• entry
  • comments
  • views

The Story of ShiaChat.com - The IRC (#Shia) Days!



[This will be a series of blog entries on the history of ShiaChat.com; how it was founded, major ups and down, politics and issues behind running such a site and of course, the drama!  I will also provide some feedback on development efforts, new features and future goals and objectives]

Part 1 - The IRC (#Shia) Days!

Sit children, gather around and let me speak to you of tales of times before there was ever high-speed Internet, Wi-Fi, YouTube or Facebook; a time when the Internet was a much different place and 15 year old me was still trying to make sense of it all. 

In the 90s, the Internet was a very different place; no social media, no video streaming and downloading an image used to take anywhere from 5-10 minutes depending on how fast your 14.4k monster-sized dial up modem was.  Of course you also had to be lucky enough for your mom to have the common courtesy not to disconnect you when you’re in the middle of a session; that is if you were privileged enough to have Internet at home and not have to spend hours at school or libraries, or looking for AOL discs with 30 hour free trials..(Breathe... breathe... breathe) -  I digress.

Back in 1998 when Google was still a little computer sitting in Larry Page and Sergey Brin’s basement, I was engaged in armchair jihadi-like debates with our Sunni brothers on an IRC channel called #Shia.  (Ok, a side note here for all you little pups.  This is not read as Hashtag Shia, the correct way of reading this is “Channel Shia”.  The “Hash tag” was a much cooler thing back in the day than the way you young’uns use it today).

For those of you who don’t know what IRC was (or is... as it still exists), it stands for Internet Relay Chat, which are servers available that you could host chat rooms in and connect through a client.  It was like the Wild West where anyone can go and “found” their own channel (chat room), become an operator and reign down their god-like dictator powers upon the minions that were to join as member of their chat room.  Luckily, #Shia had already been established for a few years before by a couple of brothers I met from Toronto, Canada (Hussain A. and Mohammed H.).  Young and eager, I quickly rose up the ranks to become a moderator (@Ali) and the chatroom quickly became an important part of my adolescent years.  I learned everything I knew from that channel and met some of the most incredible people.  Needless to say, I spent hours and dedicated a good portion of my life on the chatroom; of course the alternate was school and work but that was just boring to a 15 year old.

In the 90’s, creating a website was just starting to be cool so I volunteered to create a website for #Shia to advertise our services, who we are, what we do as well as have a list of moderators and administrators that have volunteered to maintain #Shia.  As a result, #Shia’s first website was hosted on a friend’s server under the URL http://786-110.co.uk/shia/ - yes, ShiaChat.com as a domain did not exist yet – was too expensive for my taste so we piggy backed on one of our member’s servers and domain name.

The channel quickly became popular, so popular that we sometimes outnumbered our nemesis, #Islam.  As a result, our moderator team was growing as well and we needed a website with an application that would help us manage our chatroom in a more efficient style.  Being a global channel, it was very hard to do “shift transfers” and knowledge transfers between moderators as the typical nature of a chatroom is the fact that when a word is typed, its posted and its gone after a few seconds – this quickly became a pain point for us trying to maintain a list of offenders to keep an eye out for and have it all maintained in a historical, easily accessible way.

A thought occurred to me.  Why not start a “forum” for the moderators to use?  The concept of “forums” or discussion boards was new to the Internet – it was the seed of what we call social media today.  The concept of having a chat-style discussion be forever hosted online and be available for everyone to view and respond to at anytime from anywhere was extremely well welcomed by the Internet users.  I don’t recall what software or service I initially used to set that forum up, but I did – with absolutely no knowledge that the forum I just setup was a tiny little acorn that would one day be the oak tree that is ShiaChat.com.

[More to follow, Part 2..]

So who here is still around from the good old #Shia IRC days?





First time viewing the Blog channel on SC, first blog read, what a treat!!!

I had wondered but never did ask about the becoming of shiachat.com. Now I know.

