Jump to content


- -

* * - - - 9 votes

28 Issues With Quran


234 replies to this topic

#226 Nad_M

Nad_M

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPip
  • 376 posts
  • Location:africa/europe

Posted 01 October 2012 - 06:20 AM

You're not paying attention. Here it is one more time:

Nad_M said:

The verse does not mean "We are prevented from sending miracles because previous nations disbelieved" Rather it means that "Our Mercy prevents us from sending a miracle as per your immidiate request" -adding the example of Thamud who were also given respite but eventually destroyed when they transgressed in the matter of the she-camel

There are 2 parts to the verse and you are ignoring the 2nd. The verse speaks of disbelievers requesting miracles in order to believe, and God being merciful in not answering their request to avoid them the same faith as the people of Thamud who did the same and were met with destruction. This means it is God's mercy that prevents Him from answering their request because the sending of signs is not meant at destroying the people (in case a sign comes at their request as a condition to believe) but at warning them and make them mend their ways and this is proved through the example of Pharao. While you think it serves your position, the fact is it doesnt because the signs (3 to Pharao in particular and 6 to the Egyptians in general) to Pharao were not given to Moses as per anybody's request such as in the example of Thamud above, but even before Moses went to meet Pharao whom he was told to warn and make him mend his ways 43:48"And We did not show them a sign but it was greater than its like, and We overtook them with chastisement that they may turn". These were warning signs, just as 17:59 says "and We do not send signs but to make (men) fear" and when God judged that every possible warning was properly conveyed and that nothing more can be done to make them mend their ways, He imposed His judgement on the rejectors of His prophet.

As for the nation of Jesus, your attempt to use the argument that punishement did not befall them in his lifetime to counter the fact that all throughout prophetic history God destroyed those who rejected the prophets sent with manifest signs, does not hold. The Quran states, in several places that God's punishement befalls the nation of rejectors on its appropriate time, whether or not the prophet is caused to die prior to the descent of the scourge 13:40-2,36:26-32,40:77 because 58:21"Allah has written down: I will most certainly prevail, I and My messengers; surely Allah is Strong, Mighty".
Physical destruction and abasement came on them soon after Jesus' departure. The Temple of Jerusalem was razed to the ground as Jesus predicted in Matt23,24,Lk23 (Quran 17:7,3:56) the Israelites were slaughtered in large numbers women and children included, by the Romans and many more were enslaved and sold in the markets, as Jesus prophesied lk21:24 and soonafter they were scattered yet again throughout the earth and for the next 1900 years they would have no authority in this land. The area of the Temple became a place were the inhabitants of Jerusalem, including the Christians and Jews threw their garbage, in accordance with Jesus' prophecy that not a stone would be left standing on another, for the Israelites' rejection of him Luke21 and as a confirmation that should they turn away from the commands of God, God Himself will uproot them from the land He has settled them in to assert their righteousness, turn their sacred shrine into an object of ridicule among the nations 2Chronicles7:19-22.

On 16:104, look at the verses surrounding it. It is speaking of people who strongly, willfuly reject guidance when it comes to them. These are kuffar, or disbelievers. It has nothing to do with any of your examples.

Regarding 64:9, once more, a good act from a Quranic point of view is something God commanded or in accordance with the principles of this Book. The Quran repeatedly speaks of how any act devoid of this principle by those who willfuly reject those very principles, will remain "lost" in this present world and will not be accounted for in the Hereafter. This is similar to what Jesus said in the NT in Matthew 6 about those who do "good" without any perspective of the Hereafter (not as God commanded) such as praying, fasting or giving to charity only to be seen by men that they will have no reward in the Hereafter and that they will be paid in full in this world only, meaning the deed will not be considered as "good" in the Hereafter.
Similarly, believing in Allah does not merely imply believing He exists but believing in Him as is taught in His Book. The Quran gives many examples, including those of the Christians or Arab pagans who do not believe in God as they ought to due to their rejection of the way taught in God's Book, the Quran. So when 64:9 describes the succesful in the Hereafter as those "who believe in God and do good", it excludes the above mentionned groups and this is clearly attested by the direct context of the verse which you are trying to isolate and distort.
There is a reason why the Quran speaks of mawazin/scales in the Hereafter 23:102-3. The plural indicates there will be many criteria of evaluation and measurements to which a deed will be compared to, for it to be weighty in the spiritual realm.

