Wow, this is all very embarrassing, I must say.
Where exactly do they have the authority & evidence to make such a ridiculous claim? Ziyarat is not a fundamental of the religion. Fadlallah is one of the ONLY maraja who actually uses the Qu'ran to create law, not weak, inauthentic hadith like the rest of these maraja do. He is the only one out there conducting constant ijtihad, always researching, always perfecting.
The rest of our maraja need to engage in some self-reflection. Just because you have a religious degree and title does not make you some divine superman.
Fadlallah is one of the only ones who is true & sincere in his actions and words, most other maraja are cowards & posers who will get their heads cut by the Imam(as)
Do everyone a favor, and get a basic education in Islam from your local Saturday school. Do you realize that you have defamed every Marja' in our history? What a joke.
There is a difference between denying something and saying that the modern day version of something has been altered.
His words are absolute batil when we realize that throughout history up until today it has been the ijma' of the Imamiyya that this is a Hadith Qudsi and is authentic beyond a shadow of a doubt.
If you feel he's wrong, then bring it up with him. Or better yet, don't follow him.
Inshallah, I will never follow him.
lol those hadiths are weak have been discussed many times. You will break all the rules just to "prove" Ziyarat Ashura is 100% authentic and those hadiths about cursing those two are authentic. Even stranger, you equate weakening hadiths with loving certain people. Once again, you're making assumptions and making connections where there are none.
They have been proven by our maraja and since the early times, this Ziyarat was recited by the Saliheen. A person who deems this Ziyarat unauthentic doesn't have much to offer us.
As for the ahadith of Imam Baqir (a.s.) cursing your Sheikhein that you are falsely attacking, they are strong in their chains. You claim to know more than Majlisi (r.a.)? He called them Hasan aw Muwaththaq (good or dependable). Many scholars authenticated these ahadith.
The Imami who has been praised is Hasan in transmission. The chains of the Ziyarat have praiseworthy and pious Imami narrators at the least bit. You think you know more than all of our classical and modern scholars, the companions of the A'imma (a.s.), etc.? Please go ask real scholars. Don't be like some unfortunate people who ask pseudo-scholars online about 'ilm ur-rijal. You think they will have a clue, when according to you, all our scholars like Sistani (r.a.), Tabrizi (r.a.), Sadiq Ruhani (r.a.), Lankarani (r.a.), ibn Qawlaweeh (r.a.), Sheikh Tusi (r.a.), al-Qummi (r.a.), Majlisi (r.a.), al-Khoe'i (r.a.), Najashi (r.a.), Kashi (r.a.), etc., etc., etc., are wrong? Please be a bit more logical.
What's your reference that it was revealed for Ahlul Bayt?
Many, many traditions. See al-Mizan fi Tafseer il-Qur'an:
Scroll to the end.
Also, Fadhlullah creates his own tafseer of the final verse of Surat ur-ra'd, which was also revealed for Imam 'Ali (a.s.).
Edited by mansab.jafri, 30 June 2009 - 02:33 PM.
"Remember Mu'awiya! Though now old, I am still Abu'l-Hasan, the man who killed your maternal grandfather, your uncle and your brother in single combats in the Battle of Badr. The same sword is still in my hand, the same blood is still flowing in my veins, the same heart is still throbbing in my chest and with the same courage I face my enemy. Will you come and face me alone?" - Imam Ali (a.s.)