92 replies to this topic

[Basra]

Justice4all, on 22 October 2011 - 08:06 PM, said:

^ More spam by yours truly, Basra. I have seen those same images and videos you posted at least 5 times today in others threads.

You posted the same two fake videos you Wahhabi idiots claim are from "Homs" meaning actually shot on from a Turkish soap opera set (with your racist, NATO imperialist controlled Turkish fascist allies), your lying videos and Wahhabi propaganda will be countered.  The admins should ban a Yazeedi(la) liar like you immediately, you are a NATO al-CIA-duh supporter propagandist.

You Wahhabis used similar techniques with your al-Qaeda leader Abdelhakim Belhadj under his owner Amerikkkan/NATO imperialist command in Libya.

Edited by Basra, 22 October 2011 - 08:13 PM.

[Al-Muqawama Al-Islamiya]

Salam Alaykum
Don't you find it hysterical that that Wahabis are burning flags that have the name of God. But those opressed Shia AND Sunnis are not burning any sort of flags especially ones with the name of our Lord.

[UndercoverBrother]

Salam

The Islamic world (not just middle east) needs to go back into a unified Islamic state. Only then can the re appearance of the Mahdi take place. The sooner we as an ummah realize this the better.

[Basra]

UndercoverBrother, on 23 October 2011 - 04:15 PM, said:

Salam

The Islamic world (not just middle east) needs to go back into a unified Islamic state. Only then can the re appearance of the Mahdi take place. The sooner we as an ummah realize this the better.

The Islamic world and especially the Middle East will not be united, as Imam al-Mahdi will reappear to fight the Dajjal (even Sunni sources tell us the Dajjal's followers will be lovers of Uthman ibn Affan) and the Sufyani who will be the leader of the Wahhabis that will more then likely be in the Middle East when Imam al-Mahdi returns.

http://www.answering...i/en/chap10.php

Quote- The Nawasib shall be the actual followers of Dajjal - Sufiyani
...
Now who will be the follower of Dajjal be according to Sunnies themselves? Its answer is that:

إن خرج الدجال تبعه من كان يحب عثمان

"When Dajjal appears, his followers will be the lovers of Uthman"
Mizan al-Eitadal, Volume 2 page 107 Translation No. 3031

Sunni scholar Yaqub Fasawi sought to cast doubts over the authenticity of the chain of narration in this tradition which incensed the grand Sunni Imam Dhahabi who stated:

“That is what al-Fasawi rejected from the hadiths, no one did so before him, and if we follow such scruples we would be rejecting many correct Sunnah just because of wrong illusions”

Not only Dajjal but Sufiyani will also be a staunch Uthmani/Nasibi as recorded by Imam Qurtubi:

يقوم في أهل دمشق فيقول يا أهل دمشق : أنا رجل منكم و أنت خاصتنا جدي معاوية بن أبي سفيان

“He shall address the people of Damishq: ‘O people of Damishq, I am from you and you people are special to us. My grandfather was Muawiyah bin Abi Sufiyan.”
Tazkirah Qurtubi, page 693

Sufiyani being from the filthy progeny of Muawiyah and Dajjal’s followers being the lovers of Uthman it is no surprise that these two entities shall come into conflict with the followers of the Ahlubayt and this continue to be the case until their Imam Sufiyani appears and is defeated by the final Imam from Ahlulbayt .

end quote.

[ali1988]

ahki shias have done allot for palestine in terms of fininciall support and there are many lebbanise shias that have gone and fought against israel and i dont mean when they tried invading lebbonon

imam khamenei always brings up the issue of palestine most shias i no with a good heart care about the issue

watch this heart felt video

[Hussien]

Islamists win in Tunisia.
http://www.bbc.co.uk...africa-15438945

[Wahhabism4All]

Devout Muslims coming into power in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and soon Syria. Allahu'akbar. This is exactly what Khameini wished for!!

[Hussien]

He did not wish for, he said so. In Syria however its a conspiracy and a separate case.

And contrary to  you little puppet salafi terrorists who cant see past their oil funded zeal, he was answering those that tried to sell it as liberal democracy. But I guess your minds functions in far too low of a place to grasp what the Ayatollah said or meant. He is a brilliant theoretician.

[Wahhabism4All]

^ Are you saying Khameini sees the future?

[Hussien]

Do you want to hear me say that Ayatollah Khamenei sees the future?

[Taufiq]

Justice4all, on 25 October 2011 - 02:54 AM, said:

Devout Muslims coming into power in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and soon Syria. Allahu'akbar. This is exactly what Khameini wished for!!