As for the people to whom Islamic guidance did not come or who did not willfuly reject it, and who have their own beliefs according to which they act in this world, the Quran presents an exchange between the prophet Musa and Firon, explains that Allah alone decrees the destiny of those who were not reached by divine guidance for He alone knows their motives and understands the cause of their choices, and He alone can appreciate their spiritual merits and demerits 20:48-55,17:54"Your Lord knows you best; He will have mercy on you if He pleases, or He will chastise you if He pleases" 25:58"and Sufficient is He as being aware of the faults of His servants". God then adds to Moses' answer that common sense and the observation of nature must lead a person to cognizance of a unique Creator. God has created in man the innate ability to come to such conclusion through reason and observation. The Quran states that all humans have, ingrained in their souls, a basic guidance to understand the great evils and make the essential correct spiritual choices so each person is at least responsible for his response to that basic guidance. This innate guidance must be nurtured or it dies and all humans therefore will be held responsible for at least failing or succeeding in hearkening the basic calls of their ingrained God-consciousness 7:172-3,75:2,91:7-10.
So for these groups to be included among the succesful in the Hereafter, described in 64:9 as "whoever believes in Allah and does good", then their belief in God will have to be in accordance with their innate guidance and common sense, and the nature of their deeds may not conflict with their innate capacity to understand good and evil. This means that in any case, a deed is only good because it is in accordance with God's revealed principles.

Concerning your vague reference to 30:30 and Allah's fitra, it doesnt say people are born Muslims, rather that originaly, every human being is made spiritually upright, naturally inclining to the Truth and this is due to the ingrained guidance already spoken of above, which every person is responsible to nurture and develop.

Edited by Nad_M, 01 October 2012 - 07:11 AM.


#227 MysticKnight

MysticKnight

    Member

  • Banned
  • 2,488 posts
  • Religion:Holding on to Haidar Al-Karar.

Posted 01 October 2012 - 11:57 AM

NadM, I feel you don't address my points and are just making up your own sentences where-ever you want. You can always says "this means this and that" , and say it to mean what you want, but the phrase won't imply it, if the words don't mean that.

Case in point for example, you are emphasizing it's God's Mercy that made him prevent sending signs to Mohammad up to that point, but the verse states a completely different statement. All the other factors you mention are also not stated in the phrase. In other words, I can't really argue with you when you are going to say "this means this and that" and put any phrase you want.

Doing good has a practical meaning every society has been aware of for a very long time. If are you going to change it to "it's only good when this and that", sure you can solve the contradiction, but it doesn't convince me. It might convince others, I don't know, but I do believe everyone including those whom reject Islam are capable of doing good deeds. This is different then stating they are righteous and not unjust, and I do believe that they can be righteous and not unjust as well, but that's a different topic.

If it says "those whom believe not in our ayat", doesn't mean "whom willfully reject our ayat"..sorry but I can't see the conversation going anywhere where you simply make every sentence mean what you want it to mean.

Also why are future generations punished for past generations in the case of Bani-Israel example? The point is that generation was not punished. And since when did oppression of others consitute a punishment of God upon a nation? Is God punishing the Palestinians now?
I promised my soul I will remember. Peace is upon the family of Taha and Yaseen.

"Plunge into the depths until you reach the truth."-Imam Ali.

#228 HDarvish

HDarvish
  • Basic Members
  • 4 posts
  • Religion:Universal

Posted 03 October 2012 - 03:42 AM

View PostMysticKnight, on 19 August 2011 - 12:56 PM, said:

Attachment Problems.rtf

I wrote 28 issues there. If anyone finds a solution to any of them, just post it.

Bismillah

First of All, you cannot base your faith on question, faith is not a question but an answer, If you have money read Tafseer-e-Qur'an, don't ever believe your faith on your question. point out my mistake, if i am wrong for We have not known much (16 years old)

#229 Nad_M

Nad_M

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPip
  • 376 posts
  • Location:africa/europe

Posted 05 October 2012 - 01:26 PM

You're still not paying enough attention, and are still muddled with basic misunderstandings.