I think in my teens I did manage to get on MIRC. Is that the same as IRC?

Back then, I don't think I paid any interest in chatrooms with religion affiliations, maybe I just never came across any (not that I was looking). MIRC was a brief encounter, somewhat on-&-off until I discovered Yahoo Chat (some years later). Had great moments but the overall experience was hijacked in public chat rooms with bots filling up the screen, mic snog hoggers robbing the voice of reason and deliberate third-party tool hacks which would lead to booting users. Worst part of it was the people who were active in these rooms, many vulgar lunatics and socially deprived rude mega-maniacs, not excluding the perverts!

Eventually I became a yahoo defect, packed it in. Right there, in the middle of the storm,  a light at the end of the tunnel, I discovered my redemption - ShiaChat.com. Today I met my redeemer, Bro Ali, thank you for this great initiative and may it grow, in fact out-grow all of us :)


Share this comment

Link to comment


:'(( Wow. Jazakallah for this post. I feel so old now. I joined 2010 But I think I knew about Shiachat before then. I don't know. 

I miss lots of the old members so much! :'( I guess we all have to move on with our lives though. 

Anyways, Inshallah it continues as a success dear Brother. :')

Best Regards


12reasons4truth. likes this

Share this comment

Link to comment

Wow, I remember my IRC days. I feel old now. Just look at us Ali, just on this platform we've been on since 2002. I think at this point we can compare and see who has more gray hairs.



Share this comment

Link to comment

OMG those days were so good. I have used IRC but never knew about shia chatroom. May be i have come across it but don't remember. I was not crazy about chatrooms. :D but i miss those days. Why do we grow up?

Abbas. likes this

Share this comment

Link to comment

thank you for your contributions. your efforts have helped me on personal levels, and I am sure that countless people have benefited as well. May Allah accept it from you as a great deed.

