"emo" Kids Slaughtered By Militants
#1
Posted 11 March 2012 - 03:51 PM
Militants in Shi'ite neighborhoods where the stonings have taken place circulated lists on Saturday naming more youths targeted to be killed if they do not change the way they dress.
The killings have taken place since Iraq's interior ministry drew attention to the "emo" subculture last month, labeling it "Satanism" and ordering a community police force to stamp it out.
http://www.reuters.c...E8290CY20120310
#3
Posted 11 March 2012 - 04:26 PM
Dozens of Iraqi teenagers have been killed in recent months by militias who consider them to be devil worshippers, human rights activists claim.
The young people are described as "emos", a term used in the West to refer to youths who listen to rock music and wear alternative clothing.
Reports say that up to 58 teenagers have been beaten to death or shot in the last month, most of them men.
Iraq's interior ministry recently described emos as devil worshippers.
In Iraq, the term emo is also conflated with homosexuality, which although legal is socially and religiously taboo.
'Threatened'
Militias in Baghdad's conservative Shia neighbourhood of Sadr City have distributed leaflets with the names of 20 young people they say should be punished.
In a statement on his website, Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr described emo youths as "crazy and fools", but said they should be dealt with within the law.
"They are a plague on Muslim society, and those responsible should eliminate them through legal means," he said.
Mustafa, a young Iraqi, told the BBC he feels "threatened" when he wears black clothing.
"The Iraqi people look at you in a bad way," he said. "It is even worse when the Iraqi security for example arrest those in black or in the emo groups."
The interior ministry said it had not recorded any anti-gay or anti-emo killings, but said recent murders in Baghdad could be attributed to "revenge, or social, criminal, political or cultural reasons".
The International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, based in New York, told Agence France Presse that nearly 40 people have been kidnapped, tortured or killed in Iraq since February in a "new surge of anti-gay violence".

Iraqi activists said this picture belongs to a teenager who was brutally killed by religious police for having an “emo” hairstyle. Photo: Al Tahreer News
I'd wonder how they'd react if they ever went to parts of Tehran, where this style is actually quite the norm.
More of an Iranian influence than a Western influence by the looks of it.
Edited by Propaganda_of_the_Deed, 11 March 2012 - 04:27 PM.

"If you find yourself alone, riding in the green fields with the sun on your face, do not be troubled.
For you are in Elysium, and you're already dead!"
Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.
~ Charles Patterson
#5 Guest_Zahratul_Islam_*
Posted 11 March 2012 - 07:29 PM
Edited by Zahratul_Islam, 11 March 2012 - 07:30 PM.
#6
Posted 11 March 2012 - 07:34 PM
they shouldn't judge anyone by their physical appearance
بَقِيَّتُ ٱللَّهِ خَيْرٌۭ لَّكُمْ إِن كُنتُم مُّؤْمِنِينَ
What remains with Allah (Baqiyatullah) is better for you if you are believers.. (Hud : 86)
וכמסתר פנים ממנו
Isaiah 53:3
Ya Aba Saleh Al-Mahdi
#8 Guest_Mushu_*
Posted 11 March 2012 - 07:49 PM
There is no evidence that the reports are accurate or truthful. The consensus in Iraq is that the media have inflated these stories in attempt to discredit the government and the religious authorities of Iraq. Sheikh al-Yaqoobi issued a statement that if the stories are indeed true (which he doubts), then of course they are denounced by Islam and have nothing to do with Islam. He said that the media stories are laced with bias, with statements such as 'Shia extremism' and the like.
Furthermore, the most reputable Islamic authorities in Iraq have denounced the actions (Sistani and Yaqoobi). Even Muqtada al-Sadr expressed that though he believes the 'emo' subculture needs to be addressed, and has no place in Iraqi society, he did denounce the actions.
Edited by Mushu, 11 March 2012 - 07:58 PM.
#9
Posted 12 March 2012 - 01:46 AM
And when I observe my hijab, it makes me feel like the most courageous soldier on this Earth. To have the hijab of Zaynab!!! Dear Lord, it gives me power! No one can understand the energy running through my veins."
-Shiasoul
#10
Posted 12 March 2012 - 01:50 AM
Edited by Propaganda_of_the_Deed, 12 March 2012 - 01:53 AM.