1- There was no question of God's mercy being the reason why Muhammad wasnt given any signs. The prophet Muhammad was given signs, as said in the previous post.
What i said and what the verse 17:59 is clear on, is that no sign will be sent as per the disbelievers' request, who are only seeking excuses for their disbelief, to avoid their inevitable destruction as happenned to Thamud spoken of in this same verse. So it is God's mercy preventing Him from answering their request because signs cause the destruction of those that request then reject them, while signs are meant to be a mercy to the people, making them mend their ways "and We do not send signs but to make (men) fear".

2- There was no question of willful rejectors of Islam unable to do any good, that is, in accordance with their "self-reproaching soul" and innate understanding of good and evil, however and as already stated, these good deeds will be restrained to this passing world 18:104"lost in this world's life". The restriction of these good deeds to this passing world means:
- their corresponding reward will be paid in this world, because the Quran (and Jesus in the NT as shown previously) repeatedly says that Allah never lets the good deeds remain unrewarded as seen in 11:15-16 and many other verses.
- they will have no value in the Hereafter because as stated in 23:102-103 these people will have "light scales" (see previous post for what the plural "mawazin" implies). In fact a good deed, even done by someone who has professed Islam, such as charity for example can be nullified in the Hereafter if not done as commanded 2:264.

Finally, 64:9 gives two inseparable conditions to be among the successful in the Hereafter:
- Belief in God, meaning at least in accordance with the innate guidance and common sense spoken of previously, or as prescribed in the Quran for those reached by the guidance of this Book. This excludes the willful rejecters of Islam, as per your example.
- Doing good, meaning at least in accordance with the innate guidance spoken of previously, or as prescribed in the Quran for those reached by the guidance of this Book. The willful rejecters of Islam, can still do good and be rewarded for them in this world, but their deeds will have no value in the Hereafter

As regards your off topic question, the current generation's punishement is contingent on its persistence in the evil ways for which its forefathers were punished. This means if they mend their ways, the punishment will be removed.
The punishements the Israelites had to face in this very world 3:56 for their rejection of Jesus and attempts at his life, is that they were subdued to the followers of Jesus until the Day of Resurrection 3:55"and make those who follow you above those who disbelieve to the day of resurrection". Allah is addressing Jesus and is speaking of the dominion of those who follow him over those that reject him. This favor of God is a fact proven today, with the Israelites being totally dependant upon the Christians for their survival. Today, they are condemned to the humiliating reality of being entirely dependant on other people's whims for their survival, reluctantly accepting "bribe" money and deceitful "love" from the followers of the one they bitterly rejected, for the sake of maintaining a state that is the shadow of what was once God's favor upon them.
Besides them being subdued up to this day to the Chrisitans, God warns them of further chastisement 17:8 whenever they return or persist in their wrong ways (their dark history in Christian lands more particularly bears testimony to this) as well as condemned them to have their security fully in the hands of others 3:112 ie it isnt God Himself who would repell their numerous enemies and Who would give them the upper hand on more powerful foes as he did in the times of Moses. Such security could either come from some Muslim states (of the past and today) in the name of Allah or from some non-Muslim states for other reasons. This is because 3:112"they have become deserving of wrath from Allah, and humiliation is made to cleave to them; this is because they disbelieved in the communications of Allah and slew the prophets unjustly; this is because they disobeyed and exceeded the limits" and the Quran continues by making a distinction between them 3:113"They are not all alike; of the followers of the Book there is an upright party.."

And who says the current situation of the Palestinians is a divine punishement?

#230 MysticKnight

MysticKnight

    Member

  • Banned
  • 2,488 posts
  • Religion:Holding on to Haidar Al-Karar.

Posted 05 October 2012 - 01:53 PM

You know it took me 5+ years to realize the words "nothing prevented us from sending signs except that the former people rejected them" means exactly that, and doesn't mean "nothing prevented us from sending the signs but that we would have punished them but out of our mercy didn't want to do so".  It will take time to realize what the phrase says.

1) There is only one reason that God didn't send signs up to that point.
2) That reasons is nothing else but that former people rejected them.

Adding all sorts of reasons and factors won't do away with the problem of the verse.

Even if this was stated to be the reason as you say, it would be inconsistent and enough to raise eyebrows, because all in the past people were sent signs and God's mercy never prevented him? What is he a special God towards Arabs? He is merciful towards them but not towards others?