Mansur Bakhtiari likes this

Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Blog Statistics

    • Total Blogs
    • Total Entries
  • Latest Blog Entries

  • Latest Blog Comments

    • I never said or claimed they're doing something good for Islam, just good in general in combating Wahhabi Ideology.  I could care less if another human being sins or draws cartoons of the beloved Prophet SAW.  Because in no way do they nor could they damage what he has done for the world and I'm secure in that. Idols in all forms must be destroyed, including the ones deep in our hearts.
    • Man I think you have got it all wrong as well. You have to be kidding me if you think Majid Nawaz is doing something for Islam as he may appear to battle extremism. Tell me what has majid Nawaz done for Islam apart from all his useless talk? This guy is not a liberal nor a muslim https://newrepublic.com/article/128436/maajid-nawaz-really-believe Plz read this and educate yourself on his real motives. This is a same guy who drew the cartoons of Prophet Muhammad(pbuh). There are much better and devoted muslims who are battling extremism in a much better way. Example is Omar Suleiman (sunni imam in America). Majid Nawaz has an ego and contradicts himself. I can site so many instances but you can research yourself what he actually says.
    • "According to Islam, we are to imitate the sunnah of the 14 infalliables (as). There are good deeds mentioned in the Quran, like giving to orphans, which we do imitate, but others we do interpret, theough tafsir, which you completely reject. However, Muslims don't interpret based on their opinions, but on the opinions of the 14 infalliables (as). Got it? I hope so....... More soon!" Good luck on whether or not you're following something someone made up about them or not, the same I say to the Sunni's and their Sahaba. The way I see it, 14 infallibles (as) and how they behaved is not preserved well at all.  But that's just me.  ""Most Muslims treat the Quran as a document to imitate rather than interpret, suffocating our capacity to think for ourselves." " I can resonate very well with this statement, because it's for this reason we have extremist Wahhabi movements that are violent and power hungry to justify their nafs. At the same time people want to kill each other because of their differing interpretations where no where in the Qu'ran does it say one must die or be oppressed for such - rather it comes from Hadith. I fail to understand criticisms of "Liberal-ness" of the likes of Suhaib Webb, Majid Nawaz, etc.. At least they're not forcing or implicating people are wrong for not following their own ideas/interpretations - they're in no way condemning those who follow otherwise unless it's a path of destruction.  They're not going around saying, "this is the True Islam",  everyone must and should do such and such. They're only fighting the same extremism Shia's, Sunni's and other people of faith's suffer from, and try to find an equilibrium. And the same can be said of religious "training" and creating authorities who hold the keys that can drive extremism as well, because at the end of the day, is reading a bunch of papers and books and sitting and thinking about them going to make you the Ijaza qualified person to give religious authority? -----THERE IS NO RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY----- Islam is undone and doesn't exist as it once did, there's no one unified Caliph for all the Muslims to follow living and communicating to us that well trust - we are divided, broken and all victim's of subjective/relative interpretation that society/modern times has forced us into. What religious training exists today that will promise one Jannah? You ask 30 million people, you get 30 million different answers, including different scholars even from within the same sects! The result is the same if everyone had religious training or not, extremism will persist!   When she says ..." We Muslims have to change ourselves, that's the main difference. We can't keep blaming America or Israel for our misery." " Why isn't this valid?  What makes you think she's wrong that there's nothing to change in ourselves?   Our lack of unification, our constant bickering and intolerance of each other, pan nationalism instead of pan unity is the very fiber that exploits us and tears us apart further!? What gives anyone a right to define rules and subject people to them?   Muslims are stuck in traditions and what they were brought up with, how many will question their own selves/faith/sect and ponder an attitude that will lead to positive change? She is the way she is because of what the Muslims have done to each other, many of her opinions are skewed and down right corrupted/twisted and inaccurate of how she see's Islam, but the Sunni's, and Shia' have no one but themselves to blame for this.  Muslims these days tend to think individually, and not wholesomely - or just extend their attention to their country and not their brethren or recognize the fact their enemies are their brethren while their current brethren are their enemies. The inconsistencies/wrongs prevalent in modern day Shiasm/Sunnism are the same reason you reject all of her words, she in the same fashion rejects much of contemporary Sunnism/Shiasm as you see it.    
