Jump to content

Imamology

  • entries
    27
  • comments
    350
  • views
    6,926

Mecca or the Mechanical

Qa'im

358 views

HWQTudk.jpg

Why have we turned Mecca into the Mechanical?

Mecca is the central pinnacle of human assembly, yet its architecture has been modeled after the capitals of individualism: New York, London, Toronto, and Las Vegas.

Its Ottoman heritage is being destroyed, its mountains are being removed, its mosques are being leveled, and all of it is being replaced with gray skyscrapers, McDonalds, Starbucks, cranes, and boxy buildings.

Over the centuries, our civilization has developed an architectural style, beautiful calligraphy, symmetrical patterns, captivating minarets, and iconic domes. Our mosques were designed to remind us of the divine order of the creation and the beauty of our revelation. We built the marvels that are Istanbul and Isfahan. The Taj Mahal, the Alhambra in Spain, the Dome of the Rock, and the Suleymaniye Mosque are some of the most elegant structures in the world.

The Protestant work-ethic cities in the West were designed with only utility in mind. They designed their cities to maximize profits and productivity, and to minimize costs. Anglo-Saxon culture deviated from the traditional beauty of Catholic architectural style, and they continue to deviate in other areas of morality. After British and American imperialism, Muslims are now emulating their worldly masters in an effort to look “modern”. This has led to the monstrosity that is Dubai and Tehran; cities with no heart and soul, only pollution, traffic, and eyesores.

Ethics is but a branch of aesthetics. Winning back our civilization also means returning to our therapeutic artstyle. We have no need for a concrete jungle in our holiest city.

The Prophet Muhammad (saw) said, "When you see holes pierced through the mountains of Mecca, and when you see the buildings surpass the mountaintops in height, then know that the affair (the Hour) has cast its shadow." (Musannaf Ibn Abi Shayba)

قال حدثنا غندر عن شعبه عن يعلى بن عطاء عن أبيه عن عمرو بن العاص((إذا رأيت مكة قد بعجت كظائم ، ورأيت البناء يعلو رؤوس الجبال فاعلم أن الأمر قد أضلك ))



8 Comments


Recommended Comments

On ‎2017‎-‎09‎-‎02 at 9:34 PM, Grillz said:

you know how he says the hour has cast a shadow what if that is the clock tower casting a shadow(just a theory)

Ive heard this interpretation from Shaykh Hamza Yusuf, very interesting indeed.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Although we a narration in Al-Kafi which speaks against having buildings higher than the Ka'aba (if I remember correctly) - do we have any narrations, like the Sunni one above, which talks about these buildings in an end times context?

Also, is it true that the Imam (as) when he returns will destroy the Masjid Al-Haram and return it to the way it was before? Does that have something to do with the buildings we see today?

Edited by E.L King

Share this comment


Link to comment
21 hours ago, E.L King said:

Although we a narration in Al-Kafi which speaks against having buildings higher than the Ka'aba (if I remember correctly) - do we have any narrations, like the Sunni one above, which talks about these buildings in an end times context?

Also, is it true that the Imam (as) when he returns will destroy the Masjid Al-Haram and return it to the way it was before? Does that have something to do with the buildings we see today?

I would understand why he would destroy them but wont it cause a big mess and where will the people performing hajj go to sleep. One of the reasons they built those big buildings is to accommodate people going on hajj  

Share this comment


Link to comment

I totally agree. With the recent tragedies attributed to miscalculated crowd control (and else), your thoughts are the first thing that came to mind.

Saudis issue haj quotas to keep the turn-out in line to avoid over populating the pilgrimage site. Yet, no quota is set on the brick and mortar circus. I see a more sinister plan at play having boxed in the site and leaving little next to zero room for expansion. They can't even manage the current flow of visitors let alone the fast growing numbers expected in the years to come. Then again, it's hardly bad planning, at least the Saudis can enjoy a fillet-o-fish from McDees and maybe a pumpkin spice Latte from Starbucks....what more do they need for a free ticket to heaven.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Brother, I'm actually confused. I don't wish to come across as overly critical, nor do I wish to go off topic, but you've presented a quote as the words of Rasoolallah (s), yet it's from the musannaf of Ibn Abi Shayba and it's narrated by amr ibn al-aas, an enemy of the ahlulbayt. Surely it's unwise to do this for two reasons, which are:

1) There's a big chance you're attributing words to Rasoolallah (s) which are not his, which has serious consequences.

2) You strengthen what may be a false narrative about the end times for unsuspecting Shi'a who look up to long-time posters such as yourself.

These two are negated if you can find a reliable hadith which reports the same thing in our own sources, but then why didn't you quote that in the first place?