If he can stop his ways of sending signs out of mercy, he can also stop punishing those who reject his signs....

At any rate, on top of that, he ends up sending a miracle (moon miracle)....

On top of that, it's saying Quran miracle was not clear enough to warrant punishment, which shows it's not a decisive proof. Yet they are going to be tortured eternally forever in hell, due to rejecting Quran....

All this is inconsistency.

Imagine a modern day Prophet comes along and says he confirms all the Prophets of the past. When asked why he isn't sent with miracles, he says it's out of a mercy...previous people were sent miracles God's mercy didn't prevent that from happening....but now God wants to be merciful for a change.

Three questions people can pose:

1) Why isn't he merciful to past people and sent them miracles when he knew they would reject?
2) Why is he specially merciful towards us now, what makes us special?
3) Why God can't be extra merciful and send signs and not punish for rejecting?

But imagine a modern day Prophet comes and doesn't even say "it's God's mercy I am not sent with signs..." but instead says "it's because it was always rejected in the past by majority of the people!".

Would it make sense at all? No. It would like the worse reason you can come up with. But this exactly what Quran states.
I promised my soul I will remember. Peace is upon the family of Taha and Yaseen.

"Plunge into the depths until you reach the truth."-Imam Ali.

#231 MysticKnight

MysticKnight

    Member

  • Banned
  • 2,488 posts
  • Religion:Holding on to Haidar Al-Karar.

Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:04 PM

As for belief in God, if God is defined be the Creator or the Greatest Being, then most of humanity has believed in in this concept.  It's similar to how most of humanity believes in (objective) morality. Humanity differs on the details of (objective) morality but also agree upon key points. In fact, as far as belief in what type of God, it's all linked to our view of morality. Unfortunately most of humanity get's their view of morality distorted by culture and religion as well as other factors.

It doesn't make sense to say humans haven't believed in morality just because they were wrong on some of it's details or rejected some it's objective commands. In the same way, it makes no sense to say someone doesn't believe in God just because their idea of the Creator/Ultimate Being differs.
I promised my soul I will remember. Peace is upon the family of Taha and Yaseen.

"Plunge into the depths until you reach the truth."-Imam Ali.

#232 MysticKnight

MysticKnight

    Member

  • Banned
  • 2,488 posts
  • Religion:Holding on to Haidar Al-Karar.

Posted 05 October 2012 - 02:09 PM

I brought the Palestinian issue because it's inconsistent to take oppression/worldly state of Israelites to be divine punishment, but not that of others oppressed.

And Jews don't believe they rejected a true Prophet...it hardly makes sense generations later should be punished for crimes of ancestors. The miracles of Jesus is not amongst the people now and there is no historical evidence of such miracles and even arguable no historical evidence of Jesus existing. Why should Jews be punished all because one generation rejected miracles shown to them? It doesn't make sense at all....
I promised my soul I will remember. Peace is upon the family of Taha and Yaseen.

"Plunge into the depths until you reach the truth."-Imam Ali.

#233 Nad_M

Nad_M

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPip
  • 376 posts
  • Location:africa/europe

Posted 09 October 2012 - 08:04 AM

In those 5+ years you kept missing the second part of the verse 17:59, telling you what kind of "ancients" reject signs. They were the Thamud who were destroyed when they transgressed in the matter of the she-camel, a sign they had requested then denied 14:9-10,26:154-5. The example of Thamud, which you keep ignoring and denying is very relevant here because it is exactly the same scenario as with the Quraysh who were tauntingly demanding a sign. The verse isnt speaking of the sending of signs in general, but of the sending of signs as per the disbelievers' request.
As already said, the camel was sent after a long time of respite and continuous taunting of their prophet. During that time, they kept mockingly asking for the punishement to befall them and were urged to ask for forgiveness instead. As per the divine law (already mentionned in the previous post) concerning the prevailing of God's messengers and destruction of the die-hard rejecters, they were bound to perish at the expiration of their time of respite. This means they were bound to be destroyed whether or not their request for a sign was granted, so God used those people who were doomed in all case as an example for the following generations by accepting their request for a sign.