Tunisia's revolution was allowed by the imperialist US administration; only when they saw Ben Ali could no longer hold on as their puppet dictator and the US ordered the Tunisian military chiefs to withdraw all their support from Ben Ali which then is what actually caused Ben Ali to have to flee into exile.  In Libya the NATO imperialist alliance has destroyed what was (before NATO's genocidal aerial terrorism) the most advanced, progressive, and successful country on the whole African continent and turned it over to the terrorist Libyan Islamic Fighting Group of Abdelhakim Belhadj who will implement bloody, horrific false Wahhabi "interpretations" of Sharia (i.e. what the Taliban did in Afghanistan).  Other than that the NTC rebels are sure to sellout Libya soon; and let in the foreign banksters particularly the usurious criminal groups: the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and World Bank who will place Libya in complete debt slavery effectively forever.

In Egypt, nothing has changed Hosni Mubarak was just replaced with another Mubarak in Gen. Tantawi who rules his own US backed military dictatorship in today's Egypt.  Also the Muslim Brotherhood (that evidence reveals was a colonialist British creation against Egyptian nationalism of the Wafd party) today is no "devout" Muslim party, they are complete poodles and sellouts to the West.

The Syrian people stand with their government, and the Zionists seek to impose devilish Najdi Wahhabi views on the proud Syrian people (who are mostly very secular people).  The Syrian terrorist gangs are either al-Qaeda affiliated or others are more poodles that follow the also Wahhabi Muslim Brotherhood.

And finally you didn't even mention Bahrain or the revolution of the oppressed Arabian Shi'ites in eastern Saudi, no surprise there for you: as anyone viewing your profile can easily see.

Edited by Taufiq, 25 October 2011 - 09:30 PM.

[satyaban]

How does this fit in with Ayat  Khameini's hopes?

Turkey becomes the region's role model
Arabic News Digest
Jun 16, 2011
Turkey is a new role model for the region
I'm not sure if Turkey is in a state of gradual and cautious emergence, or if we are just starting to recognise it for what it is, wrote the columnist Abdulrahman al Rashed for the London-based daily. Asharq al Awsat.
What is sure, he went on, is that Turkey is no traditional Middle Eastern state. Following a third win for the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) with a little less than 50 per cent of the vote, the writer suggested that "we are in for four extraordinary years for Turkey under the prime minister, Reccep Tayyip Erdogan, who will leave a lasting mark on the era of Turkish history which began when Kamal Ataturk built the country into a modern state.
"Turkey is different from the Arab model, it can't be likened to an Islamic state such as Iran and it isn't European."
In his victory speech Erdogan addressed the Arab world when he vowed that Turkey would be a role model for the region. The countries of the region have been used to looking up to a leader. In the '50s, it was Gamal Abdel Nasser who inspired military coups and nationalism. Then followed the unsuccessful Baathist model, which was succeeded by the doomed Iranian revolutionary ideology that revived religious radicalism.
"We are now before a Turkish model that is also inciting change, led by a man with ever-growing popularity."
Arab world must speak up about Syria
The UAE has taken an explicit decision to stand by the Libyan people in their plight and in their uprising to get rid of the Qaddafi regime, wrote the columnist Mohammed al Hammadi in an opinion article for the Emirati daily Al Ittihad.
Despite the support and recognition offered by the UAE and some other states to the Revolutionary Transitional Council, a number of Arab states have, for unknown reasons, not yet decided on a position towards the Libyan crisis.
The Syrian people are going through one of the worst crises in their recent history as protests rage on in most cities against the government's security clampdown.
"Syria isn't waiting for help from the US or the EU and not even from neighbouring Turkey. Syria is only waiting for the Arabs to show support and save it from a grinding battle between the people and the regime. What are the Arabs waiting for to make a move?"
The Arab silence towards the government's heavy-handed response is no longer tolerable. An explicit Arab position must be declared, for any further delay in this matter would be harmful.
"It isn't in the Arabs' interest that non-Arabs interfere in this conflict. The door to reforms and dialogue will not remain forever open. An Arab intervention to save the internal Syrian situation is of the essence."
A Lebanese cabinet to rescue Syria
The newly formed Lebanese cabinet has been described as the strangest in the country's history as it broke with the custom of dividing ministerial posts among Maronites, Sunnis and Shiites, commented Daoud al Sharyan, a columnist with the pan-Arab newspaper Al Hayat.
The accelerated efforts to form the long-awaited cabinet have been attributed to a Shiite readiness to sacrifice their entitlement to a sixth minister in order to resolve the Sunni representation dilemma. But most probably the sudden formation came as a response to the crisis in Syria.
This isn't a probability based on President Bashir al Assad's swift congratulatory calls, nor is it based on the fact that Prime Minister Najib Miqati repeated Hizbollah slogans of resistance and focused on the special international tribunal for Lebanon.
"The acceleration in the formation of the Lebanese cabinet came upon a Syrian directive as a governmental vacuum in Lebanon would reflect negatively on its support for Damascus."
A further delay would have led to a political situation compounding Syria's internal confusion and allowing for some Lebanese powers to side with the uprising. Since Syria has opted for a military solution to the revolt, a political solution in Lebanon was essential to form a confrontation-ready government in Beirut, in case circumstances call for confrontation.
The dilemma of the Palestinian cabinet
News of ongoing communications between Fatah and Hamas regarding the formation of a Palestinian cabinet are overshadowing other news, declared the pan-Arab Al Quds al Arabi daily in its editorial.
Of major importance is Israeli settlement-building in occupied territories as the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Mr Netanyahu, make his rounds in Europe to hamper Palestinian efforts to extract international support for an independent state.
Palestinian sources are reporting a scheduled meeting between Kahled Mishaal, Hamas' representative, and President Mahmoud Abbas next week in Cairo to try to reach an agreement on the cabinet.
Fatah insists that Dr Salam Fayyad remain in his position as prime minister, while Hamas demands that Jamal al Khodari be designated for the post.
The problem lies in the fact that western and Arab donor countries tend to support Mr Fayyad who enjoys great credibility with them. Thus it is understandable that President Abbas does not want to upset those donors by designating a prime minister they don't welcome.
His fear is that the donations would stop and Mr Fayyad would become a third power who would retain western support.
* Digest compiled by Racha Makarem
rmakarem@thenational.ae

