Jump to content


- -

- - - - -

Did Imam Hasan Fight Any Battles For Islam?


10 replies to this topic

#1 Mahdiyah

Mahdiyah

    Mahdiyah Khanam - ãåÏíÉ

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,808 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Religion:Islam

Posted 29 January 2007 - 08:03 PM

Salaam Fellow Br/Sr.

Did Mawla Hasan al-Mujtaba ibn Ali (as) fight in any battles for Islam? And if so then who was the Imam at the time?

#2 Islamic Salvation

Islamic Salvation

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,197 posts
  • Interests:.

Posted 30 January 2007 - 02:57 PM

Imam Hassan (a.s) was a very prominent commander in the Battles of his Father Ameerul Mumineen in the Battles of Jamal (Against Aisha) Siffeen (Against Muawiya) and Naharwan (Against Khawarij).
He was also sent by Imam To Many other Cities to Call people for Jihad.

-

Abu Ali al-Ash'ariy from Muhammad b. Abdil-Jabbar AND Muhammad b. Yahya from Ahmad b. Muhammad all together from Ibn Fadhal from Tha'labah b. Maymun from Ubayd b. Zurarah who said: I heard Aba Abdillah [as] saying - and the Messenger of Allah had just been mentioned, so He said (about Him):
O Allah, verily you know that He is more beloved to us than the fathers and the mothers and even cold water.


Visit http://mutabaralkafi.wordpress.com


#3 Guest_blissful223_*

Guest_blissful223_*
  • Guests

Posted 30 January 2007 - 04:24 PM

Imam Hasan (as) was ready to fight against muawiya, but his entire army had been eaten away by doubt and internal discord.  There was no way he could win in a battle on his own.  He made peace to save those few Muslims that remained, so the religion of Muhammad (saw) would have people left to call to it.  

Its worth noting that Imam Hussein (as) did not wage war upon the people at kerbala: he was hunted down and trapped for his pledge of allegiance, which he simply refused to give no matter the cost.  he repeatedly asked to leave and go back home unharmed, but they refused unless he gave allegiance.  many of his companions and relatives had been killed, and he was atill talking and trying to reason with the enemy to show compassion towards the women and children.  He did not pick up his sword to fight them himself until he had called repeatedly for followers, and they completely rejected him -- desperate for his blood.  He was not challenging the enemy to battle -- he was defending himself.  

This compounds the tragedy of kerbala... a group of the best believers on earth, the son of the messenger of Allah (saw) and his relatives, wishing to pass peacefully but being trapped...denied the simplest of human necessities - water - and hacked to pieces and slaughtered on the burning sands of kerbala, just for saying "No".

with salam.

#4 true_malang_110

true_malang_110

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPip
  • 607 posts

Posted 01 February 2007 - 12:41 PM

It is a fact that Amir-ul-Momineen Ali Ibne Abu Talib (as) would never allow Imam Hassan (as) and Hussain (as) to fight because they were the Prophet Muhammad's (as) son's, so it was his duty that his sons Mohammad Hanif (as), the alamdar of that time, would go ahead of everyone.  It is written that the enemies would criticize Moula Ali's (as) decision to allow Mohammad Hanif (as) first to fight and keep both children of heaven back so Mohammad Hanif (as) responded by telling the enemy that both Imams were Moula Ali's (as) eyes and that he was Moula's arms.

And when Moula (as) passed away the Alamdar and first to fight would turn to Hz Abbas (as) and as we all know there was no need for the army of Islam to fight because Hz Abbas (as) would single handling defeat the enemy because his purpose in life was to protect both imams.

Imam Hasan's (as) main purpose was to depict patience and the sacrifice he would make for Islam.  The same goes for Imam Hussain (as).  These brothers had one purpose in life and that was to sacrifice their lives for us.
We will rebuld it....or die trying

one person asked his father "i know the Prophet (pbuh) lost all of his male offsprings upon birth, but which one did he love the most?".  The father replied "Ali Ibne Abu Talib (as)".  The person response was "Father, I mean son".  The father replied "I know what you said and I my answer is the same.  I have never seen a day go by where The Prophet (pbuh) never raised Ali (as), nor have I ever seen Ali (as) spend more than half an hour away from the Prophet (pbuh)".


Ya Ali Adrikni
Ya Abul Fazil!

Signature Edited. - The Patri0t
Ya Ababdullah!

#5 AkbarHassan

AkbarHassan

    Khatmal Power

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,329 posts
  • Location:Look behind you

Posted 02 February 2007 - 01:28 PM

I read a book that said when Hasnain (a.s.) were around 12 or 13, they would fight side by side with their father.

Posted Image


#6 Mahdavist

Mahdavist

    21:1

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 996 posts

Posted 11 February 2007 - 02:37 AM

Quote

Imam Hasan as.gif was ready to fight against muawiya, but his entire army had been eaten away by doubt and internal discord. There was no way he could win in a battle on his own. He made peace to save those few Muslims that remained, so the religion of Muhammad (saw) would have people left to call to it.

Its worth noting that Imam Hussein as.gif did not wage war upon the people at kerbala: he was hunted down and trapped for his pledge of allegiance, which he simply refused to give no matter the cost. he repeatedly asked to leave and go back home unharmed, but they refused unless he gave allegiance. many of his companions and relatives had been killed, and he was atill talking and trying to reason with the enemy to show compassion towards the women and children. He did not pick up his sword to fight them himself until he had called repeatedly for followers, and they completely rejected him -- desperate for his blood. He was not challenging the enemy to battle -- he was defending himself.

This compounds the tragedy of kerbala... a group of the best believers on earth, the son of the messenger of Allah (saw) and his relatives, wishing to pass peacefully but being trapped...denied the simplest of human necessities - water - and hacked to pieces and slaughtered on the burning sands of kerbala, just for saying "No".

with salam.