The answer to the question causing your eyebrows to rise is found in the previous post too. When God judges that every possible warning has been properly conveyed and that a nation's respite during which it was given sufficient time to reflect on the signs and message brought by the prophets has expired, and that nothing more can be done to make them mend their ways, He imposes His judgement on the rejecters of His prophets in this world.  
While some prefer living in a lawless universe where they will never be held morally accountable, others believe in a universe based on truth, where falsehood is a disruptive force bound to vanish;
- either in this world by those causing it themselves after all possible warnings have been properly conveyed by the merciful God
- or ultimately on a Day where only deeds based on Truth will be valuable.

You're still muddled in the misunderstanding that 17:59 is a justification of why Muhammad wasnt given signs while it was explained that not only signs were given to him as and when God deemed it fit (meaning not in accordance with his opponents' desires), but also that 17:59 is concerned with answering those who request signs, wanting them to conform to their own whims, in heedlessness of the fact they are inviting their own doom.

There was no question of defining correct belief in God based on uniformity among the people's faith. Correct belief in God is first and foremost defined according to the (already mentionned) innate guidance and cognizance of God.
Uniformity among the people's faith only becomes a criteria of correct faith when these people have been reached by divine guidance and when it was properly conveyed to them, and that they have willfuly accepted it. In that case, those that willfuly reject it after having understood it become accountable for their distorted spiritual notions, as compared to the others who accepted that divine guidance.

The harships suffered by the Jews are in accordance with both Quranic and Biblical prophecies, for their transgressions despite the miracles they witnessed as a nation. Especially concerning the Quranic prophecies spoken of in the previous post, they are an ongoing phenomenon for almost 2000 years, and will remain so until the resurrection. The principle of divine punishement being at the height of the miracle witnessed was explained previously, just as the fact punishement is removed from those who do not persist in the evil ways and thoughts of their forefathers. As Jesus said in the NT in confirmation of that principle, the entire nation of Israel will be held accountable for the death of the prophets although not all of them physically took part in their murder Matt14:10,17:l2,Lk11:47-51. It is even reported that the Jews arrogantly and defiently accepted that concept of collective punishment Matt27:25"Then answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our children".

Which prophecy attests to the same regarding the palestinians, did their harships begin after repeatedly denying nation-wide miracles as was the case above? Which principle dictates that those who live a life of ease or hardship are either favored or incuring God's wrath, considering what the Quran repeatedly says about these 2 states which all humanity goes through, having absolutely nothing to do with divine blessing or punishement?

What do you mean by the Quran being an "unclear" miracle?

Edited by Nad_M, 09 October 2012 - 08:30 AM.


#234 ateef

ateef

    Waiting For One!!!

  • Unregistered
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,374 posts
  • Religion:ISLAM
  • Interests:Anything that Interests Me...

Posted 09 October 2012 - 08:36 AM

View PostMysticKnight, on 19 August 2011 - 12:56 PM, said:

Attachment Problems.rtf

I wrote 28 issues there. If anyone finds a solution to any of them, just post it.

Mystic Knight, Your Title Itself Is wrong, there are never Issues with Quran, its Perfect Truth, Issues are with understanding It...

Anyways InshaAllah i will try...Lets Go one by one.ok...

Quote

I will start with Suratal Teen. In Suratal Teen it said:

áóÞóÏú ÎóáóÞúäóÇ ÇáúÅöäúÓóÇäó Ýöí ÃóÍúÓóäö ÊóÞúæöíãò {4}
[Shakir 95:4] Certainly We created man in the best make.
[Pickthal 95:4] Surely We created man of the best stature
[Yusufali 95:4] We have indeed created man in the best of moulds,
Ëõãøó ÑóÏóÏúäóÇåõ ÃóÓúÝóáó ÓóÇÝöáöíäó {5}
[Shakir 95:5] Then We render him the lowest of the low.
[Pickthal 95:5] Then we reduced him to the lowest of the low,
[Yusufali 95:5] Then do We abase him (to be) the lowest of the low,-
ÅöáøóÇ ÇáøóÐöíäó ÂãóäõæÇ æóÚóãöáõæÇ ÇáÕøóÇáöÍóÇÊö Ýóáóåõãú ÃóÌúÑñ ÛóíúÑõ ãóãúäõæäò {6}
[Shakir 95:6] Except those who believe and do good, so they shall have a reward never to be cut off.
[Pickthal 95:6] Save those who believe and do good works, and theirs is a reward unfailing.
[Yusufali 95:6] Except such as believe and do righteous deeds: For they shall have a reward unfailing.