[south-lebanon]

satyaban, on 29 October 2011 - 07:19 PM, said:

How does this fit in with Ayat  Khameini's hopes?

Turkey becomes the region's role model
Arabic News Digest
Jun 16, 2011
Turkey is a new role model for the region
I'm not sure if Turkey is in a state of gradual and cautious emergence, or if we are just starting to recognise it for what it is, wrote the columnist Abdulrahman al Rashed for the London-based daily. Asharq al Awsat.

This is where i spare my self and stop the reading.

in case you missed the link i posted in the other thread,



Is this the human rights role models this article is refering to, or do you pick and choose who is oppressed and who is not according to rupert murdoch media prefrences.

[satyaban]

south-lebanon, on 29 October 2011 - 08:48 PM, said:

This is where i spare my self and stop the reading.

in case you missed the link i posted in the other thread,



Is this the human rights role models this article is refering to, or do you pick and choose who is oppressed and who is not according to rupert murdoch media prefrences.

You have already played that card. If you are afraid of that article just ignore it instead of your feeble response. but I am sure you read it

[Lanatin]

Quote

doomed Iranian revolutionary ideology that revived religious radicalism.

Doomed? Lol, that made my day.

[south-lebanon]

La, on 29 October 2011 - 09:08 PM, said:

Doomed? Lol, that made my day.

i have never in my life read any worse or more politically inaccurate articles than what i read on the alsharq alawsat newspaper, the absolute garbage i read never ceases to amaze me its as if they live in a dream world, the columnist Abdulrahman al Rashed is dreamer but there is actually ones even worse than him like Tariq Al Omayad, he is an outright liar, he is such a shia hater and a wahabi lover

[south-lebanon]

satyaban, on 29 October 2011 - 09:04 PM, said:

You have already played that card. If you are afraid of that article just ignore it instead of your feeble response. but I am sure you read it

well your still beating the Turkish drums and you havn't explained to me why it is not hypocritical to assume that Turkey is intervening in Syria for the sake of human rights while they seem to have their own human rights and human  ethic issues in dealing with Kurdish demands.

[alimohamad40]

bashar al asad in recent interview said bout the protests " this is  a war between islamization and arab nationalism"

Does that mean Imam khamenie is supporting the izlamization or the arab racism thing ?

I think khamenie is trying to save the resistance by any cost but its proving too costly
from experience all the countries have helped the zionist entity embargo the resistance except syria  so they dont want to see a system which will sign a surrender treaty but they can not turn a blind eye to the crimes of the bath system and they can not deny that its an anti islamic system

Edited by alimohamad40, 30 October 2011 - 02:30 PM.

[Haidar Saafi]

satyaban, on 29 October 2011 - 07:19 PM, said:

How does this fit in with Ayat  Khameini's hopes?

Turkey becomes the region's role model

Oh this is rich, you guys promoting Turkey!!! I guess if you want Turkey to be the model: racism, genocide denial, and fascist laws are just great with you.  Turkey is such a "model" lol with Turkey's rabid racism towards Kurds including legally forbidding them from using their language in Turkey, along with massacring them and invading northern Iraq to go after them.  Turkey having clear as day fascist laws on the books that banned "insulting Turkishness" whatever in the world that meant lol, Turkey's history of military dictatorships and military coup d'etats and oh yeah Turkey's GENOCIDE DENIAL (remember that whole thing with the Armenians that the Turks still vehemently and tirelessly deny till this day).  The only people who seem to match Turkey in genocide denial are some right wingers in America that still try to deny the genocide of indigenous Native Americans.

