Jump to content


- -

Difference Between Morality And Ethics


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 -Enlightened

-Enlightened

    Alif Lam Meem❤

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,303 posts
  • Religion:Monotheism
  • Interests:Reading the book of guidance and thinking

Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:00 PM

(salam)

I got inspired by this Yahoo Answer topic in the link
http://answers.yahoo...02214329AAlWxaW

it's important to distinguish between the 2 concepts 'morality and ethics'

Morality is when you do an action because you must do it .

whereas in Ethics , you do an action because you want to aim higher.

a secular example :

In ethics, you do not commit plagiarism because it's not fair and you understand the value of justice but in morality, you do not commit plagiarism because you're fearing the consequences (expulsion from school).

Big question :

Who is more likely to be ethical ? Believers or non-believers (atheist) ? why?


بَقِيَّتُ ٱللَّهِ خَيْرٌۭ لَّكُمْ إِن كُنتُم مُّؤْمِنِينَ

What remains with Allah (Baqiyatullah) is better for you if you are believers.. (Hud : 86)

וכמסתר פנים ממנו

Isaiah 53:3


Ya Aba Saleh Al-Mahdi


#2 BaqiyatullahY

BaqiyatullahY

    Remainder of Allah

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPip
  • 467 posts
  • Location:21°09′ S 55°30′ E
  • Religion:Islam

Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:32 PM

(salam)
Moral: comes from outside, like religion. You won't do plagiarism because islam forbids it
Ethic: comes from your inside. It depends on your self control.

Who is more likely to be ethical ? BOTH !

As i said, ethic is something interior to each person. Let me take an example. Since a few years, lawyers have too much difficulties to decide whether it should be allowed to clone a human or not. Why ? because our law is not based on religion, or any values coming from outside, but what people think. We all have a different perception. Some peoples would be agree with human cloning, some against. It's an ethical debate, not a moral one, as they don't use religion as a reference.

So let me ask you, are you for (acitve/passive) euthanasia? You can say, yes, another muslim will say no, an antheist could say both.. Well it depends on every person.
Ethical it's your faculty to decide whether you'll do it or not. So anybody can decide himself if he is for/against an idea..

The appropriate question should be, who is more likely to be moral ?

ps: c'mon, une question philosophique a 21h31, et en anglais lol ... (si je fais des fautes en anglais, n'hésites pas a me corriger).

Posted Image


  بَقِيَّتُ ٱللَّهِ خَيْرٌۭ لَّكُمْ إِن كُنتُم مُّؤْمِنِينَ ۚ وَمَآ أَنَا۠ عَلَيْكُم بِحَفِيظٍۢ


"What remains with Allah is better for you if you are believers, and I am not a keeper over you"

[Hud 11:86]


#3 Chaotic Muslem

Chaotic Muslem

    empty soul

  • Unregistered
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,505 posts

Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:34 PM

morality Posted Image late 14c., "moral qualities," from O.Fr. moralité, from L.L. moralitatem (nom. moralitas) "manner, character," from L. moralis (see moral (adj.)). Meaning "goodness" is attested from 1590s.

Where there is no free agency, there can be no morality. Where there is no temptation, there can be little claim to virtue. Where the routine is rigorously proscribed by law, the law, and not the man, must have the credit of the conduct. [William H. Prescott, "History of the Conquest of Peru," 1847]