Now the problem is that Islam didn't come to the whole world for it even to be rejected and to exist no good people but the believers whom did good. So why are all of humanity reduced to the lowest of the low except believers? Does it make sense that there is no good humans that morally improved else where, weren't higher then animals?

Now if it is argued "believe" means in God, well the thing is Quran else where has put those whom reject revelation in the hell-fire. So it can't mean that, and it's obvious by how it's been used in Quran, it means those whom believe in Mohammad's message.

Listen,

1. Belief and faith of Ours is in Allah and Not GOD..

2. Indeed Allah is the most Just of Judges

3. Let see some logic,What happens in this World, Around us.May It be schooling or a job...When you behave indecent in school, your teacher slams you, When you do not perform your duties at the job..Your Boss does not promote you, Instead he will throw you out..
Thanks The Most Merciful Almighty , he Forgives you when you repent

Edited by ateef, 09 October 2012 - 08:25 AM.


#235 ateef

ateef

    Waiting For One!!!

  • Unregistered
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,374 posts
  • Religion:ISLAM
  • Interests:Anything that Interests Me...

Posted 10 October 2012 - 01:55 AM

Quote

Another two verses I have a problem with and which causes contradictions are the following:

ãóäú ßóÇäó íõÑöíÏõ ÇáúÍóíóÇÉó ÇáÏõøäúíóÇ æóÒöíäóÊóåóÇ äõæóÝöø Åöáóíúåöãú ÃóÚúãóÇáóåõãú ÝöíåóÇ æóåõãú ÝöíåóÇ áóÇ íõÈúÎóÓõæäó {15}
[Shakir 11:15] Whoever desires this world's life and its finery, We will pay them in full their deeds therein, and they shall not be made to. suffer loss in respect of them.
[Pickthal 11:15] Whoso desireth the life of the world and its pomp, We shall repay them their deeds herein, and therein they will not be wronged.
[Yusufali 11:15] Those who desire the life of the present and its glitter,- to them we shall pay (the price of) their deeds therein,- without diminution.
ÃõæáóٰÆößó ÇáóøÐöíäó áóíúÓó áóåõãú Ýöí ÇáúÂÎöÑóÉö ÅöáóøÇ ÇáäóøÇÑõ ۖ æóÍóÈöØó ãóÇ ÕóäóÚõæÇ ÝöíåóÇ æóÈóÇØöáñ ãóÇ ßóÇäõæÇ íóÚúãóáõæäó {16}
[Shakir 11:16] These are they for whom there is nothing but fire in the hereafter, and what they wrought in it shall go for nothing, and vain is what they do.
[Pickthal 11:16] Those are they for whom is naught in the Hereafter save the Fire. (All) that they contrive here is vain and (all) that they are wont to do is fruitless.
[Yusufali 11:16] They are those for whom there is nothing in the Hereafter but the Fire: vain are the designs they frame therein, and of no effect and the deeds that they do

This verse is basically telling anyone whom has desire for this world will end up eternally in hell. Now how does that even give a remote concept of a Merciful Loving Forbearing God? Whom can not desire this world at all? Notice the verse doesn't say "only desire this world" or anything like that, it clearly states any desire for the world will result the fire forever.

Now the verse in fact has a contradiction. Paradise is promised to those whom believe and do good deeds. Now what if they like most believers probably do, have love of this world, and did some good deeds. They would be promised paradise by verses promising believers whom do good paradise, yet this verse is stating they would go hell, for desire of this world.


I do not know how you looking things at, Such simple things you cannot understand...I think the Seal is on your heart

Yes there are desires in this world...
First remember, this world is very few time, after this life is eternal life....
This World has so many evil desires. Isn't It..

Like a believer should pray and he skips the time and enjoys drinking and gambling with his friends.,..
Like a believer should give alms to the poor, instead he uses the money in evil lusts
Like a believer should speak the truth, Instead he speak lies to earn profit.
Like a believer should be good to his parents, Just to please his wife he banishes them...

Whatever in the Red are Desires...and In Green are the Good Deeds



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users