I assume you posted this attempt at praising Turkey mostly because you like that they are secular (putting aside that the AKP is more religious somewhat), but Turkey did ban the Hijab in universities for example among other clear, gross, assaults on Islam and Islamic dress (following the filthy policies of that alcoholic sinner and open atheist kaafir that was called Mustafa Kemal "Ataturk").  But what really makes me laugh is from reading your other posts you voice support for the NTC rebels in Libya, yet they are not secular and are actually enforcing Shariah law in Libya which used to be a secular country under Gaddafi's government (that is the imperialist NATO backed NTC rebels in Libya with Libyan al-Qaeda members among them like Abdelhakim Belhadj, Abu Sufyan bin Qumu, and others easily found in mainstream Western media even).

Edited by Haidar Saafi, 31 October 2011 - 01:55 AM.

[Haidar Saafi]

alimohamad40, on 30 October 2011 - 02:26 PM, said:

bashar al asad in recent interview said bout the protests " this is  a war between islamization and arab nationalism"

Does that mean Imam khamenie is supporting the izlamization or the arab racism thing ?

I think khamenie is trying to save the resistance by any cost but its proving too costly
from experience all the countries have helped the zionist entity embargo the resistance except syria  so they dont want to see a system which will sign a surrender treaty but they can not turn a blind eye to the crimes of the bath system and they can not deny that its an anti islamic system

Baathism, whatever else one wants to say about it, is not inherently anti-religion or anti-Islam.  In fact Baathist founder Michel Aflaq (along with a Syrian Muslim Saladin Bittar who helped Michel Aflaq found Baathist thought) spoke very positively of Islam; despite the fact he (Michel Aflaq) was a Syrian Christian by birth.

As for Imam Khamenei (HA) and Iran's position on Syria, it is the correct position as anyone who does any research can see the Syrian people support their government and the reforms process; and the attempt at a coup d'etat in Syria is being orchestrated from outside (by the US and "Israel") who are aiding "Salafist" terrorists affiliated with al-Qaeda to try to overrun Syria.

As for the question of Islamization in Syria, the current Syrian government is not atheist or something they are all Muslim (President Assad is a Muslim, etc) they simply run a country that is secular.  As for Iran's policy, we support Islam and Muslims; but we stand against Wahhabis who want to install a regime that will be anti-Shi'a and even anti-Sunni (i.e. even Sunnis that aren't extreme enough for the Wahhabis tastes).

Ask yourself one simple question, should Iran support the Taliban in Afghanistan?! Of course not the Taliban is a Wahhabi organization that is the enemy of Islam and especially Shi'i Muslims; thus you get a similar answer when we see the al-Qaeda affiliated "Salafi" terrorists that are attacking Syria and the Syrian people today.

Edited by Haidar Saafi, 31 October 2011 - 02:03 AM.

[Wahhabism4All]

Basra is back with his 5th account.

Haidar Saafi = Taufiq = Follower of Rohullah = Basra = Abdul-Rahman Brent

[ImAli]

Justice4all, on 31 October 2011 - 09:24 AM, said:

Basra is back with his 5th account.

Haidar Saafi = Taufiq = Follower of Rohullah = Basra = Abdul-Rahman Brent

Do you sit here all day and wait for him?

[Wahhabism4All]

^ No, I come online to read the forums and Basra's posts are so very easy to spot.

[Haidar Saafi]

Justice4all, on 31 October 2011 - 09:24 AM, said:

Basra is back with his 5th account.

Haidar Saafi = Taufiq = Follower of Rohullah = Basra = Abdul-Rahman Brent

Not even commenting on threads, just falsely claiming I'm some other user shows that you have nothing of value to say.  What was so "unique" about Basra's writing that you can somehow "tell" that I am allegedly him?!

[Wahhabism4All]

Haidar Saafi, on 31 October 2011 - 10:15 PM, said:

Not even commenting on threads, just falsely claiming I'm some other user shows that you have nothing of value to say.  What was so "unique" about Basra's writing that you can somehow "tell" that I am allegedly him?!

You're a big time fraud Basra. You are a Polish-American. You lied to other users where you told them you are not white. You created another account where you posed as an Arab Alawite. Now you are lying again with another fake personal name. What is your name, Abdul-Rahman, Abdul-Husayn, Taufiq or Haider? I know what it really is. You are a pathological liar. I'm starting to think you have mental issues and were not accepted by the Polish-American community, so you sought another identity where you could try to fit in.