morale Posted Image 1752, "moral principles or practice," from Fr. morale "morality, good conduct," from fem. of O.Fr. moral "moral" (see moral (adj.)). Meaning "confidence" (especially of military) first recorded 1831, from confusion with Fr. moral (French distinguishes le moral "temperament" and la morale "morality"). moral (adj.) Posted Image mid-14c., "pertaining to character or temperament" (good or bad), from O.Fr. moral, from L. moralis "proper behavior of a person in society," lit. "pertaining to manners," coined by Cicero ("De Fato," II.i) to translate Gk. ethikos (see ethics) from L. mos (gen. moris) "one's disposition," in plural, "mores, customs, manners, morals," of uncertain origin. Meaning "morally good, conforming to moral rules," is first recorded late 14c. of stories, 1630s of persons. Original value-neutral sense preserved in moral support, moral victory, with sense of "pertaining to character as opposed to physical action." The noun meaning "moral exposition of a story" is attested from c.1500. Related: Morally --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- islamically , the one who fear the Lord is more praised than the one who not fear Him , and teh oen who follow the rules of his creator is better than the one who works by his own passion-hawa- ethics Posted Image "the science of morals," c.1600, plural of M.E. ethik "study of morals" (see ethic). The word also traces to Ta Ethika, title of Aristotle's work.
ethic (n.) Posted Image late 14c., ethik "study of morals," from O.Fr. etique (13c.), from L.L. ethica, from Gk. ethike philosophia "moral philosophy," fem. of ethikos "ethical," from ethos "moral character," related to ethos "custom" (see ethos). Meaning "a person's moral principles" is attested from 1650s. ethos Posted Image revived by Palgrave in 1851 from Gk. ethos "moral character, nature, disposition, habit, custom," from suffixed form of PIE root *s(w)e- (see idiom). An important concept in Aristotle (e.g. "Rhetoric" II xii-xiv)
idiom Posted Image 1580s, "form of speech peculiar to a people or place," from M.Fr. idiome (16c.) and directly from L.L. idioma "a peculiarity in language," from Gk. idioma "peculiarity, peculiar phraseology," from idioumai "to appropriate to oneself," from idios "personal, private," properly “particular to oneself,” from PIE *swed-yo-, suffixed form of root *s(w)e-, pronoun of the third person and reflexive (referring back to the subject of a sentence), also used in forms denoting the speaker's social group, "(we our-)selves" (cf. Skt. svah, Avestan hva-, O.Pers. huva "one's own," khva-data "lord," lit. "created from oneself;" Gk. hos "he, she, it;" L. suescere "to accustom, get accustomed," sodalis "companion;" O.C.S. svoji "his, her, its," svojaku "relative, kinsman;" Goth. swes "one's own;" O.N. sik "oneself;" Ger. Sein; O.Ir. fein "self, himself"). Meaning "phrase or expression peculiar to a language" is from 1620s.


Posted Image


#4 -Enlightened

-Enlightened

    Alif Lam Meem❤

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,303 posts
  • Religion:Monotheism
  • Interests:Reading the book of guidance and thinking

Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:56 PM

View Postcendrillon, on 14 May 2012 - 12:32 PM, said:


ps: c'mon, une question philosophique a 21h31, et en anglais lol ... (si je fais des fautes en anglais, n'hésites pas a me corriger).

:lol:

بَقِيَّتُ ٱللَّهِ خَيْرٌۭ لَّكُمْ إِن كُنتُم مُّؤْمِنِينَ

What remains with Allah (Baqiyatullah) is better for you if you are believers.. (Hud : 86)

וכמסתר פנים ממנו

Isaiah 53:3


Ya Aba Saleh Al-Mahdi


#5 Ahmed Ismael

Ahmed Ismael

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPip
  • 276 posts

Posted 15 May 2012 - 11:24 AM

View Post-Enlightened, on 14 May 2012 - 12:00 PM, said:

(salam)

I got inspired by this Yahoo Answer topic in the link
http://answers.yahoo...02214329AAlWxaW

it's important to distinguish between the 2 concepts 'morality and ethics'

Morality is when you do an action because you must do it .

whereas in Ethics , you do an action because you want to aim higher.

a secular example :

In ethics, you do not commit plagiarism because it's not fair and you understand the value of justice but in morality, you do not commit plagiarism because you're fearing the consequences (expulsion from school).


Big question :

Who is more likely to be ethical ? Believers or non-believers (atheist) ? why?


Morality is an effort to be 'muttaki.' Ethics of course as we all know is an interpretation from the United States of America, the citadel of disbelieve.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users