"If you find yourself alone, riding in the green fields with the sun on your face, do not be troubled.
For you are in Elysium, and you're already dead!"
Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.
~ Charles Patterson
#12
Posted 12 March 2012 - 03:28 AM
Mushu, on 11 March 2012 - 07:49 PM, said:
Furthermore, the most reputable Islamic authorities in Iraq have denounced the actions (Sistani and Yaqoobi). Even Muqtada al-Sadr expressed that though he believes the 'emo' subculture needs to be addressed, and has no place in Iraqi society, he did denounce the actions.
LOL Muqtada even condemned the sectarian violence, that didn't stop some people claiming allegiance to him from doing it.

ÇáØáíÚÉ ÇáãÞÇÊáÉ
#13
Posted 12 March 2012 - 03:30 AM
Zahratul_Islam, on 11 March 2012 - 07:29 PM, said:
The Interior Ministry is infiltrated by sympathizers of Islamist fundamentalist parties. Militants have always been there in conservative neighborhoods but they were stopped from doing their thing.

ÇáØáíÚÉ ÇáãÞÇÊáÉ
#14 Guest_Zahratul_Islam_*
Posted 13 March 2012 - 01:49 AM
Professor Higgins, on 12 March 2012 - 03:24 AM, said:
I would love to say you stand alone and that i haven't come across other Palestinians/Pan Arabs like yourself, but I would be lying through my damn teeth if i did so.
I support the Palestinian cause because it simply must be one against a brutal oppressor. An oppressor so brutal that Palestinians have shown time and time again they are willing to worship the worst and bloodiest of dictators if he happens to support their cause and agenda, even if in doing so they are paying lip service to dead, tortured, mutilated, gassed, raped Iraqi bodies. Even if by doing so they fail to realize they are the very definition of irony.
Free people do not do this unless they are inherently evil, entirely unmotivated by socioeconomic factors. That is why the Palestinians I know who have been here for a while or are relatively educated tend to denounce Saddam.
Therefore you are either
1) A fob
2) uneducated
3) evil
4) any combination of the above
Your call, buddy.
Edited by Zahratul_Islam, 13 March 2012 - 01:53 AM.
#15
Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:02 AM
Zahratul_Islam, on 13 March 2012 - 01:49 AM, said:
I would love to say you stand alone and that i haven't come across other Palestinians/Pan Arabs like yourself, but I would be lying through my damn teeth if i did so.
I support the Palestinian cause because it simply must be one against a brutal oppressor. An oppressor so brutal that Palestinians have shown time and time again they are willing to worship the worst and bloodiest of dictators if he happens to support their cause and agenda, even if in doing so they are paying lip service to dead, tortured, mutilated, gassed, raped Iraqi bodies. Even if by doing so they fail to realize they are the very definition of irony.
Free people do not do this unless they are inherently evil, entirely unmotivated by socioeconomic factors. That is why the Palestinians I know who have been here for a while or are relatively educated tend to denounce Saddam.
Therefore you are either
1) A fob
2) uneducated
3) evil
4) any combination of the above
Your call, buddy.
#16 Guest_Zahratul_Islam_*
Posted 13 March 2012 - 02:22 AM
Abu Muslim, on 13 March 2012 - 02:02 AM, said:
I appreciate your concern for his feelings. I am not the kind of person who bullies or attacks people, especially if I sense that they are in a position of weakness.
That being said, this user came on shiachat to praise a dictator infamous for his slaughter of Shias, so I am going to go ahead and guess that he wasn't exactly looking for civil discourse and that his cyber pair is made of steel.
Furthermore, this member has private messaged me images of Saddam in his glory years stating that they *would be back*, so I am pretty sure he is going to be fine emotionally.. albeit the mental state of someone who promises to revive a long dead dictator is a little less reassuring.
Edited by Zahratul_Islam, 13 March 2012 - 02:27 AM.
#18 Guest_Mushu_*
Posted 13 March 2012 - 08:25 AM
Propaganda_of_the_Deed, on 12 March 2012 - 01:50 AM, said:
Yeah of course, noone is denying that there are fundamentalists. For instance, some members of Jaysh al-Mahdi will happily kill rival Shia groups, simply because they disagree with Muqtada.
Most Shias in Iraq are reigned by scholarly opinion, non-Taqlidi ideas are not very prevalent in Iraq.
#19
Posted 13 March 2012 - 12:23 PM
But seriously, when I saw emo next to Iraq.
I just died of laughter.
It's the most cheesiest thing I have ever heard or even conceptualized in my brain.
And not to mention, especially when you're self-aware that a place like Iraq has a lot of people that take things by the book or take culture and religion extremely seriously, you have to have enough common sense, not to act/behave in a certain manner that can result in the loss of lives.
#20
Posted 13 March 2012 - 05:01 PM
Zahratul_Islam, on 13 March 2012 - 02:22 AM, said:
That being said, this user came on shiachat to praise a dictator infamous for his slaughter of Shias, so I am going to go ahead and guess that he wasn't exactly looking for civil discourse and that his cyber pair is made of steel.
Furthermore, this member has private messaged me images of Saddam in his glory years stating that they *would be back*, so I am pretty sure he is going to be fine emotionally.. albeit the mental state of someone who promises to revive a long dead dictator is a little less reassuring.
Saddam did not slaughter Shias for who they were, he did not attack their beliefs and places of worship, he did not send death squads to massacre them. Stop exaggerating and quoting from cliched Western academics who don't know jack about Iraq.
For all you know, many of the people who were involved in the "atrocities" of 1991 are still working in the Iraqi Gov't. Just last year Barzani pardoned 5,000 former Kurdish collaborators (Jash), who had taken part in the Operation Anfal, and reinstated them in the Peshmergas.
You were irritating me with images of Saddam's capture and posting them on these forums, so I responded in kind.