Quote

It is a fact that Amir-ul-Momineen Ali Ibne Abu Talib as.gif would never allow Imam Hassan as.gif and Hussain as.gif to fight because they were the Prophet Muhammad's as.gif son's, so it was his duty that his sons Mohammad Hanif as.gif, the alamdar of that time, would go ahead of everyone. It is written that the enemies would criticize Moula Ali's as.gif decision to allow Mohammad Hanif as.gif first to fight and keep both children of heaven back so Mohammad Hanif as.gif responded by telling the enemy that both Imams were Moula Ali's as.gif eyes and that he was Moula's arms.

And when Moula as.gif passed away the Alamdar and first to fight would turn to Hz Abbas as.gif and as we all know there was no need for the army of Islam to fight because Hz Abbas as.gif would single handling defeat the enemy because his purpose in life was to protect both imams.

Imam Hasan's as.gif main purpose was to depict patience and the sacrifice he would make for Islam. The same goes for Imam Hussain as.gif. These brothers had one purpose in life and that was to sacrifice their lives for us.

Excellently written. Jazakallah.

21:1  Their reckoning has drawn near to men, and in heedlessness are they turning aside.



Narrations

AhlulBayt News Agency

Lady Fatemah Trust -    -   Afghan Relief Fund - - The Zahra Trust


#7 Mahdiyah

Mahdiyah

    Mahdiyah Khanam - ãåÏíÉ

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,808 posts
  • Location:UK
  • Religion:Islam

Posted 23 February 2007 - 08:10 PM

Salaam.
Jazaakallah for your replies. Yes every Imam reacted according to the situation they were in at the time thus cannot be compared with eachother because they were all right as guided by Allah.

During the Imaamat of Mawla Hasan ibn Ali (as) were any battles fought?

#8 Ya Aba 3abdillah

Ya Aba 3abdillah

    Destination - Jerusalem

  • Admins
  • 12,381 posts
  • Location:Jabal 'Amil
  • Religion:Islam Shia Usooli
  • Interests:Nahjul Balagha
    www.al-islam.org

Posted 25 February 2007 - 08:55 AM

(bismillah)
(salam)

View Posttrue_malang_110, on Feb 2 2007, 02:41 AM, said:

It is a fact that Amir-ul-Momineen Ali Ibne Abu Talib (as) would never allow Imam Hassan (as) and Hussain (as) to fight because they were the Prophet Muhammad's (as) son's,
Can you please provide more details about Imam Ali (as) refusing to allow the Imams (as) to fight? Imam Ali (as) sent Imams Hasan and Husain (as) and put their lives on the line to protect 3uthman when he was coming under attack during his time as khalifah, although that wasn't a war. As previous members have mentioned, they fought in Basra, Siffin and Nahrwan.

We also must remember that Rasool (pbuh) passed away in the year 11AH. Imam Hasan (as) was born in 3AH. Which means he was 7 to 8 years old when His blessed grandfather passed away. Even if there was a war days before Rasool (pbuh) passed away, Imam Hasan (as) naturally wouldn't have been expected to fight at the tender age of 8.

Badr took place in 2AH
Uhud took place in 3AH
Khandaq took place in 5AH
Hunain took place in 8AH

ws

شبعا، هونين، ابل القمح، قدس، المالكية، تربيخا، صلحا، النبي يوشع - القدس


SHAME on the those who exploit the tragedy of Her Majesty Fatimah Al-Zahraa' (as) to create hate and sectarian discord! You are a SHAME to Her, to Her Father and to Islam!
Ya Shahid Al-Sadr - You lived like Muhammad. You fought like Ali. And you died like Hussain!
Save the Middle East & Declare Jihad Against Sectarianism!

#9 maqnouteh

maqnouteh

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPip
  • 403 posts

Posted 25 February 2007 - 01:30 PM

View PostMahdiyah, on Feb 23 2007, 08:10 PM, said:

Salaam.
Jazaakallah for your replies. Yes every Imam reacted according to the situation they were in at the time thus cannot be compared with eachother because they were all right as guided by Allah.

During the Imaamat of Mawla Hasan ibn Ali (as) were any battles fought?

(salam)

No battle was fully fought though there was to be a battle and Imam  AS had actually gathered some of his supporteres to go out and face Muaweiya but he broke the army through the prescence of hypocrites and some ignorant people in the army who turned against the Imam after listening to the rumours spread by Muawiyas people.
The situation was quite similar to that of the battle of Siffin when the Kharijites turned against Imam Ali AS accusing him of compromising..
This has been recorded by various historians including Yaqubi whose report is amongst the most reliable regarding this particular incident especially.

Hope this was helpful

#10 shobijr

shobijr
  • Basic Members
  • 4 posts
  • Religion:Islam

Posted 05 January 2010 - 12:36 PM

View PostAkbarHassan, on 02 February 2007 - 01:28 PM, said:

I read a book that said when Hasnain (a.s.) were around 12 or 13, they would fight side by side with their father.


i dont know that maybe ur confusing them with Hz abbas when hz abbas was about 10-13 somone at the battle of sifeen  tryed to attack imam hussein he rushed to the man and killed him Imam ali looked so proud and Hz abbas also fought on the battle field in the battle of sifeen then thought he was ali because of hes deadly art of war maybe ur confused with that?

#11 md. ammar ali

md. ammar ali

    Member

  • Advanced Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,430 posts
  • Religion:twelver shia -isna asheri
  • Interests:histroy
    politics
    travelling
    debates

Posted 10 March 2012 - 07:42 AM

labbaik ya hasan (as)



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users