Professor Higgins, on 13 March 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:
Saddam did not slaughter Shias for who they were, he did not attack their beliefs and places of worship, he did not send death squads to massacre them. Stop exaggerating and quoting from cliched Western academics who don't know jack about Iraq.
For all you know, many of the people who were involved in the "atrocities" of 1991 are still working in the Iraqi Gov't. Just last year Barzani pardoned 5,000 former Kurdish collaborators (Jash), who had taken part in the Operation Anfal, and reinstated them in the Peshmergas.
You were irritating me with images of Saddam's capture and posting them on these forums, so I responded in kind.
Cliched Western academics? I don't read their accounts of Iraq. Most of the academic reading I did in uni was about Palestinians. Western leftists would rather write about Fellujah over Kerbala or Nasriyah, which I find rather unfortunate. You see, you aren't some great resistor, you are in line with the likes of liberal hippies.. critical distinction being that they do it out of ignorance and you do it out of racism/sectarianism. I mean what does a Tikrit have to do to get the title of sectarian? Something beyond disallowing them from practicing many of their Shia beliefs, leaving them out of power, and then bombing their places of worship and the shrine of our holy imam when they rebelled?
My accounts come from my family members who had death warrants issued against them after the 91 revolution. I knew these stories before I knew about Cinderella and her tacky footwear.
Trust me, I know there are traitors in the current government. What did you want us to do? Disenfranchise all opposition? Take out their eyes and torture them? Clearly that type of stuff wins your respect.
As for the picture, I posted that on the forum for everyone to see. Why did you private message it? I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt and pretend you were suddenly aware of the disgusting nature of your loyalties.
Professor Higgins, on 15 March 2012 - 01:45 PM, said:
This is the problem. Why should Iraq be ruled by Shia or Sunni or Kurd ? Why can't Iraq be ruled by Iraqis ? There is no difference between Sunni or Shia, so why keep saying Shia rule ? When the Baath Party ruled, did they say this is Sunni Rule ? Did they force you to abandon your religious practices ? Then why this hatred ?
By your logic, Saddam's rule was Shia rule ( actually it was).
You are such a disingenuous clown.
HUSSEIN24, on 15 March 2012 - 06:22 PM, said:
May Allah forgive that boy who was misguided by the invasion of the shaitan kafirs,.
chahrazade, on 16 March 2012 - 04:10 PM, said:
Alejandro Sosa, on 17 March 2012 - 06:17 PM, said:
Depressing..this is the erosion of Iraqi culture
Edited by Zahratul_Islam, 17 March 2012 - 09:24 PM.