ÇáØáíÚÉ ÇáãÞÇÊáÉ
#21 Guest_Mushu_*
Posted 13 March 2012 - 06:19 PM
Professor Higgins, on 13 March 2012 - 05:01 PM, said:
For all you know, many of the people who were involved in the "atrocities" of 1991 are still working in the Iraqi Gov't. Just last year Barzani pardoned 5,000 former Kurdish collaborators (Jash), who had taken part in the Operation Anfal, and reinstated them in the Peshmergas.
You were irritating me with images of Saddam's capture and posting them on these forums, so I responded in kind.
Bro aren't you Indian or something?
#22
Posted 14 March 2012 - 07:18 PM
Mushu, on 13 March 2012 - 06:19 PM, said:
Indian, Palestinian or Dutch, who cares? He and his likes can keep dreaming. Saddam and his days are over and nothing will ''bring it back'', and Maliki, he'll be PM for a quite a time, so get used to Shia rule. Enjoy this picture by the way
Edited by Iraqiah_Shia, 14 March 2012 - 07:19 PM.
...ÈÇÞÑ ÇáÕÏÑ ãäÇ ÓáÇãÇ
#23
Posted 15 March 2012 - 03:39 AM
Iraqiah_Shia, on 14 March 2012 - 07:18 PM, said:

Maliki and his camp are powerless and don't know a damn thing. And since you always bring up "Shia rule", need I remind you that your people (Shia Arabs) have never ruled themselves in history, forget about ruling others. Without generous help and guidance from others (Russia and Iran), "Shia rule" in Iraq or Bahrain or any part of the Arab world is an illusion.

ÇáØáíÚÉ ÇáãÞÇÊáÉ
#24 Guest_Mushu_*
Posted 15 March 2012 - 08:21 AM
Professor Higgins, on 15 March 2012 - 03:39 AM, said:
Umm, Iraq is 70% Shia. Being ruled by anything other than Shia is an illusion.
#25
Posted 15 March 2012 - 01:45 PM
Mushu, on 15 March 2012 - 08:21 AM, said:
This is the problem. Why should Iraq be ruled by Shia or Sunni or Kurd ? Why can't Iraq be ruled by Iraqis ? There is no difference between Sunni or Shia, so why keep saying Shia rule ? When the Baath Party ruled, did they say this is Sunni Rule ? Did they force you to abandon your religious practices ? Then why this hatred ?
By your logic, Saddam's rule was Shia rule ( actually it was).

ÇáØáíÚÉ ÇáãÞÇÊáÉ
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