    • To Elaborate further, Suhayb spent any and all his wealth to the poor and community, even after the Prophet SAW died, and continued to spend his stipends for the needy and did not partake in corrupt Ummayyad wealth schemes. This reeks of guilt by association, in a false accusation of a legitimate believing Sahaba  of being evil, all because he was cried over Umar's death and lead prayers after his death temporarily.  That's unfortunately not an academic/scholarly line of thought at all, and most importantly  it's not an Islamic line of logic. Suhayb in his character was a Greek-Speaking Arab who was kidnapped from a wealthy family and brought up as a slave in Byzantine society, unlike Salman he had no knowledge of the Bible,, Hebrew and other Aristocratic attributes... instead Suhyab only learned directly from the Prophet's SAW Sermons.  His Arabic was harsh/heavy and himself had a difficult time re-learning it. Contextually, Suhayb was a close companion but never could be in an inner circle of influence that was Umar, Uthman, and the rest of the "higher social ranked" Sahaba.  Instead he chose to act simply and directly in what he perceived was the direct way to please Allah SWT, e.g.(Hadith where he gave food after being questioned by 'Umar why he starved himself, that the Prophet SAW told him the best of people were those who gave food and charity).  He was innocent to a fault, and perhaps ignorant.  Assuming Shia rhetoric of 'Umar and Abu Bakr is true of their plot to Usurp the Khilafah,  Suhayb was ignorantly in no place to understand with his lacking Arabic speech and distance from that social status (since he was a slave and not Quraish), the ramifications that 'Umar could have been an evil man and he was crying over an evil guy. He seemed to be a goof ball as well, and is cited for making the Prophet SAW laugh on many occasions, and would never do it at any one else's expense. Shame on the people who ascribe lies and false sayings to the Imams, AS on them all. I've read deeply into the sources in al Kafi, and Yasser Habibs hate rhetoric and I find not a single ounce of legitimate nor logical premises of which to condemn/accuse Suhayb by direct actions, words, or speech. Nearly all sources, even Shia indicate Suhayb as a righteous companion and follower of the Prophet SAW.
    • Is this reference to Suhayb bin Sinan/ aka Suhayb Ar Rumi RA?  Or a different Suhayb? I'd be surprised, considering Suhayb Ar Rumi/bin Sinan was close companions of Bilal ibn Rabah RA and Salman e Farsi RA.  As non-Arab Sahaba, they frequently spent much of their time together. Also, from tafsir, a Quran verse was reveled upon Suhayb's arrival to Medina after being held back by the Qu'raish... he had to give up all of his wealth that he acquired after arriving as a runaway slave of the Byzantine Empire to escape Mecca to Medina after the Hijrah. "Thereupon, the glorious verse was revealed: ‘And of mankind is he who sell himself, seeking the pleasure of Allah And Allah is full of kindness to (His) slaves’ (Quran 2:201). " In fact, he's also fought in every battle alongside the Prophet SAW, and never ran from any nor left his side. Also, Suhayb lived out the rest of his life till old age, spreading for Da'wah until he died (In response to the OP's post).  These were taken from WikiShia: He and Imam Ali were the last of Immigrants who joined the Prophet (s) in the first half of Rabi' I. Some have related the revelation of verse 207 of the sura al-Baqara to him. However, it is famous that it has been revealed about the role of Imam Ali  at Laylat al-Mabit. Suhayb participated in the battles of Badr, Uhud, Khandaq and other battles of the Prophet (s). About him, the noble Prophet (s) said, "the leaders are four people; I am the leader of Arabs, Suhayb is the leader of Romans, Salman is the leader of Persians and Bilal is the leader of Habesha."
    • Salaam, Here's a bit of other side perspective: Sahih Bukhari Hadith Vol.2, Hadith. 375,
      Narrated by Abdullah bin Ubaidullah bin Abi Mulaika
      One of the daughters of 'Uthman died at Mecca. We went to attend her funeral
      procession. Ibn 'Umar and Ibn Abbas were also present. I sat in between them (or
      said, I sat beside one of them. Then a man came and sat beside me.) 'Abdullah
      bin 'Umar said to 'Amr bin 'Uthman, "Will you not prohibit crying as Allah's
      Apostle has said, 'The dead person is tortured by the crying of his relatives?"
      Ibn Abbas said, "Umar used to say so." Then he added narrating, "I accompanied
      Umar on a journey from Mecca till we reached Al-Baida. There he saw some
      travelers in the shade of a Samura (A kind of forest tree). He said (to me), 'Go
      and see who those travelers are.' So I went and saw that one of them was Suhaib.
      I told this to 'Umar who then asked me to call him. So I went back to Suhaib and
      said to him, 'Depart and follow the chief of the faithful believers.' Later,
      when 'Umar was stabbed, Suhaib came in weeping and saying, 'O my brother, O my
      friend!' (on this 'Umar said to him, 'O Suhaib! Are you weeping for me while the
      Prophet said, "The dead person is punished by some of the weeping of his
      relatives?" ' Ibn Abbas added, "When 'Umar died I told all this to 'Aisha and
      she said, 'May Allah be merciful to Umar. By Allah, Allah's Apostle did not say
      that a believer is punished by the weeping of his relatives. But he said, Allah
      increases the punishment of a non-believer because of the weeping of his
      relatives." 'Aisha further added, "The Quran is sufficient for you (to clear up
      this point) as Allah has stated: 'No burdened soul will bear another's burden.'
      " (35.18). Ibn Abbas then said, "Only Allah makes one laugh or cry." Ibn Umar
      did not say anything after that.