them it is also right to believe that this sort of tampering had occurred in the beginning, but it ceased to exist after the time of Uthman. This leads us to believe that only that Qur’an remained authentic which was supported by a continuous chain joined with the Prophet (‘s).
Notes:
[2]al-Wafi, p.274
http://www.al-islam.org/tahrif_quran/
Edited by Kaniz e Zahra, 24 June 2012 - 09:49 AM.
"By Allah! You will never be able to eradicate our memory!"
-Lady Zainab (as)

Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