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Blog Statistics

    • Total Blogs
      57
    • Total Entries
      236
  • Latest Blog Entries

  • Latest Blog Comments

    • Salam: Brother Islamic Salvation: Can you please explain and share with us the hadith that relate to this ayat? (2:78)    وَمِنْهُمْ أُمِّيُّونَ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ الْكِتَابَ إِلَّا أَمَانِيَّ وَإِنْ هُمْ إِلَّا يَظُنُّونَ   this is from tafsir as Safi (can you please translate?)
      قال عليه السلام: قال رجل للصادق عليه السلام فإذا كان هؤلاء العوام من اليهود لا يعرفون الكتاب الا بما يسمعونه من علمائهم لا سبيل لهم إلى غيره فكيف ذمّهم بتقليدهم و القبول من علمائهم و هل عوام اليهود الا كعوامنا يقلّدون علمائهم فان لم يجز لأولئك القبول من علمائهم لم يجز لهؤلاء القبول من علمائهم فقال عليه السلام بين عوامنا و علمائنا و بين عوام اليهود و علمائهم فرق من جهة و تسوية من جهة أما من حيث استووا فان اللَّه قد ذمّ عوامنا بتقليدهم علماءهم كما قد ذمّ عوامهم و أمّا من حيث افترقوا فلا، قال بيّن لي ذلك يا بن رسول اللَّه قال إنّ عوام اليهود كانوا قد عرفوا علمائهم بالكذب الصريح و بأكل الحرام و الرّشا و بتغيير الأحكام عن واجبها بالشفاعات و العنايات و المصانعات «1» و عرفوهم بالتعصب الشديد الذي يفارقون به أديانهم و إنهم إذا تعصبوا أزالوا حقوق من تعصبوا عليه و اعطوا ما لا يستحقه من تعصبوا له من اموال غيرهم و ظلموهم من أجلهم و عرفوهم يقارفون المحرّمات و اضطروا بمعارف قلوبهم إلى أن من فعل ما يفعلونه فهو فاسق لا يجوز ان يصدق على اللَّه و لا على الوسائط بين الخلق و بين اللَّه فلذلك ذمّهم لما قلّدوا من قد عرفوا و من قد علموا أنّه لا يجوز قبول خبره و لا تصديقه في حكايته و لا العمل بما يؤديه إليهم عمّن لم يشاهدوه و وجب عليهم النظر بأنفسهم في أمر رسول اللَّه صلّى اللَّه عليه و آله إذ كانت دلائله أوضح من أن يخفى و أشهر من أن لا يظهر لهم و كذلك عوام أمّتنا إذا عرفوا من فقهائهم الفسق الظاهر و العصبيّة الشديدة و التّكالب «2» على حطام الدنيا و حرامها و إهلاك من يتعصبون عليه و إن كان لإصلاح أمره مستحقاً و بالترفق بالبر و الإحسان على من تعصبوا له و إن كان للاذلال و الإهانة مستحقاً فمن قلّد من عوامنا مثل هؤلاء الفقهاء فهم مثل اليهود الذين ذمّهم اللَّه بالتقليد لفسقه فقهائهم فأما من كان من الفقهاء صائناً لنفسه حافظاً لدينه مخالفاً على هواه مطيعاً لأمر مولاه فللعوام أن يقلّدوه، و ذلك لا يكون الا بعض فقهاء الشيعة لا جميعهم فان من يركب من القبائح و الفواحش مراكب فسقة فقهاء العامّة فلا تقبلوا منهم عنا شيئاً و لا كرامة لهم. Any further material from Nur thaqalyn, Qummi, majma al bayan etc??? Thanks,
    • Don't let a bad day make you feel like you have a bad life. 
    • Call it blind luck or divine providence, but it just so happens that there is a sea of oil in the region around the Ka'aba, which keeps the drillers more than happy. Obviously no one strip mines oil, God made sure of that.
    • Native customs regarding care for the land are followed here by Christian and pagan alike. There is no conflict. We also have specific as well as general sacred sites. But....Big, little...sacred is sacred. Let's turn all of Mecca into an open-pit mine, starting with the Kaaba. It's just a place and who knows what resources are available? Why should it be special? I'm thinking a lot of Muslims would not be down with that, but I'd like to see the debate.
    • There is literally just the cube of the Ka'aba. And most of the time its religious significance is in the form of GPS co-ordinates. The rest are just socio-political-cultural constructs. We visit shrines as and when politics etc. allow the shrines to even stand, but at other times they may also be just locations, such as the Baqi cemetry in Medina. Certainly, there is no sanctity attached to large tracts of land. A bit ironic coming from a Catholic Indian.
    • ^ The settlers'  current life ways  , as now stands, are not sustainable. They are finding that out. The ways that were here before obviously were,even with challenges and occasional setbacks. We learned from that over thousands of years. And we are still here. They are failing and losing their belief systems, etc. Ours is undergoing revival. You can't fight weather and tectonic plates. That's the way this planet is set up. Learn to live with it without ruining your food and water supply....or die. How that happens in the future is the task.  The " value of land "depends on the attitudes of the people. How much are your holy sites worth to you? Should they be dug up and strip-mined by outsiders for " progress"?
    • If in the process the nation involved loses its people, its identity and the belief system that kept things that way, then while it is not for me to say whether it is stupid or not, it fails the survivability test. The irony is that ultimately it has no members around that care that they lost.  And it is not a one-way bet. As the people of Easter island found out. Similarly, there are other nations that are developing sustainable technologies and who will likely gain a competitive advantage over those who thought they did not need to. That's a symptom of the problem. Those settler types may well gain new knowledge of what your land could be worth and the more productive future uses to which it could be put, that you may not understand unless you went to the moon as well.
×